Category: Litigation

  • Glantz denies harassment

    Glantz denies harassment

    A post-doctoral researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, US, has accused her supervisor, Professor Stanton Glantz, of sexual harassment, according to a story by Emily Deruy for the San Jose Mercury-News.

    The allegations are contained in a lawsuit filed on Wednesday.

    The researcher, Eunice Neeley, said she had filed a sexual harassment complaint with the university. But the lawsuit, which names as defendants also the UC regents who oversee the system, alleges nothing was done to protect her. She alleges, too, that the school and Glantz retaliated by removing her name from a paper she had researched.

    Deruy reported that Glantz, whose formal title is the Truth Initiative Distinguished Professor of Tobacco Control’, did not immediately respond to a voicemail message seeking comment. In a blog post, though, he had denied the allegations.

    Glantz had revealed in the same post that a second woman had filed a complaint against him in March.

    ‘Based on the complaint filed last March I deny the claims made at that time,’ he wrote.

    The story is at: http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/12/07/researcher-accuses-ucsf-professor-of-leering-at-her-breasts-in-new-lawsuit/.

  • End-game just over horizon

    End-game just over horizon

    Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), US, is again calling for an end to cigarette sales.

    “It is time for cigarettes to be regulated in a way that is proportionate to the harm they cause,” said ASH executive director Laurent Huber.

    “In the 21st century, society is facing numerous public health challenges to which researchers are still searching for solutions.

    “We must unite to end the tobacco epidemic which has a known and clear path to eradication: ending the commercial sale of cigarettes.”

    In a press note issued through PRNewswire, ASH said that in September 2017 123 public health organizations representing 43 countries had echoed this sentiment with a letter to the CEO of Philip Morris International demanding that PMI implement its former human rights partner’s recommendation by immediately ceasing the production and marketing of tobacco.

    ‘While many Americans may not face assault from second-hand smoke on a daily basis anymore, that is not an indicator of a decline in the tobacco epidemic,’ the press note said. ‘The toll of tobacco products has moved to marginalized populations in the US and abroad.

    ‘Today, one person dies every 4.5 seconds from a tobacco-related disease. In the US, over half a million fathers, mothers, and children are snatched from us before their time every year. This catastrophe is completely preventable.

    ‘Tobacco companies profit by intentionally addicting their customers, and have been given a “get out of jail free” card for all the death and disease tobacco products inevitably cause.

    ‘But ASH is determined to see the end of the tobacco epidemic. We will continue to press to hold tobacco executives criminally liable – several cases are already pending.

    ‘And we will work to take cigarettes, and other combustible tobacco products, off the market. A world where tobacco is no longer sold for profit is just over the horizon.’

  • While you’re at it …

    While you’re at it …

    Now would be a good time for the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Surgeon General – two entities entrusted to give the public credible health information – to make corrective statements, according to a story by Sally Satel and Guy Bentley published by the American Enterprise Institute.

    Both agencies, the authors say, have committed public health malpractice by trying to scare people who can’t or won’t give up smoking while withholding or distorting data about viable alternatives.

    Satel and Bentley said that major US tobacco companies, such as Altria and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, had unveiled ‘primetime television commercials and full-page ads’ in more than 40 newspapers telling US citizens something they already knew: Smoking kills.

    ‘One ad says, “Altria, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA intentionally designed cigarettes to make them more addictive”,’ they pointed out.

    ‘Another reads: “More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined”.

    ‘The companies were ordered to make these “corrective statements” as the result of a 1999 lawsuit the Justice Department filed over the industry’s decades-long misleading statements about the effects of smoking.

    ‘They are a long-overdue correction by an industry that long tried to suppress the truth about the lethal effects of smoking…’

    The authors then go on to argue that the net of truth should be cast more widely.

    The story is at: https://www.aei.org/publication/feds-owe-the-public-corrective-statements-on-vaping/.

  • More litigation sought

    More litigation sought

    Governments should consider litigation against the tobacco industry to recover the ‘massive’ health care costs associated with the use of their products, according to a story in The Conversation based on a commentary published in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) yesterday.

    In the commentary, Dr, Ross MacKenzie, a lecturer in Health Studies at Macquarie University, along with his co-authors, Eric LeGresgley and Mike Daube, of the MJA, said that these costs were borne by Australia’s health care system.

    But there were now a number of reasons why this was an opportune time to consider legal action.

