Tag: instrumentation

  • All Eyes on Harm Reduction

    All Eyes on Harm Reduction

    Photo: Borgwaldt KC

    Suppliers of instrumentation and lab services are focusing on novel nicotine products.

    By Stefanie Rossel

    Two things are for sure: Instrumentation and lab service suppliers don’t have any time to be idle. And a look at their most recent innovations conveys a good idea about where the nicotine industry is heading.

    Two years ago, instrumentation manufacturers and providers of laboratory services were busy supporting makers of electronic nicotine-delivery systems (ENDS) with their submissions for premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    “It certainly has been an interesting two years for ENDS manufacturers,” says Chris Allen, chief executive officer of Broughton, a U.K.-based contract research organization helping companies with delivering full-service regulatory projects.

    Chris Allen

    “In the last few weeks, there have been marketing denial orders (MDOs) for multiple Myblu and Juul products as well as three high-profile manufacturers being awarded marketing orders for their products. Broughton is thrilled to have played a significant part in the granting of some of these marketing orders, and we expect more to come soon.

    “With these five separate PMTA decisions, the FDA has given the industry an indication of where the bar is set for gaining a marketing order. It also gives additional insight into its evaluation process as the rationale behind the Myblu and Juul MDOs were very different. Although not everyone benefited from these decisions directly, they have given manufacturers new confidence to move forward with product development and future business roadmap decisions.”

    Nicotine companies are now considering new PMTA applications, modified-risk tobacco product (MRTP) applications and marketing authorization applications for products under European Medicines Agency regulation. “The industry isn’t losing its appetite or ambition for innovation and new product development,” says Allen. The PMTA process is now firmly established as one of the costs of selling next-generation nicotine products in the U.S., and manufacturers have adapted to this and are moving forward.”

    In addition to full-service solutions, Allen observes a significant interest in Broughton’s standalone services, such as toxicological assessments and laboratory services, many of which are in support of preparing for or responding to PMTA deficiencies. “Unfortunately, many companies have been provided with a substandard service for their PMTAs. Now [that] we have understood the bar for gaining approval, many companies are requesting us to provide extra evidence to submit before their applications enter into substantive review.”

    Focus on Reduced-Risk Products

    Joost Elvers

    Reduced-risk product (RRP) testing continues to be at the core of instrumentation suppliers’ business. “The industry as well as governmental organizations still have a strong focus on new-generation products like e-cigarettes and heated-tobacco products (HTPs),” notes Joost Elvers, group leader of key account management at Borgwaldt KC, a German manufacturer of quality control instruments and devices that is part of the Hauni group of companies, which also includes metrology specialist Sodim. “New product designs combined with upcoming further regulations and standardizations will continuously require close support,” says Joost. “Besides, the combustible product category experienced a focus revival with the opening of markets to cannabis and hemp products. We are therefore strengthening our portfolio of quality control equipment for the different product categories as well as our broad range of emissions testing devices. Furthermore, with the reduction of Covid-19 measures in companies and countries, our team of service engineers has increased its service activities again to support our customers on site in addition to the remote services that have been introduced over the last 2.5 years.”

    U.K.-based Cerulean is focusing on three tobacco-related areas, according to Ian Tindall, head of innovation and marketing.

    “The first is supporting companies within the ever-expanding heated-tobacco product market,” he says. “This still requires a lot of specialist equipment to generate information needed in support of MRTP applications as well as other product development activities.

    “Also, with increasing amounts of products coming to full-scale production, we are finding routine quality assurance equipment is definitely an area we see as expanding. Partly, we are addressing this need by working with our sister company G.D in providing closed-loop control for makers and combiners and partly, it is rolling out and deploying our X-ray equipment to monitor combiner output.

    “A second area we are really excited about is in producing routine test equipment for modern oral products as we see this as a rapidly growing area where quality assurance can be automated and improved. We launched a product, the Orion, just for this market, and we have received almost overwhelming positive feedback from companies.

