Category: PMTA

  • FDA Rejects First Menthol Product PMTAs

    FDA Rejects First Menthol Product PMTAs

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) for several menthol-flavored vaping products marketed by Logic Technology Development. The products include the Logic Pro Menthol e-Liquid Package and Logic Power Menthol e-Liquid Package. It’s the first time the FDA has issued MDOs for menthol products after receiving a scientific review.

    The move seems inline with the regulatory agency’s goal to ban menthol flavors from tobacco products. The FDA also isn’t expected to approve any flavored vaping product other than tobacco.

    “Ensuring new tobacco products undergo premarket evaluation is a critical part of the FDA’s work to reduce tobacco-related disease and death,” said Brian King, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), in a release. “We remain committed to evaluating new tobacco products based on a public health standard that considers the risks and benefits of the tobacco product to the population as a whole.”

    Gregory Conley, director of legislative and external affairs for the American Vapor Manufacturers Association, told Tobacco Reporter that the latest move by the FDA to ban menthol vaping flavors is reminiscent of the agency’s “fatal flaw” review of PMTAs that resulted in millions of denials. The term “fatal flaw” was used by the FDA for PMTA submissions that didn’t have specific studies. The term has been at the center of nearly all lawsuits filed against the FDA for its handling of the PMTA process.

    “The dysfunction at the FDA knows no bounds. For the last year-plus, the FDA has sat back deferred decision making on menthol vaping products,” Conley said. “Lest anyone believe that FDA was hard at work coming up with ways to achieve balance, today they revealed that their big plan for menthol vaping products is to follow the exact same ‘fatal flaw’ review process that has led to dozens of lawsuits being filed against the agency.”

    The agency stated that after reviewing the company’s premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs), the FDA determined that the applications “lacked sufficient evidence to demonstrate that permitting the marketing of the products would be appropriate for the protection of the public health (APPH), the applicable standard legally required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.”

    The FDA stated that the evidence provided within Logic’s denied PMTAs did not demonstrate that menthol-flavored e-cigarettes are more effective in promoting “complete switching or significant cigarette use reduction” relative to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.

    Logic must now decide if it will resubmit its applications or submit new applications to address the deficiencies for the products that are subject to the MDOs. However, these acts could prove futile since the FDA states that for non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes, including menthol-flavored e-cigarettes, “existing evidence demonstrates a known and substantial risk” with regard to youth appeal, uptake and use.

    “The FDA conducts a rigorous, scientific review of submitted premarket tobacco product applications, evaluating the data for each product to determine if it meets the public health standard,” said King. “In this case, the applicant did not provide sufficient scientific evidence to show that the potential benefit to adult smokers outweighs the risks to youth.”

    A recently accepted manuscript of an article set for publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research found that flavored vaping and other tobacco sales restrictions in California did not affect youth e-cigarette use.

    The MDO letter that Logic received today is not limited to the two products named above, according to the agency. In general, the FDA publicly names only products that the applicant is marketing to avoid potential disclosure of confidential commercial information.

    Any products subject to an MDO may not be offered for sale or distributed in the United States, or the FDA may take enforcement action. These products cannot be legally introduced into interstate commerce in the U.S. without risking FDA enforcement. In March, the FDA authorized several tobacco-flavored e-cigarette products from the company under the Logic Vapeleaf, Logic Power and Logic Pro brands, including devices. 

    In addition to ensuring that Logic complies with this order, the FDA intends to ensure compliance by distributors and retailers. Specifically, the FDA notes that all new tobacco products on the market without the “statutorily required premarket authorization” are marketed unlawfully and their distribution or sale is subject to enforcement action.

    Recently, the U.S. Department of Justice filed complaints for permanent injunctions in federal district courts against six e-cigarette manufacturers on behalf of the FDA. The cases represent the first time the FDA has initiated injunction proceedings to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act’s premarket review requirements for new tobacco products.

    Retailers should contact Logic with any questions about products in their inventory. 

  • Court Refuses to Suspend Fontem MDO

    Court Refuses to Suspend Fontem MDO

    A U.S. appeals court denied Fontem US’ request to suspend the Food and Drug Administration’s marketing denial orders (MDO) for certain Myblu products.

    On April 8, the FDA rejected several of the company’s premarket tobacco product applications on the basis that they lacked sufficient evidence to show that permitting the marketing of those products would be appropriate for the protection of public health.