    Firstly, the costs were increasing. Tobacco was still a critical public health issue and remained the leading cause of preventable death, killing 15,000 Australians every year. Associated social and economic costs were estimated to be A$31 billion annually in 2008, and were now likely to be considerably greater.

    Secondly, anti-tobacco support was strong. Support for tobacco control in Australia remained strong, as had been demonstrated by standardized tobacco-packaging legislation and widespread political backing for tobacco tax increases.

    Thirdly, legal action was supported by the World Health Organization. Legal action was an increasingly important tobacco control instrument, whose value was recognised by the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which Australia had ratified.

    Fourthly, such litigation was already happening elsewhere. The tobacco industry had recently experienced a series of international legal setbacks including challenges to Australia’s standardized tobacco-packaging legislation.

    The story is at: https://theconversation.com/four-reasons-the-australian-government-should-consider-litigation-against-tobacco-companies-87511.

  • Murder, she suggested

    Murder, she suggested

    The idea that tobacco companies could face murder trials should be treated with contempt, according to a story by Rob Lyons on Spiked.

    Part of a Sunday Times report of November 12 that was reprinted on the ASH UK (Action on Smoking and Health) website on November 13 quoted the organization’s chief executive Deborah Arnott, as saying that, in the light of the Dutch action, ASH was assessing the feasibility of pressing the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute British American Tobacco, Philip Morris International, Imperial Brands and Japan Tobacco International, or obtaining permission for a private prosecution.

    “The lesson from the Netherlands is that the prospect of criminal charges has had a sensational impact,” Arnott said. “Smokers have been angry to find out low tar cigarettes are no healthier, because smokers inhale more tar and nicotine from low tar cigarettes than the tests show. Sick smokers have come forward in their thousands to take action against the industry.”

    According to the ASH rendition of the Times’ story, campaigners in nine countries are working on comparable cases. This followed a meeting of activists in Geneva this summer convened by ASH US.

    Lyons dismissed the two main grounds on which such prosecutions would apparently be based: that smokers were misled into believing that low-tar cigarettes were safer than were regular cigarettes, and that many people started smoking when they were children and should have been protected.

    Lyons said that anti-smoking campaigners were facing an existential crisis because they had largely won the argument about restricting people’s freedom to smoke; and that’s why they were now coming up with hare-brained strategies.

    It was high time that those people who believed in choice fought back, he said.

    Lyons piece is at: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/no-big-tobacco-is-not-murdering-people/20535#.Wg1RM4inxPZ.

    The ASH piece is at: http://ash.org.uk/media-and-news/ash-daily-news/ash-daily-news-13-november-2017/

  • Prices thrown into pot

    Prices thrown into pot

    If the price of legal marijuana must be competitive with black market marijuana to discourage underground sales, then the same logic should apply to nicotine products, according to a ctvnews.ca story quoting the head of Imperial Tobacco Canada.

    Governments across Canada are preparing for marijuana’s legalization in 2018 and are creating legislative frameworks to regulate the industry. Bill Blair, the federal MP tasked with leading the drug’s legalization in Canada, has said the provinces generally agree that the price of legal marijuana should be roughly the same or lower than that of the marijuana that can be found on the street.

    And Imperial’s Jorge Araya said that same rationale should apply to nicotine products.

    Imperial wasn’t lobbying for lower taxes for traditional cigarettes but was against future increases as well as the federal government’s plan to require standardized packaging, he said.

    Araya is lobbying also for a competitive tax regime for what he calls “less-risky” nicotine products, such as heat-not-burn products and electronic cigarettes, which, he says, represent the future of the industry.

    “The first step is to stop tax increases provincially and federally because we are getting to a level where illegal tobacco is booming in the country,” Araya said in an interview after a speech organized by Quebec’s main employers’ association.

    About 70 percent of the price of a pack of cigarettes was taxes, he said, and the illegal market in Canada represented 25 percent of sales and billions a year in lost revenue for governments.

    “We will always advocate for very high taxation with (traditional) cigarettes,” he said. “We have to pay for the externalities and health impacts that we create – what we don’t want is to go higher than we are today,” he said.

    Imperial Tobacco supports Bill S-5, which is making its way through the Senate and would legalize nicotine-containing vaping products in the country.

    But Araya said the company was against the provision forcing companies to have standardized packaging for cigarettes because that would hinder the consumer’s ability to differentiate between products and with the black market.