    “The final area is in supplying test equipment for the safe regulation of legal recreational cannabis use in the United States. We have rapidly found that this is not another cigarette-type application, and we are learning alongside clients how to ensure the safety and compliance to regulation of these now legal products.”

    While the Orion is currently one of Cerulean’s most sought-after products, Tindall has detected another trend, which he finds difficult to describe. “It’s the service that starts with a customer saying, ‘I want to measure something, but I am not quite sure what,’” says Tindall. “The service is about working with customers to develop test and measurement equipment for new-to-the-world products that have no background of tests to ensure conformance.”

    While Cerulean’s commitment to customer confidentiality prevents Tindall from elaborating on current projects, he cites the example of a customer who wants to prevent burst capsules from wetting tipping paper. “We might come up with a way to measure the radial and longitudinal positioning of the capsule in the filter, which prevents liquid getting too close to the outside tipping paper,” he says.

    New Testing for New Products

    Cerulean’s Orion

    Cerulean’s Orion, the first automated snus test station to enter the market, is but one example of an array of innovations for testing novel nicotine products. Currently, the Orion measures the weight, length and width of the pouch along with the tensile strength of the pouch seams as well as extension against load.

    “We will, before the end of Q3, deploy extra measurements in the form of longitudinal pouch seam position and overlap, pouch transverse seam size and pouch moisture,” says Tindall. “We are listening to the customer base and expect to be adding further enhancements in the future once we have really established what is important to our customers, including the potential for auto-sampling and feedback to a maker to reduce reject rates. We expect Orion to follow the trajectory of most of our products in that it will be developed and enhanced as our customers’ needs change.” The Orion can be used for all types of modern oral pouches as long as the size fits in the maximum and minimum dimensions allowed and the pouches follow a rectilinear format.

    Sodim recently introduced a test station dedicated to the testing of HTP consumables. “HTP and RRP confront us with many challenges, such as different format compatibility and new measurement request,” says Christine Camilleri, director of sales and marketing at Sodim.

    “This, combined with sustainability, guides our development team toward instruments [that are] fully scalable, responding to the needs of this market as regards to quick product changes. All our test stations are compatible with HTP products of any size. Multiple diameter measurements on filter rods are an example.”

    From Borgwaldt comes the LM1E DtL, a new vaping machine that provides direct-to-lung testing. ISO 20768 requires aerosol to fill the mouth before entering the lung, which is commonly named mouth-to-lung vaping.

    Consumers, however, tend to vape different products differently. Borgwaldt KC developed the LM1E-DtL based on the draft development standard of CEN/TC437. “This vaping machine fulfills the requirements of an additional vaping regimen considering inhalation from an electronic cigarette directly into the lung,” explains Elvers. “As you can easily imagine, the emissions composition differs from that generated under the ISO 20768 process and therefore reflects the consumer exposition much better.”

    Design Support 

    The industry’s focus on RRPs is reflected in the demand for lab services too. With nicotine pouches, one of the most rapidly growing segments within the reduced-risk category, Broughton is seeing much interest in its consulting and testing services. “There are some interesting innovations around oral pouch materials, so our feeling is that the scope for oral pouches will grow beyond nicotine. The products are covered by the PMTA process within the U.S., so we have been busy providing support for these applications. Within the EU, any work performed is typically to support product development and/or due diligence. As per the ENDS analysis, the focus is placed upon nicotine content and HPHCS [harmful and potentially harmful constituents]. However, automated (flow-through) dissolution analysis is widely used to support the R&D process.”

    Broughton is also offering development services for next-generation products as well as for cannabinoids, another big theme in the sector. The company already has a medicinal cannabis and CDB business. For novel nicotine products, it has launched a division that helps customers design their products in a way that increases the chance of regulatory approval, for example by ensuring that development decisions taken early in a project support the later stages of a planned regulatory submission or go-to-market strategy.

