The Philippines’ Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) is urging tobacco companies to manufacture their heated tobacco products in the country, citing surging domestic demand and export opportunities, according to the Philippine News Agency.
During the International Tobacco Agriculture Summit in Taguig City on Aug. 2, DTI Undersecretary Ceferino Rodolfo said while local demand for cigarettes is expected to decline from 49.61 billion sticks in 2022 to 39.06 billion sticks in 2027, sales of HTPs are poised to increase significantly during that period.
He cited a Euromonitor predicting HTP retail sales of HTPs to surge by 511 percent to 4.06 billion sticks in 2027.
Rodolfo said HTP producers would benefit the Philippines’ free trade agreements with regional markets. “HTPs, if manufactured in the Philippines, can be imported in ASEAN (except Vietnam), Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea, and Hong Kong at zero percent tariff duty,” he was quoted as saying.
In 2022, the top destinations for Philippine tobacco products included South Korea at $102.2 million, Thailand ($98.29 million) and Myanmar at $49.4 million.
According to Rodolfo, Philip Morris Fortune Tobacco aims to build a PHP9-billion factory in Tanauan, Batangas, for the production of IQOS devices.
Japan Tobacco has launched With 2, its new infused tobacco vapor device, under the company’s respective new brand, With. It will be sold at convenience stores and tobacco stores in Japan beginning Sept. 5, 2023, and will be available for presale online from Aug. 7, 2023.
With 2 is the first device of the new infused tobacco brand With. It features JT’s unique infused technology, which generates vapor while an atomized liquid passes through a capsule containing granulated tobacco.
Since tobacco vapor is generated the moment it’s inhaled, there is no delay in delivery, JT explained in a press note. There is almost no tobacco smoke smell with the product since tobacco leaves are not directly heated. The device is equipped with a dual mode that allows consumers to switch between two heating modes at the touch of a button. The high mode produces 1.3 times more vapor than the normal mode, delivering a more intense flavor experience, according to JT.
Japan Tobacco is launching a new brand named “With” and a new device named “With 2” for infused tobacco capsules in Japan this summer, the company announced on its website.
The company will discontinue its Ploom TECH, Ploom TECH + and Ploom TECH + With infused tobacco capsule devices, which are only in Japan. They will be available until stocks are sold out.
Ploom X, which is a device for heated tobacco sticks, is unaffected by this announcement and will continue to be sold and rolled out in a number of markets including Japan.
JT says it remains committed to investing in reduced-risk products. The company competes in the heated-tobacco segment with its Ploom brand and participates in the e-cigarette market with its Logic brand.
Zilong presented its Marskiss heat-not-burn product at TabExpo in Bologna. (Photo: Taco Tuinstra)
Newcomer Marskiss aims to offer heated-tobacco consumers an improved user experience.
By Stefanie Rossel
Since their introduction to the market less than a decade ago, sales of heated-tobacco products (HTPs) have grown remarkably. Market research companies are outdoing each other in their forecasts for the category. Reportlinker, for example, valued the global HTP market at $22.36 billion in 2022 and expects it to reach $25.89 billion this year. The market is anticipated to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 15.9 percent to reach $72.86 billion by 2030. Euromonitor expects HTPs to cement their place at the head of the vapor growth category, with significant growth in Japan, South Korea, Russia, Italy, Germany, Poland, the U.S. and Ukraine.
The global HTP market is dominated by four large players—Philip Morris International, which pioneered the category with its IQOS device; BAT, which competes with its Glo brand; Japan Tobacco International, known for its Ploom product; and KT&G with its Lil series.
Inspired by the success in the segment of their larger counterparts, many smaller manufacturers have also entered the market. One of them is Singapore-based business Zilong. Driven by its desire to design a safe and good-flavored HTP, the company spent more than 10 years developing Marskiss before debuting the product in 2021 at the WT Middle East exhibition in Dubai and, more recently, showcasing it at TabExpo 2023 in Bologna.