    The court rejected Fontem’s July 12 request for a stay, saying that the e-cigarette company had waited too long to file the motion.

    “Fontem has demonstrated that the marketing denial order is causing it harm, but by waiting more than two months after the marketing denial order’s issuance to seek emergency relief, Fontem weakened its claim of irreparable harm,” the court wrote.

    The court also stated that Fontem “has not made a strong showing” that it is likely to succeed in its appeal of the MDO on merits.

    “The court ruling does not affect our progress through the FDA’s administrative appeals process, through which we intend to convince the agency that approval should be granted for Myblu products,” said a spokesperson for Fontem US.

    “In the meantime we continue to supply Myblu to the majority of retailers. The MDO does not apply to Blu disposables which constitute 50 percent of Blu share in the U.S. market.”

  • Joytech Parent Submits PMTA to FDA

    Joytech Parent Submits PMTA to FDA

    China-based JWEI has announced today that they have successfully submitted a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for a device created with “new innovative technology” that focuses on safety, harm reduction and is designed to curb underage use.

    “JWEI has been a leader in this industry from the start and this milestone again reiterates our commitment to the industry and public health: ensuring our adult customers continued access to less harmful alternatives to traditional tobacco products, while setting a new standard preventing underage youth access.” said VP of JWEI Group Jason Yao.

    JWEI is the parent to the brands Joytech, Eleaf, Wismec and Joyevita. The company did not offer additional information on the specific device submitted for the PMTA.

    JWEI developed a set of principles to guide through every step of its new product development, led by safety and effectiveness studies in early 2019. “The design philosophy is the foundation and guide rails for designing, manufacturing, verifying, validating, and continuously improving innovative, responsible, reliable, and high-quality products,” the release states.

    The limited product debut in the UK has received overwhelming recognition from users and commercial partners after a few months’ actual use, according to JWEI

    “As one of the world-leading device manufacturers and innovators of e-cigarette and vaping products, JWEI has over 3,600 granted patents and multiple internationally recognized manufacturing and quality certifications (GMP, HACCP, ISO9001, ISO13485, EHS, and ERP),” according to a press release.

  • Juul: FDA ‘Overlooked’ Aerosol Data

    Juul: FDA ‘Overlooked’ Aerosol Data

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration overlooked a key part of Juul’s premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) when the agency ordered Juul Labs’ products off the U.S. market, according to court documents.

    In court filings Tuesday, Juul said the agency overlooked more than 6,000 pages of data that the company had submitted to the FDA on the aerosols that users inhale, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    Juul also said the agency failed to consider the totality of Juul’s evidence, which the company said established that the public-health benefits of Juul products significantly outweighed the potential risks.

    “FDA’s order acknowledged that ‘exposure to carcinogens and other toxicants present in cigarette smoke were greatly reduced with exclusive use’ of Juul products compared with combustible cigarettes,” Juul Labs stated in court documents.

    A federal appeals court last week granted Juul Labs a temporary stay of the FDA’s marketing denial order that requires the vaping company to pull its e-cigarettes off the U.S. market.

    “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider petitioner’s forthcoming emergency motion for stay pending court review and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the court wrote.

    The FDA has until July 7 to respond to Juul’s motion and Juul Labs has until July 12 to reply to the FDA response if submitted.

  • Marketing Approvals for NJOY ‘Daily’ Vapes

    Marketing Approvals for NJOY ‘Daily’ Vapes

    Photo: NJOY

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA) for NJOY’s Daily Rich Tobacco 4.5% and NJOY Daily Extra Rich Tobacco 6%.

    “It should be noted that our determination that the marketing of these products is APPH [appropriate for the protection of public health] is based in part on the submitted microbial stability data,” the agency wrote in its marketing granted order (MGO).

    The designation does not mean the products are safe and they are not “FDA approved,” the agency said, but the MGOs allows the NJOY to legally market the authorized products in the United States.

    While approving NJOY’s Daily Rich Tobacco 4.5% and NJOY Daily Extra Rich Tobacco 6%, the FDA denied authorization for multiple other Daily e-cigarette products. These are presumed for products with nontobacco flavors. Any of those products that remain on the market must be removed or risk FDA enforcement, the agency said. Applications for two menthol-flavored Daily products remain under FDA review.