    “This could be early development material or ingredient selection to expedite extractables and leachable studies or ensuring product designs are suitable for mass-market manufacturing scale-up,” says Allen. “Our services are completely scalable to the needs of the client so we can help with one stage of product realization or work as an extension of an in-house development team all through the product lifecycle. We created the service in response to requests from existing clients, so we know there is a demand for this sort of expert advice and consultancy.”

    As far as trends are concerned, Allen sees growth in the diversity of nicotine-delivery systems. “There are more heated-tobacco products, more modern oral nicotine pouch manufacturers plus innovations like water-based vape devices and new heating mechanisms,” he says. “Disposable vape devices are also growing in popularity, and there are some exciting innovations around device material selection, especially focused on improving the recyclability of products, which we predict will be very important in the future. At Broughton, we work with a wide variety of ENDS manufacturers of different sizes and backgrounds. We are seeing a lot of new technology coming from regions like the Middle East, India and Indonesia in addition to where you’d expect it to come from, such as the USA and China. It really is a very dynamic industry with lots of new players looking to bring something different and differentiated to the market.”

    Greener Measurements

    While flexibility plays an important role in novel-products testing equipment, Borgwaldt KC and Sodim have also noticed growing demand for sustainability. “We can currently see two trends gaining momentum within our customer base. One is for sure the change in available product portfolios of some of our customer groups; the other is the realization of sustainability targets in the instruments environment,” explains Elvers.

    “We therefore spend many efforts in making flexible emissions testing solutions for combustible cigarettes and cigars as well as for the new electronic product segment of ENDS. The successful launch of the 10-port vaping machine NGX10 and its continuous modularization with further add-ons shows us the high demand for such a modern and ENDS-dedicated solution on the market. Besides this, the trend of rethinking life cycles of instruments and how they can be converted for new demands to save resources made us create our ‘lifetime extension’ program in which we update older instruments with the newest measuring technology by fully building upon existing infrastructure and reusing or refurbishing existing parts for a more sustainable outcome.”

    Camilleri notes that customers are moving to “green” products, such as hemp and cannabis. “On physical parameters, they are aiming to get fast measuring solutions in a quickly changing market,” she says. “Specific developments become the norm compared to standard solutions in the past. We orientate our products on super flexible instruments adapted to different market environments and production allowing long-term evolution of test stations, including the possibility to upgrade them to cater to new product trends. Our products can have several lives in different segments of the industry, reducing the impact on the environment.”

    Christine Camilleri

    Testing Without Standards

    As more countries legalize cannabis, instrumentation makers detect new opportunities—even though testing standards are not yet in place. “Weight is currently the most important parameter, but we also see a new interest to measure the same physical parameters as in conventional cigarettes to improve the quality of the products and reduce cost generated by waste,” says Camilleri, whose company has adapted its Sodiline and Sodiqube test stations to cannabis testing.

    Borgwaldt and Sodim are active in the raw material and emissions testing segments of cannabis products. “Combined with the experience gained with production machines of our sister companies Garbuio and Hauni, we established ourselves as a main contact point for raw material and production control as well as emissions testing for cannabis products,” says Elvers.

    Borgwaldt has developed an electrostatic precipitation trap, HV1, which is used to trap emissions for the analysis of metals. Being a phytoextracting plant, cannabis collects and saves metals from the soil so that these elements will be released during the smoking and consumption process. “This smoking and vaping machine-independent solution can be used as a flexible add-on for the emission control of metals of cannabis products,” says Elvers.

    Cerulean also has an electrostatic precipitator trap upgrade kit in its portfolio. The company has been working with Kaycha Labs in Denver, Colorado, USA, to overcome some of the problems inherent in the Colorado state requirement for emissions testing for metals, and it has published several white papers describing some of the changes required to allow a vaping machine to work with highly viscous cannabis oils. “This work supports the multiple machines we have sold to legal operations in the United States and hopefully demonstrates our commitment to this new industry,” says Tindall.  He hopes that a set of practical conditions and analysis standard operating procedures can be adopted by the cannabis industry that provide a basis for comparisons from state to state.