To understand how Marskiss differs from other HTPs, it’s helpful to examine the company’s background. Zilong was founded by Zhan Baoming, who has worked China’s tobacco industry since 1991 and also owns a cigarette flavoring company. Zhan has been in tobacco harm reduction since 2000. The knowledge he acquired about tar reduction and aroma enhancement laid a solid foundation for the creation of Zilong’s HTP product, according to Zhan. “My goal is to make a good HTP product that is low in tar while satisfying in tobacco aroma,” he says.
One Marskiss stick provides users with the same level of satisfaction as two or three sticks of other HTP brands, according to Zilong. (Photo: Taco Tuinstra)
Longer Lasting Aroma
The nature and treatment of the tobacco makes all the difference, explains Zhan. “Our product uses high-quality natural tobacco as a carrier for our ‘aroma precursors,’ which is a featured technology of our product. At present, most HTP products on the market use food liquid fragrances to produce tobacco aroma. However, the resistance of food liquid fragrances to high temperature is weak, and the fragrances will be denatured and volatilized quickly with the increase of temperature, resulting in a shorter retention time of tobacco aroma. How to prolong the retention time of tobacco aroma? After years of research, our technical team found that natural tobacco and aromatic plants can be processed in a special procedure to obtain a comprehensive aroma, which produces fragrances of more lasting retention. This is what we call ‘the aroma precursor.’ The aroma precursor has much less impurity and more full-bodied, consistent and lasting tobacco flavor.”
According to Zhan, Marskiss sticks feature more advanced moisturizing technology than other HTPs, which makes their aerosols purer and fresher. Among other benefits, this prevents users from experiencing a dry mouth, which is a common problem associated with HTPs. To keep the moisturized tobacco fresh, Zilong has developed a special stick construction that includes a storage chamber for the tobacco and a more efficient filtering technique.
“The paper tube of our product has two layers—an outer layer and an inner layer—and we choose natural porous material as the inner layer coating to build a storage environment similar to a ceramic pot, which can capture the moisture from the tobacco section and keep it inside the tube so that the tobacco section will not become dry after the package has been opened for a period of time,” says Zhan.
The patented chamber lets the tobacco age naturally with storage, according to Zilong, which will result in a better taste. What’s more, the filter section of each Marskiss stick features a ball array filtration system so that the aerosol passes through a curved path formed between the gap in the ball array. “After layer upon layer [of] filtration, the aerosol becomes fresher and purer,” explains Zhan.
Marskiss sticks feature advanced moisturizing technology that keeps aerosols pure and fresh. Among other benefits, this prevents users from experiencing dry mouth. (Image: Zilong)
More Satisfying
Zilong claims its technology enables one Marskiss stick to provide users with the same level of satisfaction as two or three sticks of other HTP brands. By using lower, more balanced levels of nicotine salts, Marskiss also helps users avoid headaches associated with excessive nicotine salts.
Marskiss tobacco sticks come in five flavors and are matched by a device with a pre-heating time of 20 seconds that allows for 18 puffs or five minutes of use, which is about four puffs more than other brands. Initially, Zilong intends to launch Marskiss with blade heating technology. Down the road, the device will also be available with pin heating technology. “It is light-weight, slim and slick, and portable, and more importantly, it is a perfect match with our stick product that can heat the sticks to give the best experiences to users,” says Zhan.
In combination with the sticks’ patented filtering technology, the device reduces throat irritation and reduced dust to lungs, according to Zilong.
The company has invested €15 million ($16.25 million) in Marskiss so far. In preparation for launch, Zilong has started identifying markets and partners. According to Zhan, the product has performed well in consumer trials. “We have done several rounds of consumer testing in different markets and basically, we get pretty positive feedback from users, including distinctive and lasting tobacco aroma, no bad smell in mouth and room so that people around them do not object them from using our product, and no headache or coughing after using,” he says.
“We hope to tackle the pain points of the smokers, and we are committed to making the best [heat-not-burn] product,” says Zhan. “Please stay tuned for updates.”
Stefanie Rossel is Tobacco Reporter’s editorial contributor. An experienced trade journalist, she combines sharp reporting skills with in-depth knowledge of the tobacco and vapor industries. Prior to joining Tobacco Reporter, Stefanie was editor-in-chief at Tobacco Journal International, where she worked for a decade. Fluent in English, German and French, Stefanie covers tobacco news around the world. She is based in Germany.
