Category: Harm Reduction

  • PMI Draws Fire for Supporting Doctors

    PMI Draws Fire for Supporting Doctors

    Photo: Valeri Luzina

    Philip Morris International is drawing fire for sponsoring doctors’ education, reports The Guardian.

    According to the newspaper, the multinational has been supporting medical education programs on quitting smoking and harm reduction in South Africa, the Middle East and the United States. The sponsored courses allow participants to collect credits showing they are engaging in post-qualification learning.

    Nicholas Hopkinson, a professor of respiratory medicine at Imperial College London, lambasted PMI’s medical sponsorships. “Based on its market share (around 15 percent), and the global death toll from smoking (more than 8 million annually), Philip Morris kills at least a million people every year,” he was quoted as saying. “The idea that it should have any role in medical education is grotesque.”

    Hopkinson called for bodies that provide or regulate medical education to “produce explicit statements and policies that tobacco industry involvement is completely forbidden.”

    A PMI spokesperson said the company believes science-based education on the topic of tobacco harm reduction is vital to improve public health.

    PMI provides educational grants for science-based programs that are run independently from PMI and follow accredited standards, including a further independent third-party academic review, he said.

    “Funding is clearly labelled and attributes support from PMI. We do not control the content, and it is unfounded to claim the programs are to promote PMI products. Our activities comply with all applicable laws.”

  • Kgosi Letlape Advocates for Harm Reduction

    Kgosi Letlape Advocates for Harm Reduction

    Kgosi Letlape (Photo courtesy of Kgosi Letlape)

    Kgosi Letlape, co-founder of the Africa Harm Reduction Alliance, has called on governments to prioritize evidence-based harm reduction strategies in improving public healthcare.

    Speaking at the fourth Africa Healthcare Awards and Summit (AHAS), which took place April 22-23 in Accra, Letlape said prohibitory approaches do not work in mitigating the risk of substances and behaviors that are detrimental to health including smoking, drug and alcohol abuse as well as sexually transmitted diseases.

    “Bans don’t solve any behavioral problems, and this truth should not be overlooked by policymakers. Harm reduction offers a practical and transformative approach. It empowers individuals to make informed choices, promoting health and self-direction,” said Letlape.

    Giving tobacco harm reduction as an example he said there was evidence showing that countries that embraced non-combustible nicotine products as an alternative to cigarettes were bringing their smoking rates down, adding that these products reduced the risks of tobacco related illnesses.

    “In Sweden the uptake of snus has been demonstrated to have reduced the incidence of tobacco related disease for example lung cancer and cardiovascular disease” Letlape said, highlighting the critical role of risk reduced products.

    “The problem with cigarettes lies in combustion, not nicotine itself. Non-combustible nicotine delivery methods significantly reduce harm. By choosing non-combustible options, individuals can mitigate risks associated with tobacco use.” That is the reason nicotine replacement therapy has been offered for the last three decades.

    Under the theme “Advances in Population Health – Tackling Inequalities and Access: A One Health Approach,” AHAS 2024 is being attended by healthcare professionals, policymakers, innovators and stakeholders from across Africa to discuss pressing issues in healthcare and foster collaboration for sustainable solutions.

  • U.K. Misleading Public

    U.K. Misleading Public

    Mora Gilchrist (Photo: PMI)

    Philip Morris International has accused the U.K. Department of Health of spreading misinformation about heated-tobacco products after a social media post warning that “all forms of tobacco are harmful,” reports The Grocer.

    A tweet posted by the department in a thread of “myths” about vaping and tobacco contained false and misleading statements and risks driving consumers back to cigarettes or dissuading current smokers from making the switch to alternatives, according to the multinational.

    “What hope do adult smokers have when seeking out accurate information on smoke-free products if it’s the government that’s spreading misinformation?” said PMI Chief Communications Officer Moira Gilchrist.

    “All forms of tobacco are harmful, and there is no evidence that heated-tobacco products are effective for helping people to quit smoking,” the tweet stated.

    “Laboratory studies show clear evidence of toxicity from heated-tobacco products. Unlike vapes, there is no evidence they are effective for helping people to quit smoking,” the post continues, citing a 2017 report by the Committee on Toxicity.