    Agility is Key

     Regarding future requirements for testing equipment and lab services, Sodim and Borgwaldt KC say agility will be key. “Demands change within months, [and] products appear and disappear on the markets in a short period of time, therefore we as a supplier of quality control and emissions testing equipment have to keep up and even overtake these market demands and show our ability to react fastest to new market challenges,” says Camilleri, speaking for both companies.

    “Also, digital solutions within the instruments business are expected to play a bigger role in the future. This can be related to the use of data being generated by measurement equipment or the combination and common usage of such data by the measuring instrument and the manufacturing systems. Even the partial replacement of physical measurements by a digital process is something to be considered as a future requirement.”

    “My personal view is that we have probably hit, or are near to hitting, an innovation ceiling for vaping products,” predicts Tindall. “HTPs are still in a growth phase, and there will be other entrants beyond the big players currently in the market. There will be novel HTPs for sure over the coming five years.”

    Tindall expects quality assessment and quality control for physical tests to transition from the laboratory to the production floor. “This means we need to have robustness and simplicity of operation in the forefront of our equipment design,” he says. “Especially if, as I expect, HTP manufacture is increasingly accompanied by more stringent traceability [requirements] as HTPs become even more highly regulated than combustible cigarettes. This will make current good manufacturing practice a baseline requirement that our equipment would need to support. Moreover, the interconnectedness of manufacturing processes and data retrieval becomes a fundamental of design and not just an afterthought.”

    The recreational cannabis market, he says, will continue to spread. “This will mean that belatedly, there will be regulation of emissions, requiring new vaping equipment.”

    With more than 1 billion adult smokers in the world—a number that is still increasing—Allen expects demand for testing to support regulatory submissions to increase over time, with a demand for more sensitive testing criteria, more in-depth analysis of test data and great insight from real-world evidence based on human factor studies over longer time periods.

    “Remember, this is still a very young industry, so continuing to collect data is going to be essential to underpin belief in reduced-risk products and their contribution to tobacco harm reduction,” he says.

  • The Test of Time

    The Test of Time

    Photo: Vitrocell

    Regulations and next-generation products are driving demand for quality-control instrumentation.

    By George Gay

    It is well known that the arrival of new-generation tobacco and nicotine products has brought with it a need for new testing regimes and instruments. What is perhaps surprising is the smoothness with which these new instruments have fitted into and alongside portfolios of instruments designed with traditional tobacco product manufacture and testing in mind. Ian Tindall, of Cerulean, told me in June that he would struggle to name a product developed by his company during the past few years that did not have its origins or use profile in the new product categories such as vaping devices or heated-tobacco products (HTP). But, he said, this newly developed equipment had added to Cerulean’s range, from which very few pieces of equipment had been “retired.” All the legacy equipment had uses either in the combustible product sector or in the new product sector, and the newly developed equipment often had application in respect of traditional tobacco products. “[W]e have two-way traffic as far as instrumentation is concerned between new and established product use,” Tindall wrote as part of an email exchange.

    Eric Favre

    All of the instrumentation companies TR spoke with in June, either in email exchanges or during telephone calls, cited the development of next-generation products (NGP) or reduced-risk products (RRP) as being, directly or indirectly, the main driver of demand for tobacco and nicotine sector instruments. Eric Favre, of Sodim, said, for instance, that instrument companies were having to develop equipment to measure additional product parameters linked to the complexity of RRP design. At the same time, he added, the need was increasing for the testing of emissions and the analysis of physical parameters in respect of hemp products.

    Meanwhile, Tobias Krebs, of Vitrocell, said that, for his company, one of the main market drivers was the need for various organizations and companies to assess the possible impact on human health of the consumption of tobacco and nicotine products while another driver was the necessity of assessing in vitro data for submission to regulatory authorities.