    Additionally, the authorization imposes marketing restrictions on the company to greatly reduce the potential for youth exposure to advertising for these products. The FDA said it will closely monitor how these products are marketed and will act as necessary if the company fails to comply with any applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, or if there is a notable increase in the number of non-smokers—including youth—using these products.

    On April 26, the FDA authorized four NJOY Ace products through the PMTA pathway.

  • Senator Calls on U.S. FDA to End Enforcement Discretion

    Senator Calls on U.S. FDA to End Enforcement Discretion

    Photo: Tobacco Reporter Archive

    In a speech on the Senate floor, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin blasted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its delays in completing its public health review of e-cigarette premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). The deadline for the FDA to finish reviewing e-cigarette applications was Sept. 9, 2021, more than eight months ago.

    On June 13, the regulatory agency submitted an update on the agency’s review of e-cigarette applications and stated it will not finish reviewing e-cigarettes until July 2023 and that products under review may continue being sold.

    “These companies have flooded the market with addictive devices. Companies like Juul, partially owned by the tobacco companies, understand that they’ve promoted their products to children,” Durbin said, according to a release from his office. “For years, none of these products were legally authorized. Who was supposed to be the cop on the beat? The Food and Drug Administration, but they were nowhere to be found.”

    In March, Durbin led a bipartisan letter with 14 of his colleagues calling on the FDA to finish its review of e-cigarettes immediately; reject applications for e-cigarettes, especially kid-friendly flavors, that do not prove they will benefit the public health; and clear the market of all unapproved e-cigarettes.

    “I am calling on the FDA to immediately halt its enforcement discretion and remove all unauthorized e-cigarettes from the market,” Durbin stated. “Don’t allow Juul and other tobacco companies one more day of endangering our children. Stop cowering before Big Tobacco’s highly paid lawyers.”

  • FDA Hands Court PMTA Status Report

    FDA Hands Court PMTA Status Report

    Photo: Tobacco Reporter Archive

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has submitted a status report for products that currently have a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) under review. The regulatory agency states that it expects to have resolved 63 percent of the applications set out in its original priority by June 30, 2022, and 72 percent of the applications in its original priority set by the end of this year.

    “The FDA’s progress largely reflects the review priorities that the agency established in 2020, when review began. Given the large influx of concurrent applications, the FDA prioritized review of applications from manufacturers with the greatest market share at the time because decisions on those applications were expected to have the greatest impact on public health,” the report states. “As a result, the FDA allocated significant resources to review applications from the five companies whose brands represented over 95 percent of the e-cigarette market at that time: Fontem (blu), Juul, LogicNjoy and R.J. Reynolds (Vuse).”

    In the order requiring the FDA to submit status reports, the Maryland court stated that covered applications are limited to applications for products that are sold under the brand names Juul, Vuse, Njoy, Logic, blu, SMOK, Suorin or Puff Bar. Additionally, any product with a reach of 2 percent or more of total “Retail Dollar Sales” in Nielsen’s Total E-Cig Market & Players or Disposable E-Cig Market & Players reports.

    To determine which applications are for products sold under the listed brand names, the FDA used its internal PMTA database, which organizes applications by manufacturer, according to the agency. The FDA searched its database for the brand names to identify the manufacturers related to each relevant brand name and then searched its database to identify applications submitted by the manufacturers.

    The FDA stated that it had conferred with the plaintiffs in the case who agreed that only one brand beyond those listed meets the 2 percent threshold. That brand was not identified. Of those applications the FDA deems requiring status reports, the agency stated that it had identified 240 covered applications. The agency estimates that, based on current information, the FDA will take action on:

    • 51 percent of covered applications by June 30, 2022;
    • 52 percent of covered applications by Sept. 30, 2022;
    • 56 percent of covered applications by Dec. 31, 2022;
    • 56 percent of covered applications by March 31, 2023; and
    • 100 percent of covered applications by June 30, 2023.

    The agency also states that not every covered application has an equal potential impact on the public health. For example, more than 25 percent of the covered applications are for products not currently on the market.

    The FDA identified two applications for products sold under the relevant brand names where the applicant stated that the products were not on the market as of Aug. 8, 2016. The FDA also identified three other applications for products sold under the relevant brand names where the applicant did not state whether the products were on the market as of Aug. 8, 2016. The FDA has not included information about these five applications in the current status report.