The High Court of Justice in London ruled April 17 that Philip Morris Products’ (PMP) patents protecting a tobacco-heating technology are valid, reports Law360. The ruling represents a defeat for BAT and its Nicoventures subsidiary, which had sought to revoke PMP’s patents.
While considering the patent valid, the court also said that BAT’s Glo heated-tobacco products did not infringe the patents, heading off an infringement counterclaim filed by PMP.
The April 17 ruling is the latest chapter in an ongoing intellectual property dispute between the tobacco giants.
PMP initially sued BAT and Nicoventures, claiming they infringed several of its tobacco-heating technology patents. This prompted BAT and Nicoventures to file counterclaims seeking to invalidate the patents.
The proceedings have now branched off into several different actions before the High Court.
In the current case, Nicoventures argued, among other things, that the PMP technology was obvious in light of a 1998 patent application referred to as “Pienemann,” which covers a “system for providing an inhalable aerosol.”
While Pienemann, like PMP’s technology, has multiple heating elements, Judge Michael Tappin said that a skilled team would consider the multiple heaters to “mimic” one heater. Pienemann also did not specify the inclusion of a thin-film heater as seen in the PMP patent, instead describing a “graphite loaded sheath,” according to the judgment.
Regarding the infringement claim, Tappin said that BAT’s Glo products did not infringe the patents because they did not include a method of allowing different parts of the heating system to be heated at different times.
The government of South Korea has ditched a plan to raise the tax on heated-tobacco products just two days after the finance minister proposed the measure, reports The Korea Herald.
South Korea currently taxes regular cigarettes at higher levels than noncombustible tobacco products because it considers the former to be more harmful to health.
Combustible cigarettes attract a tax of KRW3,323 ($2.52) per pack, which includes a KRW1,007 tobacco excise tax, a KRW443 education tax, a KRW594 consumption tax, a KRW409 value-added tax, a KRW841 health promotion fee, a KRW24.4 waste charge and KRW5 to support tobacco farmers.
Noncombusted cigarettes, by contrast, are subject to a tax of KRW3,004, which represents 90.4 percent of the taxes imposed on regular tobacco products.
However, on April 17, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Finance Choo Kyung-ho said noncombusted cigarettes “should be treated similarly to regular cigarettes.”
His comments immediately provoked a public backlash, prompting the government to backtrack. The government “is not currently considering raising the tobacco tax at the moment,” the finance ministry said in a statement on April 19.
South Korea’s revenue from tobacco products has shrunk in recent years due to declining sales of combustible cigarettes. In 2022, the government collected KRW11.8 trillion in taxes on all tobacco products compared with KRW12 trillion in 2020. While sales of tobacco-heating products increased during the same periods, their comparably low volumes and lower tax rates meant that they did not offset the revenue lost due to declining cigarette sales.
Japan Tobacco will invest ¥300 billion ($2.25 billion) in its tobacco-heating products (THPs), with ¥200 billion designated for marketing the sticks internationally, reports Nikkei Asia
“Last year, we couldn’t make the investment because there were not enough [heated-tobacco] devices due to the semiconductor shortage,” Japan Tobacco President Masamichi Terabatake was quoted as saying. “For 2023, we are back on track for procurements, and we are able to secure more than twice Japan’s supply volume compared to last year.”
JT plans to roll out its Ploom X THP in more than 10 countries this year, reaching at least 20 new countries by the end of 2024. Currently available only in Japan and the U.K., the product is set to debut in Italy this month.
To gain name recognition, JT will invest in pop-up shops and digital sales. It will develop flavors that match the tastes of each market.
In the U.S., JT formed a joint venture with Altria Group. The partners will seek permission from the Food and Drug Administration to market Ploom by early 2025.
While JT’s THP segment is currently in the red due to the forward investments, the company anticipates turning a profit in 2028 on overseas growth.
JT will also invest in research and development, looking to develop the second generation and third generation of Ploom X devices.