    According to Gilchrist, such statements “distort the scientific evidence base” and “seriously misleads the public.”

    While acknowledging that heated tobaccos are not risk-free, Gilchrist said it is misleading to imply that all forms of tobacco are equally harmful.

    A Public Health England report in 2018 said that available evidence suggested that heated-tobacco products “may be considerably less harmful than tobacco cigarettes” but “more harmful than e-cigarettes.”

    The Grocer

  • Royal College Releases New E-cig Report

    Royal College Releases New E-cig Report

    Photo: Balint Radu

    E-cigarettes represent a valuable aid in smoking cessation, but more can and should be done to reduce their appeal, availability and affordability to nonsmokers and reduce environmental harms, according to a new report by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) in the United Kingdom.

    The results are summarized in over 50 recommendations, which explore trends in combustible tobacco use and vaping products; the differences in health effects of vaping in people who smoke, vape or do neither; ethical dilemmas presented by e-cigarette environmental damage; and the role of the tobacco industry in the rising use of e-cigarettes.

    The RCP report concludes that:

    • since the 2016 RCP report, the evidence of the effectiveness of e-cigarettes as an aid to quitting has become much stronger;
    • use of e-cigarettes by young people and nonsmokers has increased substantially in recent years;
    • prompt remedial measures are needed to curb youth vaping without undermining use by adult smokers as an aid to quitting; and
    • the government should commission a series of regular evidence updates on the use and effects of nicotine products to guide policy.

    Regarding the effectiveness of e-cigarettes as a cessation tool, researchers emphasize that e-cigarettes should be promoted as an effective means of helping smokers to quit smoking tobacco, particularly focusing on those population groups that could benefit the most, such as patients with mental disorders or those who experience socioeconomic disadvantage and people living in social housing.

    Regarding potential health side effects resulting from vaping product use, researchers carried out a review of biomarkers of exposure to and harm from e-cigarettes using data published between 2021 and 2023 comparing people who vape, people who smoke, people who do both (dual use) and people who do neither.

    Although lower levels of harmful substances were found in vapers compared to smokers for many of the biomarkers analyzed, researchers conclude that agreement needs to be reached on the methods for vaping health risks research, including which biomarkers are the most relevant to study regarding the relative and absolute risks of vaping, to draw accurate conclusions. Studies with larger samples are needed both on vapers with a history of smoking and on vapers who have never smoked.

    The RCP report insists on finding a balance between preventing these categories from accessing vaping while not demonizing such products in the eyes of those who use them to quit smoking.

    Regarding youth addiction specifically, RCP researchers concluded that standardized plain packaging combined with reduced flavor and brand descriptions together with retail display bans should be introduced to decrease youth interest in trying vaping.

    E-cigarette price and taxation strategies should reduce the affordability of the cheapest products most commonly used by youth vapers (i.e., disposable e-cigarettes) while ensuring that the products most likely to be used by adults who smoke/quitters (i.e., rechargeable and refillable products), which are also less damaging to the environment, remain affordable.

    The report also proposed to increase prices through the introduction of a consumption tax and a minimum unit price, prohibiting multiple purchases but ensuring that they remain a less expensive option for adults who use them to quit smoking, and limiting promotional materials in retail stores and product visibility, and restricting promotion on social media.

    The authors of the report urge regulators to prevent cigarette manufacturers from playing a role in the development of national policies.

  • Healthcare Providers Urged to Discuss Vapes

    Healthcare Providers Urged to Discuss Vapes

    Tracy Smith and Benjamin Toll have co-authored a commentary suggesting that health care providers providers talk with adult patients who smoke about the relative risks of different tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.
    (Photo: MUSC Hollings Cancer Center)

    Healthcare providers who are working with adult patients struggling to stop smoking should consider discussing e-cigarettes as a potential tool if they’ve already tried FDA-approved medications, say tobacco researchers with MUSC Hollings Cancer Center.

    Benjamin Toll, director of the MUSC Health Tobacco Treatment Program, and Tracy Smith, associate professor in the Addiction Sciences Division of the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, partnered with Brian King, director of the Center for Tobacco Products at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, to write a commentary in Nature Medicine that lays out the relative risk of e-cigarettes compared with traditional combustible cigarettes. Existing scientific evidence indicates that both products have health risks, but that e-cigarettes generally have lower risks than cigarettes.