    “Also, some e-cigarette devices consist of a small number of components, resulting in a small number of individual product applications for the entire system. A disposable prefilled device, for example, could constitute a single product with one application. Other e- cigarette devices, by contrast, consist of many components with separate tanks, coils, tubes and pods, resulting in dozens of separate product applications for a single system,” the status report states. “Of the covered applications that the FDA anticipates will remain to be resolved beyond the end of 2022, more than half are for components of a limited number of e-cigarette device systems representing under 2.5 percent of the e-cigarette market. The FDA has made and will continue to make significant progress in reviewing and resolving applications for e-cigarette products to achieve the greatest impact on public health.”

    The agency stated that it will file another status report by July 29, 2022, that will include any revisions to the estimates disclosed in the first report.

  • Marketing Orders for Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro

    Marketing Orders for Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on May 12 gave R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (RJRVC) permission to continue marketing the original-flavor varieties of its Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro products. In October 2021, the FDA authorized the marketing of Vuse Solo original flavor.

    “These authorizations represent the broadest portfolio of market authorizations provided to any company in the U.S for premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA),” said David O’Reilly, director of scientific research at RJRVC’s parent company, BAT, in a statement. “Continued focus on science and innovation has supported the robust submissions, which have enabled FDA to evaluate and authorize the marketing of these products.

    “We are proud of the work undertaken by the team to achieve this significant regulatory milestone and are confident in the quality of our applications.”

    While approving the original-flavor varieties, the FDA denied RJRVC’s applications for the marketing of Vuse-branded products with other flavors. Those flavored vapor products are not currently marketed or sold in the U.S., according to BAT. The company says it is reviewing the FDA’s decision on those applications to determine next steps.

    RJRVC’s application to market menthol-flavored Vuse products remains under FDA review and those products can remain on market pending a decision from the agency.

  • PMTA Deadline Approaching

    PMTA Deadline Approaching

    Courtesy: US FDA

    Manufacturers of nontobacco nicotine (NTN) products on the market as of April 14, 2022, that wish to continue to market their products are required to submit a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration by May 14, 2022.

    The May 14 deadline is only for applicants submitting electronically, as required by the FDA. Applicants can, however, request a waiver from the FDA to submit a PMTA in a different format. An application submitted in hard copy must be received by the FDA no later than 4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Friday, May 13.

    The FDA received from the U.S. District Court of Maryland a 14-day extension to file the first PMTA status reports required by the court’s revised remedial order on April 29.

    “The extension request is supported by good cause. Compiling the information needed for the status report has required considerable time and effort, and defendants have been working with plaintiffs to resolve any ambiguities about which applications will be covered in the status report,” the motion states.

    The new law additionally provides that an NTN product with a tobacco-derived “previous version” that received a negative action on a PMTA from the FDA, such as a refuse-to-file or marketing denial order, may not continue to be marketed after May 14, 2022, without receiving a marketing granted order from the FDA.

    Such products must be removed from the market, even if a new PMTA is submitted, until the marketing granted order is received, according to the agency. Products on the market after July 13, 2022, without an FDA marketing granted order are in violation of section 910 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and may be subject to FDA enforcement.

    For products not on the market on April 14, 2022, a PMTA must be submitted to the FDA and marketing authorization must be received before the product can be sold in the United States.

  • FDA Gets Until May 16 to File PMTA Reports

    FDA Gets Until May 16 to File PMTA Reports

    Courtesy: US FDA

    UPDATE: The order has been granted. First reports are due May 16.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is asking the U.S. District Court of Maryland for a 14-day extension to file the first status report required by the Court’s revised remedial order.

    The plaintiffs in the case consent to the requested extension, according to the motion filed today.

    “The extension request is supported by good cause. Compiling the information needed for the status report has required considerable time and effort, and Defendants have been working with
    Plaintiffs to resolve any ambiguities about which applications will be covered in the status report,” the motion states. “Also, a number of FDA employees helping to prepare the status report were out of the office on pre-planned leave last week, and a key FDA employee responsible for the status report will be out of the country on pre-planned leave next week.

    “Defendants do not seek to modify any other deadline, and the FDA’s second status report would remain due July 28, 2022. Defendants are prepared to have this letter serve as their consent motion for a 14-day extension.”

    Judge Grimm is expected to grant the motion’s request. The new deadline for first PMTA status reports would be May 16 if motion is granted.