Global sales volume for cigarettes shrank 1.5 percent last year, JT said. By contrast, the global market for THPs last year grew 17 percent to $33.4 billion, according to Euromonitor International.
SWM has published a manual to help regional manufacturers quickly launch tobacco-heating products.
By George Gay
Bruno Stefani
Bruno Stefani told me recently that his company’s aim was to help other companies develop, manufacture and market heated-tobacco products (HTPs). This came as no surprise, in fact; he is, after all, the HTP manager of SWM’s Reduced-Risk Products division, so what he said was more or less a statement of the division’s raison d’etre. But he went on to explain that the division’s focus was on regional cigarette manufacturers that had previously not entered the HTP market and that the aim was to have them launch products within 18 months to 24 months while continuing to operate in much the same way as they do when manufacturing combustible cigarettes. Each step of the process seems to have been designed with simplicity in mind and with the focus on targeting HTP products aligned with individual manufacturers’ brand profiles. Now, given the history of HTPs, which overall and until recently comprised about 30 years of market tests and failures, news of such a straightforward, rapid and all-encompassing offer did come as something of a surprise.
When the first commercially successful HTP products started to appear on the market, there was a veil of secrecy around them that most of us could penetrate only dimly. Of course, the veil started to lift as these products came under the scrutiny of those who were more qualified than most of us to figure out why they had been designed as they had been and how they performed as they did. And it started to lift further as the interests of those manufacturing these reduced-risk products were aligning with the release of information that was likely to increase their marketability in the eyes of consumers and, potentially, regulatory authorities.
It is not surprising, therefore, that now, much information about HTPs can be gleaned from the internet, though, I would suggest, it is surprising that it is possible to visit a website that outlines the way in which anybody interested in these once obscure products and with the necessary financial backing can be guided, from concept to marketplace, through the steps needed to become a manufacturer and supplier of such products. But, in fact, SWM, which has much expertise in the components that come together to make up an HTP, provides on its website a white paper that does just that.
The white paper, which is clear and concise, includes, in addition to an introduction and executive summary, chapters on what companies need to know before launching an HTP and dealing with an overview of the HTP market; eight reasons to make the leap into HTPs; overcoming obstacles; designing the heating device; designing the stick; building a blend; risks and regulations; and HTPs and the environment. There is also a chapter on expert solutions, and it is worth mentioning that SWM has invested €12 million ($12.88 million) in heat-not-burn R&D since 2013, as part of which it has assessed more than 40 different single tobacco grades under aerosol conditions. It has developed a unique puff-per-puff aerosol analyzer; it has presented at Coresta three scientific studies on HTPs; and, overall, it has more than eight years of HTP scientific and manufacturing expertise behind it.
Stefani told me during a telephone interview in early March that SWM offers a four-step process for developing and marketing an HTP from scratch. At its heart, the process involves providing a customer with know-how and access to ready-made components while avoiding tricky patent issues. The first step, discovery, is the one in which SWM demonstrates to a potential customer the workings and benefits of a number of HTP products. The second step, validation, involves a proof of concept in which characteristics, such as the taste profile and nicotine delivery level, are finalized in respect of a prototype.
The third step, industrialization, deals with how to manufacture and maintain the quality of the consumable sticks using the assets already available to the manufacturer. And the fourth step, the future, concerns preparing, immediately after launch of the first HTPs, the next generation of such products, which need to be placed on the market about every six months to keep the product portfolio looking fresh but which might involve only minor brand extensions.
To ensure a fast HTP development phase, SWM’s process is built around an already designed device and consumable stick. The device, which has been designed and would be manufactured by a third party with which SWM has worked and to which it would provide introductions, uses an “external” or oven system to heat the aerosol-generating material rather than an “internal” blade or pin. Choosing the external rather than the internal heating system reduces hugely the investment required because, whereas in the case of the latter, a greenfield plant must be constructed, the former allows a manufacturer to use, perhaps with minor modifications, its existing machinery. The third-party device supplier owns the patent to the device and ordinarily would be responsible for the after-sales obligations that attach to the supply of such electronic equipment.