    To be clear—neither option is good for your health, Toll and Smith said. And they certainly don’t want any youth, or adults who don’t smoke, to take up e-cigarette use. But among adults who have already tried FDA-approved cessation medicines, if the choice is between continuing to smoke traditional cigarettes or switching completely to e-cigarettes, then a complete switch should be encouraged, they said. They were motivated to work with King to write this commentary because they saw confusion among the general public and doctors about the relative harms of each product.

    “It really bothered me that there are well-intentioned, smart healthcare providers who think that e-cigarettes are worse than smoking cigarettes,” Toll said in a statement. “It’s simply not true.”

    Toll, who is currently serving as president of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, wanted to expand the conversation that health care providers can have with patients about ways to stop smoking.

    There are seven FDA-approved smoking cessation aids, including medication and nicotine replacement options like the patch. These smoking cessation products, especially when combined with behavioral counseling, improve a person’s chances of quitting smoking. But because nicotine is so addictive, many people still struggle. That’s where Smith and Toll see a place for e-cigarettes.

    “Doctors and other health care professionals don’t know what to say or how to talk about it,” Smith said. “I always say, ‘If you have somebody who smokes cigarettes, they are standing in a convenience store every single day, buying the most harmful tobacco product they could possibly be buying.’ And it’s a real injustice not to say to them, ‘Hey, there are nicotine products you could buy every day that would be a whole lot less likely to kill you.’”

    However, Toll and Smith are very specific about which types of e-cigarettes they’re referring to. When they say that e-cigarettes have fewer toxicants and cause less harm than cigarettes, they’re referring specifically to the 23 products that have received FDA authorization for marketing.  It’s worth noting that all 23 of these products are tobacco-flavored, not fruity, chocolatey or candy-flavored.

    Smith explained that the FDA created two paths for e-cigarette manufacturers to gain authorization. The first path would allow manufacturers to market their e-cigarettes as smoking cessation devices.

    “Thus far, no company has done that—as far as we know, they have not even applied,” Smith said.

    The second path allows companies to market their products as tobacco products, but makes no claims about smoking cessation. Companies have to show that their products are appropriate for the protection of public health – specifically, that the benefits of the product for helping adults who smoke to transition completely outweighs the known risk of these products to youth and nonusers.

    Besides the likelihood that the product will entice young people, the FDA looks at everything from environmental impact to whether users completely switch to the e-cigarette product from cigarettes. Complete switching, rather than going back and forth between e-cigarettes and cigarettes, is an important factor. If people use both products – something that researchers call “dual use” – then they’re still exposing themselves to the carcinogens and toxicants in cigarettes.

    “So far, the FDA has issued more than a million denials and 23 authorizations,” Smith said.

    Due to the rigorous nature of the reviews, Smith and Toll believe that doctors can reasonably share that list of 23 authorized e-cigarettes with people who are struggling to stop smoking.

    In addition, there’s increasing evidence suggesting that e-cigarettes can help adults who smoke to completely transition away from cigarettes, they said. Recent large-scale studies published in JAMA Internal Medicine and the New England Journal of Medicine showed that e-cigarettes helped people to stop smoking. Further, Smith said, a Cochrane Review conducted earlier this year concluded that there is evidence from enough high-quality studies to say that e-cigarettes are more likely to help people to quit than nicotine replacement therapy, which includes nicotine gum, nicotine lozenges and the patch.

    E-cigarettes remain controversial though.

    “Some believe that we shouldn’t be allowing new tobacco products on the market that could potentially be appealing to youth, no matter what the benefit is to adults who smoke. And I’m just not in that camp because cigarettes are the primary way that tobacco kills people,” Smith said. “For me, because cigarettes are responsible for the vast majority of the deaths and illnesses from tobacco, I think that having less harmful alternatives out there for adults, especially if we can reduce the appeal to youth, is really important.”

  • CTP Launches Webpage on Relative Risks

    CTP Launches Webpage on Relative Risks

    Photo: Farknot Architect

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) has launched a new webpage aimed at educating the public about the relative risks of tobacco products. The CTP will continue to update the information on this new webpage based on the best available science.