    Chris Crawley

    While agreeing that the emergence of NGPs had been a driving force for instrumentation sector demand, Chris Crawley, of Axiom Select, made the point that this demand had required a significant investment in new instruments against a background of little growth. Indeed, he said, demand for traditional tobacco product instruments was flat and focused mainly on the replacement market and after-sales service.

    This is not to say the replacement market is not important. Tindall said there was a perennial demand created by the need eventually to replace aging installed equipment and that this need could provide a steady “demand backbone” to an instrumentation business. Another driver, he said, was innovation, which could take different forms. On one hand, there were the sorts of innovations driven by instrument suppliers that might result in improved equipment that was faster, more accurate and easier to use, for instance, but that might otherwise result in solutions that provided for previously unrecognized needs.

    On the other hand, there were the collaborative developments driven by the needs created by customer innovations. “The obvious example here is heat-not-burn products that require novel physical measurements of components and finished sticks, and also different methods of generating and capturing aerosols,” he said. “This has spawned new products and product configurations that are increasingly being deployed in factories ’round the world. Often, this demand is company specific and so generally the world does not see those novel instruments, but sometimes the opportunity exists to share these innovation-led products…”

    Advertisement

    The Role of Regulation

    Ian Benson

    There was less agreement when TR asked what part regulations played in increasing or decreasing the need for instrumentation. Ian Benson, of Consultative Solutions, said he thought that regulation would only increase such demand, especially in relation to NGPs. Whereas this sector was not going to follow exactly the pharmaceutical path, traceability was increasing in importance, which meant more on-line measurements being made wherever tobacco was involved. Companies needed to know the exact nature of what they were making, and they needed to be able to recall what they had made, when, and whether it complied with regulations.

    Krebs implied that by their very existence, regulators created a need because they were looking to obtain data on new products. And Favre said that regulation always played a significant role in the need for instrumentation and that this role would not decrease. The main role, however, remained that played by quality control, emission testing and scientific studies.

    But Crawley said that while it might have been thought that all the tobacco regulations now in place and emerging would have benefited the instrumentation sector, the reality was quite different. For instance, the gathering of traditional tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide data from machine-based routine analytical smoking had actually declined—in some instances, quite significantly. Twenty years ago, some had seen the increased regulatory scrutiny as an opportunity to invest in independent laboratory testing facilities, but that market had still not materialized significantly.

    Tindall managed to agree with both camps in saying that regulations could be seen as being a significant driver and as no driver at all. Much of the regulatory landscape around conventional tobacco use had been directed toward restricting use through such policies as taxation and plain packaging, and nothing in this had driven change in inspection and test equipment or a need for greater capacity. And while regulations that had been around for a while, such as those concerned with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s oversight of tobacco, had driven a requirement for increased testing capacity for emissions, that boom had already happened.

    However, Tindall added, there were specific regulatory requirements in relation to HTPs that were driving a need for high levels of manufacturing controls and post-manufacture product verification, which seemingly could only increase. Where HTPs contained three, four or five nontobacco elements combined, the integrity and consistency of the final product relied on process control. And this had driven innovation in physical testing that was being carried out by, for instance, the X-ray machine and end form analyzer machines Cerulean released last year. The diversity of HTP designs demanded also that such test equipment was specific to each design.

    Looking ahead, Tindall said that potential regulations might well increase the need for instrumentation. The very low nicotine proposals the FDA was considering might impact smoking machines while individual stick marking as proposed in the U.K. and EU single-use plastics legislation could all change the way the industry controlled and measured the products it made.

    Advertisement

    Trends

    Photo: Sodim

    At this point, the question arises as to which tobacco and nicotine sector instruments are currently most in demand. And the answer, of course, largely relates to the specialties of the various instrument suppliers. For Krebs and Vitrocell, the answer was higher throughput exposure systems for the exposure of lung cell cultures and bacteria used in Ames tests because these instruments provided indications about the effects on human health of exposure to various compounds, and information on the relative exposure risks created by combustion and noncombustion products.