At the same time, SWM can provide introductions to a filters company and to a machinery company in the case that modifications must be made to equipment while it is able to supply the consumable stick’s reconstituted tobacco for which it holds the patents.
But, in the end, it is down to the customer to mix into its primary department the reconstituted tobaccos specifically designed for HTP applications and other materials to produce personalized blends, much as it would do when making combustible cigarettes: adding other components, such as casings and flavors and even other reconstituted botanicals that, again, are designed specifically for HTP applications and that can be supplied by SWM. And it is, of course, down to the customer to sign off on the sensory experiences provided by the product.
Staying Competitive
Although the process sounds straightforward, the question arises, I suppose, as to why regional players should become involved in HTPs and if they should become involved, why, in general, they haven’t so far, even though, in conversations with Stefani, many have expressed considerable interest. There are at least three answers to the second question, one of which has to do with the disruptions caused by the Covid pandemic. Another reason has to do with some manufacturers already being involved in other projects that have left them for the time being without the resources necessary to embrace HTPs. And for some, there is no sense of urgency in moving to HTPs because, with the major manufacturers concentrating on new-generation products, the regional players are performing well on the market for combustible cigarettes and have not felt the chill wind of decline.
But it seems likely that if these regional players are to stay competitive in a world where combustible cigarettes are giving way to new-generation products of various kinds, they will need to get on board with HTPs and probably sooner rather than later. SWM says the combustible cigarette market is suffering a steady attrition that amounted to an estimated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about minus-4 percent between 2016 and 2022. Over the same period, HnB products enjoyed an estimated CAGR of about 70 percent, and, in some countries, the market share of HTPs was above 10 percent by the end of 2022. Within the EU, where most but not all of the target regional manufacturers operate, the cigarette/HnB transfer rate between 2016 and 2020 was plus-35 percent, meaning that for every 100 cigarette sales lost, HTP sales grew by 35 sticks.
Further, SWM estimates that the overall HTP CAGR between 2021 and 2027 is likely to be 15 percent to 20 percent while the CAGR for HTPs using external heating systems will be about 20 percent to 25 percent given that they are starting from a lower volume base.
Of course, confidence in the future for these devices is provided by the fact that, in many markets, they stand at a tax discount to combustible cigarettes, providing a potential retail price advantage that, in the case of HTPs with external heating systems especially, is bolstered by the relatively low cost of manufacturing disposable sticks. Such confidence must also be seen in the context of the investments that have been made in them and that is continuing to be made in them by the major players. And it is likely, too, that the entry into this market segment of regional players will build product exposure and market momentum.
The case for HTPs can be argued from a negative perspective as well. If a consumer of a regional player’s combustible cigarettes decides she wants to move to a less risky product, she will move to the product of a competitor if the regional manufacturer doesn’t offer a suitable product. And this would be an avoidable loss for the manufacturer in question. While it is not possible for a manufacturer to develop HTPs that exactly mimic the characteristics of its combustible brands, it can get close enough to present devices as new formats offering fresh experiences. This product/brand continuity, if you like, is important because while a consumer might be looking to move to a less risky product, she probably wants, too, to move to one manufactured by a company she already trusts.
George Gay is Tobacco Reporter’s European editor, but his territory spans the globe. Based in London, George has covered the tobacco industry since 1982, initially for a U.K.-based publication and since 2004 for Tobacco Reporter. George’s understanding of industry issues, combined with his keen sense of observation and dry wit, have earned him a loyal following among Tobacco Reporter’s readers.
Altria Group has exchanged its entire investment in Juul Labs for a non-exclusive, irrevocable global license to certain of Juul’s heated tobacco intellectual property.
“We believe exchanging our Juul ownership for intellectual property rights is the appropriate path forward for our business,” said Altria CEO Billy Gifford in a statement. “Juul faces significant regulatory and legal challenges and uncertainties, many of which could exist for many years. We are continuing to explore all options for how we can best compete in the e-vapor category.”