    Coinciding with the launch, CTP Director Brian King co-authored a commentary in Nature Medicine, discussing considerations for healthcare providers around talking to adults about the relative risks of different tobacco products.

    The commentary reinforces that youth should not use any form of tobacco products. Among adults who smoke, it stresses the importance of using evidence-based cessation methods, including FDA-approved pharmacotherapies, as a first line treatment.

    For adults who smoke and have tried proven cessation methods with no success, medical providers may consider educating patients about the relative risks of tobacco products and the potential health benefits of switching completely to a lower-risk product.

    Among patients who smoke, the authors note it is critical to reinforce the importance of complete transitioning away from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use. Further, eventual abstinence from all tobacco products should be the end goal, according to King.

  • ‘Quit Like Sweden’ Global Effort Takes Off

    ‘Quit Like Sweden’ Global Effort Takes Off

    Photo: QLS

    International health experts rallied behind a major new global effort to replicate Sweden’s success at eradicating smoking by embracing a comprehensive approach that could prevent millions of premature deaths globally.

    Quit Like Sweden (QLS), launched at a conference in Brazil featuring medical professionals, politicians and policymakers, aims to motivate and support countries worldwide to emulate the example of Sweden, which is set to become the first nation to attain official “smoke-free” status later this year.

    “Sweden has achieved this remarkable feat by ensuring that safer alternatives to smoking are accessible, acceptable and affordable,” said QLS founder Suely Castro, a Brazil-born harm reduction advocate in a statement.

    “A country where 49 percent of men used to smoke regularly has virtually wiped out this scourge by allowing its smokers to switch to products that pose just a fraction of the risks, such as snus [traditional smokeless tobacco] and other smoke-free alternatives like vapes and nicotine pouches.

    “Swedes are reaping the health dividend with significantly lower cancer cases and mortality rates compared to their European counterparts. Now, Quit Like Sweden will amplify this message globally, leveraging expertise and fostering collaboration across stakeholders to help countries replicate the Swedish experience.”

    Sweden is winning the war against smoking with a comprehensive approach to tobacco control that supplements traditional cessation and preventive measures with an all-important added element: giving smokers the opportunity to switch to safer alternatives.

    Castro was joined at the launch of her platform by leading harm reduction experts who unveiled new research showing that Brazil could save 1.36 million lives by 2060 by adopting the Swedish approach.

    Earlier research has shown that 3 million more Europeans would be alive today if other countries had implemented Sweden’s comprehensive approach to helping smokers quit.

    Meanwhile, a study of low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) shows that, through the adoption of Swedish-style policies, Kazakhstan could prevent 165,000 premature deaths in the next four decades while South Africa, Bangladesh and Pakistan could save 320,000; 920,000 and 1,200,000 lives, respectively.

    “Sweden is winning the war against smoking with a comprehensive approach to tobacco control that supplements traditional cessation and preventive measures with an all-important added element: giving smokers the opportunity to switch to safer alternatives,” said research co-author Anders Milton, a former chair of the World Medical Association and former secretary general of the Swedish Medical Association.

    “It has set out a policy roadmap that should be treated as a gift to global public health and, potentially, one of the greatest ever breakthroughs in tackling noncommunicable diseases (NCDs).

    “That’s why QLS is so important. By spreading the message of the Swedish experience to all corners, many millions of premature deaths—including almost 1.4 million here in Brazil—could be prevented in the next four decades.”

  • Brazil Urged to Embrace Harm Reduction

    Brazil Urged to Embrace Harm Reduction

    Photo: Taco Tuinstra

    Brazil could prevent almost 1.4 million premature deaths—equivalent to the population of Porto Alegre—by implementing Sweden’s tobacco harm reduction (THR) strategy, according to a new report to be presented in Brasilia by Smoke Free Sweden today.

    Currently, Brazil has a smoking rate of 13.4 percent, well above the World Health Organization’s official “smoke-free” threshold of 5 percent. This means almost 16,000 Brazilians die each month from preventable diseases.

    Sweden, by contrast, is on track to become officially “smoke-free,” with smoking rates only just above 5 percent.

    This translates into the lowest cancer rates in Europe and reduced mortality from smoking. According to the report’s authors, a significant part of this success story is Sweden’s measured approach to reducing the harm associated with smoking through the use of reduced-risk alternative products such as vaping and nicotine pouches.