    Sindy Souffront, spokesperson for Health Canada, said in an email that vaping products, including e-cigarettes and e-liquids that contain nicotine, currently required authorization from Health Canada before they could be imported, advertised or sold in Canada.

    “To date, no such products have been approved,” she said. “Under Bill S-5, manufacturers and importers of a vaping product containing nicotine would not be required to seek Health Canada approval, provided that the product does not make therapeutic health claims.”

    Araya said that Imperial wanted to discuss nicotine products with the government and reach an agreement on how to treat taxation in a “very sustainable way”.

    Meanwhile, a Quebec anti-tobacco coalition said it was misleading to treat tobacco like marijuana because tobacco, unlike pot, was tied to tens of thousands of deaths a year.

    Flory Doucas, the group’s spokesperson, said “the goal of (Araya’s) speech was to rally the business community to the defence and interests of cigarette companies by stoking fear regarding new anti-tobacco measures and to publicize their new products.”

    While Imperial Tobacco is lobbying the government on regulation, it is also waiting for a major court ruling that could force the company to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to smokers.

    In 2015, a Quebec judge ordered three major cigarette companies, including Imperial Tobacco, to pay $15 billion to smokers as part of a class-action lawsuit.

    The companies made arguments to the Quebec Court of Appeal about a year ago and are awaiting a decision.

    Araya said his company isn’t ruling out going to the Supreme Court of Canada if it lost the appeal.

    “Yeah, that’s one of the avenues, to go to the Supreme Court,” he said. “But at the moment that would be speculation. We are very confident about the strength of our arguments.”

  • Packaging challenge fails

    Packaging challenge fails

    Swedish Match has lost a court case it filed against Norway’s government over recently-imposed restrictions on the packaging of snus, according to a Reuters story.

    The company had asked for a temporary injunction against regulations that the government imposed to standardize tobacco-product packaging.

    The government argued that the new rules on packaging had been drawn up in the interests of public health.

  • Smokeless ban struck down

    Smokeless ban struck down

    The Gauhati High Court has struck down the Assam Health Act of 2013, which had sought to ban all forms of smokeless tobacco, according to a story in the Telegraph relayed by the TMA.

    The Assam Health Act of 2013 prohibited the manufacturing, advertisement, trade, storage, distribution, sale and consumption of products such as zarda, gutkha and pan masala containing tobacco and nicotine.

    And according to the report, it contained a provision requiring that all violators serve a minimum three-year prison sentence.

    The court ruled that it was beyond the powers of the state legislature to pass this law because that power resided only with the national parliament.

    Senior additional advocate-general Devjit Saikia confirmed that the act had been set aside but could not give details because the order will be received only on Monday.

  • Public statements sought

    Public statements sought

    Australian anti-smoking advocates say that a US court order forcing tobacco companies to air statements about the dangers of smoking should be mirrored in Australia, according to a story in The Guardian.

    Public health experts have written to the Australian heads of tobacco companies calling on them to run statements about the lethal nature of smoking and the addictiveness of smoking and nicotine.

    The advocates want the companies also to reveal their deliberate attempts to make tobacco products more addictive.

    In 2012, the Guardian said, the US federal court ordered major tobacco companies to run statements in the media admitting they had deceived US consumers for decades about the dangers of smoking. That decision had been upheld by the court in April, and the first of the statements was due to air next month in leading newspapers and on the ABC, CBS and NBC television networks.

    The statements are due to run weekly for one year and are said to be costing the companies millions of dollars.

    The court case has prompted a coalition of public health experts to write to the heads of British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in Australia calling on them to tell the truth about their tobacco products in a similar campaign.

    ‘We hope that you will share our view that Australians are entitled to the same level of information as the American public about these companies’ deceitful practices and the ways in which these companies and the tobacco industry more broadly have lied to the public and your consumers over decades,’ the letter states.

  • Mighty tax case closed

    Mighty tax case closed

    The Philippines’ government is expected to earn about P40 billion from a compromise deal over the tax liabilities of Mighty Corporation, according to a story in The Manila Bulletin quoting the Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II.

    Aguirre said he did know the exact figure but that it was about P40 billion.

    And because of the deal, the Bureau of Internal Revenue had withdrawn three tax evasion complaints it had filed with the Department of Justice against the tobacco company.

    Under the Philippines’ National Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, settling a tax case was allowed, and so the case was closed and the government richer by P40 billion, Aguirre said.

    The settlement agreement over the tax liabilities was reached after Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) acquired Mighty Corporation in September.