As of Dec. 31, 2022, the carrying value and estimated fair value of Altria’s Juul investment was $250 million. Altria will record the financial impact of the agreement in the first quarter of 2023 and intends to treat any such amounts as a special item and exclude it from its adjusted diluted earnings per share.
“The return of Altria’s equity stake and termination of underlying agreements affords us full strategic freedom—we are no longer limited by the terms of those agreements to pursue other strategic opportunities and partnerships,” wrote Juul in a statement. “We are free to take advantage of a range of options to maximize the value of our company while we continue to advance our leading product technology and innovation pipeline.”
In late 2018, Altria paid nearly $13 billion for a 35 percent stake in Juul. “We have long said that providing adult smokers with superior, satisfying products with the potential to reduce harm is the best way to achieve tobacco harm reduction,” said Altria’s then-CEO Howard Willard at the time. “Through Juul, we are making the biggest investment in our history toward that goal. We strongly believe that working with Juul to accelerate its mission will have long-term benefits for adult smokers and our shareholders.”
Over the years that followed, however, regulatory scrutiny and litigation relating to Juul’s marketing practices severely eroded Juul’s valuation. On June 23, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ordered Juul Labs to pull its e-cigarettes from U.S. store shelves, saying the e-cigarette manufacturer had submitted insufficient evidence that they were “appropriate for the protection of the public health.” After Juul challenged the marketing denial order (MDO), the FDA agreed to take another look at the company’s pre-market tobacco product application.
The agency said it had determined that there are scientific issues unique to the Juul application that warrant additional review.
In early September, Juul Labs agreed to pay nearly $440 million to settle a two-year investigation by 33 U.S. states into the marketing of its vaping products, which critics have blamed for sparking a surge in underage vaping.
On Sept. 30, Altria announced it was ending its noncompete agreement with Juul. The tobacco giant is reportedly in talks to buy Njoy Holdings for at least $2.75 billion. Njoy has a roughly 2 percent of the U.S. vape market by volume, according to Jefferies. Juul, by contrast, accounts for around a quarter of American vapor product sales. Unlike Juul, however, Njoy has FDA permission to sell its products in the U.S.
“While our appeal of FDA’s now-stayed MDO remains pending, we remain as confident in our science and evidence to support the continued marketing of Juul products,” Juul wrote after Altria announced the exchange of its investment for a license. “We also continue to pursue future applications for new products to accelerate our mission and progress for the adult smoker, public health, and an end to combustible cigarettes.”
Imperial Brands has launched the first all-new upgrade of its Pulze heated tobacco device, as it continues to innovate to create more compelling, potentially reduced harm products.
Pulze 2.0 offers new levels of convenience with a compact all-in-one design and 25 or more sessions from a single charge.
Paired with Imperial’s iD sticks now available in 10 different flavors, Pulze offers an attractive, potentially less risky alternative to consumers seeking to switch away from combustible cigarettes, according to Imperial.
“Our consumer-centric approach to innovation is accelerating the pace of development across all categories,” said Andy Dasgupta, Imperial Brands’ chief consumer officer, in a statement. “Pulze 2.0 is another important milestone on Imperial’s journey to build a healthier future and offers consumers alternative ways to enjoy moments of relaxation and pleasure.”
Heated tobacco devices such as Pulze release nicotine and tobacco aromas without burning and producing smoke. This means that aerosols produced by Pulze contain substantially lower levels of harmful chemicals than those found in cigarette smoke, research shows.
Pulze 2.0 is being launched initially in four markets—Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic and Greece—and will be rolled out more widely across Imperial’s heated tobacco footprint in Europe during the remainder of 2023.
Heated tobacco forms part of Imperial’s multi-category approach to building a strong, focused next generation products business. The company has also recently unveiled major product innovations in vape, with the new Blu 2.0 and Blu bar devices, and modern oral with nine new varieties of its fast-growing Zone X brand.
The launch of Pulze 2.0 comes as Imperial CEO Stefan Bomhard and CFO Lukas Paravicini today present on the progress of the business’ transformation at the Consumer Analyst Group of New York conference in Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
The presentation by Bomhard and Paravicini starts at 4 pm EST. Participants can register here.