    “Although smoking continues to be the leading preventable cause of premature death worldwide, conventional methods in tobacco control have reached a standstill,” said principal author Derek Yach in a statement.

    “Policymakers in Brazil need to acknowledge the pivotal role of tobacco harm reduction products, which are already being utilized by 150 million individuals worldwide, in addressing this urgent crisis.”

    “Tobacco control alone is not enough when it comes to combating high smoking levels,” said Delon Human, leader of the Smoke Free Sweden movement and a key contributor to the report.

    “It must be complemented by a comprehensive set of harm reduction measures. This includes the accessibility, acceptability, and affordability of less harmful alternatives like vaping and nicotine pouches.

    “Public health entities in Brazil should seize the opportunity for global replication of Sweden’s successful approach. Together, we can work towards a smoke free world and ensure the well-being of future generations.”

    Brazil’s Federal Senate is currently considering a bill on the regulation of electronic cigarettes, which have been banned in the country for more than a decade.

  • WHO Urged to Embrace Nicotine Alternatives

    WHO Urged to Embrace Nicotine Alternatives

    Derek Yach

    The World Health Organization should embrace safer alternatives to cigarettes in order to save 100 million lives that will otherwise be lost to smoking, according to Derek Yach, a global health consultant who led the WHO’s Tobacco Free Initiative during development of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was previously president and founder of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World.

    “The WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) has not kept pace with scientific and technological advancements,” Yach writes in The Lancet. “Over 120 million people worldwide, in seeking a path away from combustible cigarettes, have turned to safer alternatives, such as e-cigarettes, oral nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products. Evidence suggests that these alternatives improve quit attempts compared to traditional nicotine-replacement therapy.

    “Yet, the FCTC’s current emphasis on bans, prohibitions and regulations undermines access to these safer alternatives for millions of tobacco users. It is time to recognize their potential and prioritize harm reduction.”

    Writing in response to The 20th anniversary of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: hard won progress amid evolving challenges, Yach sets out a three-point plan that he says could result in potentially 100 million fewer premature deaths between 2025 and 2060:

    • Incorporate tobacco harm reduction: The FCTC should actively promote safer alternatives, recognizing their role in reducing harm.
    • Balanced Regulation: While regulation is necessary, it should not stifle innovation or limit access to safer products.
    • Science-based policies: Governments must base decisions on evidence, fostering independence and informed choices.

    “We cannot afford to wait for a miracle,” he says. “The WHO must adapt swiftly to the changing landscape of tobacco use and embrace innovative strategies to protect public health.”

    Yach disputes Kelly Lee and colleagues’ contention that tobacco companies’ development of safer alternative is purely profit-driven.

    “Negotiations leading to the FCTC’s adoption were intricate and delicate, resulting in nearly all major tobacco producers (except the USA and Indonesia) becoming signatories,” Yach says. “Rather than demonizing these legacy companies, we should acknowledge their evolving stance. Many are actively shifting away from combustible cigarettes, embracing safer alternatives as technology evolves.

    “Saving lives requires bold action. Let us unite in our commitment to a smoke-free future—one where harm reduction leads the way.”

  • U.K. to Introduce Generational Ban

    U.K. to Introduce Generational Ban

    The UK government is set to introduce a bill in parliament aimed at phasing out smoking among young people by prohibiting nicotine sales for future generations.

    The Tobacco and Vapes Bill, if passed unamended, will be one of the world’s toughest anti-tobacco laws and prevent children turning 15 this year or younger from ever being able to be legally sold nicotine products.

    The government said smoking itself would not be criminalized. Therefore, anyone who can legally buy tobacco now will not be prevented from doing so in the future, according to Reuters.

    “If we want to build a better future for our children, we need to tackle the single biggest entirely preventable cause of ill-health, disability, and death: smoking,” Conservative Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said in a statement.

    Critics say the move is “unconservative,” and former prime minister Liz Truss is one of several members of the governing party who have said they will vote against the legislation.

    Despite the opposition, the legislation is expected to pass with the opposition Labour Party suggesting it would support the measure.

    Last month, a similar law introduced by New Zealand banning tobacco sales to those born after Jan. 1, 2009 was repealed by the country’s new coalition government.