    In addition, Krebs said that demand was high for dosimetry tools for assessing the composition of aerosols online, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and time of flight mass spectrometry: tools that were required to assess the influence of compounds on biological systems.

    For Favre, instruments for measuring physical parameters and those for measuring specific parameters related to emission testing were always in demand. And he made the point that since testing emissions from traditional cigarettes had a different set of requirements from those of testing emissions from electronic cigarettes, HTPs or hemp cigarettes, instrumentation had to be adapted as the market moved in these new directions. In addition, he said, upcoming regulation, either at a regional or global level, would intensify the need for new measurement solutions.

    Tindall, meanwhile, said any equipment to do with HTPs was in demand, given that this was where tobacco company investments in new makers and production lines were being made. Physical testing required a whole range of measurements to be made and, usually, existing instrumentation was not suitable. Demand for smoking machines and vaping machines for e-cigarettes and HTPs had probably peaked with the deadline for FDA premarket tobacco product applications, but this demand for smoking and vaping machines remained strong and would probably continue to do so for a while. However, it was demand from multinationals and independent manufacturers for equipment for testing the smoke and physical characteristics of conventional cigarettes that still made up the backbone of Cerulean’s business.

    Photo: Cerulean

    Matching Budgets and Needs

    Of course, measuring processes, products and the potential effects those products have on health are all vitally important, but the question is, are the instruments necessary to carry out such measurements affordable? The responses here were diverse but tended to suggest what I guess is obvious. A big, rich company can afford instrumentation, whereas a smaller, less well-off one might not be able to do so. Crawley said that tobacco quality control and quality assurance instruments comprised a specialist market segment and, as a result, had always been expensive. “For example,” he said, “even manual digital instruments to measure diameter, pressure-drop and/or dilution cost $20,000–30,000 and are often considered unaffordable by the smaller independent producers. A multi-parameter test station can easily cost $100,000.”

    Krebs, too, conceded that it could be expensive for small companies to carry out the sorts of testing for which his company’s instruments were designed. But, he added, the expense was less associated with the investment in such instruments than with that necessary in providing the infrastructure, such as laboratories, personnel and laboratory routines. One way this could be overcome, and often was, was to outsource such work to contract research organizations.

    Favre, meanwhile, implied that such instrumentation was generally affordable, but he came at the question from the point of view that the measurements such instruments provided were an essential part of manufacturing processes rather than add-ons or luxuries. Such instruments, he said, were needed to help control quality during the production process and thereby help to ensure compliance with regulations but also to assist with research and development.

    Tindall generally agreed with this idea, saying it was a truism that it was easy to measure the cost of quality checking, but the cost of poor or inconsistent quality was only measured eventually in lost sales and opportunities. However, he added that Cerulean was aware that different organizations had different objectives and resources when it came to investing in instrumentation and that it was important to have a product portfolio that reflected this—a continuum of equipment to match budgets and needs.

    Tindall also echoed Krebs’ comments in saying that while the entry costs for the analysis of smoking and vaping emissions could be high, the investments necessary were inflated by the infrastructure needed rather than the equipment. And he, too, pointed out that one way around this situation was to take advantage of contract research laboratories.

    Upgrades and Refurbishments

    Given that there are at least some issues to do with affordability, it has to be asked, too, whether there is a viable secondhand market in tobacco and nicotine sector instruments or whether there is a viable refurbishment business. Well, according to Crawley, for the most part the major instrument manufacturers have never entertained a serious interest in the secondhand instrument market. Managements considered the sector not large enough to warrant serious consideration, he said. It saw no commercial advantage in the sector and concluded that it detracted from potential new instrument sales. However, for enterprising individual businesses, this market gap provided a wonderful opportunity—albeit not a large one—to supply quality services and products for about a third of the normal cost.

    I think it need come as no surprise that the sort of instrumentation provided by Vitrocell doesn’t lend itself to the establishment of either secondhand or a refurbishment business. Elsewhere, such businesses do exist, but mainly they provide for internal use. So, Favre said, “secondhand” equipment might be transferred by a supplier from one manufacturing company facility to another while refurbishments were often driven by environmental or sustainability considerations. Refurbishments in the guise of upgrades might be driven by new technical requirements, such as software or controller upgrades, or by new measurement requirements. One particular upgrade might see an instrument designed for use with conventional products converted to one used for HTPs.

    Refurbishments and upgrades, meanwhile, have become a fairly major offering from Cerulean—part of its culture. There was a lot of equipment in service around the world, said Tindall, and factories had made significant investments in this equipment. So, during the past two years, Cerulean had been examining how to extend the life of it by providing a range of upgrades intended to modernize equipment. This was in addition to a long-standing refurbishment service for physical test stacks that had generally been taken advantage of when customers cascaded equipment from one plant to another.

  • Measuring Up

    Measuring Up

    Photo: Broughton Nicotine Services

    How instrumentation suppliers and laboratory service providers are supporting customers with their PMTA submissions

    By Stefanie Rossel

    Although there has been a 120-day extension due to the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, Sept. 9 will definitely be the final day: If a company wants its “recent” tobacco products to remain in the U.S. market, it has to submit a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by then. In 2016, the FDA announced that all tobacco products not on the market prior to Aug. 8, 2016, would require authorization before entering the market and all products on the market prior to that date would have a grace period during which companies could prepare their PMTAs for submission.

    The candidate products will all undergo a several-stage review during which they have to demonstrate with the help of scientific data that they are “appropriate for the protection of public health.” The FDA will consider the risks and benefits of the products not only to the individual but also to the overall population, including whether existence of the product will increase the likelihood of nonusers starting using them. The evaluation also includes reviews of product ingredients, constituents, toxicological profile, health impact, manufacturing and packaging processes as well as labeling.

    Tobacco Reporter asked several instrumentation suppliers and providers of laboratory services how they experienced the run-up to the FDA’s extended deadline, which was originally set for May 12, 2020.

    “The date for the premarket submission was set well in advance, so there was increased demand but no real ‘rush,’” says Tobias Krebs, managing director of German company Vitrocell, which specializes in in-vitro testing technology.

    Ian TIndall

    Ian Tindall, head of innovation and marketing at Cerulean, says there has been a noticeable demand for extra testing capacity in the U.S. but that most of this demand was generated in late 2019, and the extension to the submission date had not really been visible.

    “The larger companies have had this well organized all the way along, and from our experience, the anticipated rush for testing at the contact research organizations has not been mirrored in a late rush for test equipment,” Tindall explains.

    “I should note that the EVALI crisis at the back end of 2019 did generate demand for additional testing of vaping products and a consequent surge in instrument demand, and this did put pressure on the business, but we feel we met all the urgent demands successfully. More recently, some of the focus has moved away from vaping devices towards tobacco-heating products, and we have been increasing supply kits and specialist machines and upgrades for this sector of the industry.”

    In February 2019, Cerulean teamed up with Tews, a leading supplier in the field of industrial microwave moisture and density measurement. Cerulean now exclusively markets Tews laboratory devices for the tobacco industry. Based in Hamburg, Germany, Tews also has a U.S. subsidiary. “We can now jointly address emerging requirements for density and moisture testing in the industry and work effectively with clients in this regard,” says Tindall.  

    Thomas Schmidt

    Thomas Schmidt, director of scientific and technical affairs at Borgwaldt KC, a German manufacturer of high-end quality control instruments and precise measurement devices that is part of the Hauni group of companies, notes that the PMTA process was communicated early and the instruments used to generate the data were available. “Besides new developments like our next generation of analytical vaping machines, the NGX series, we have, however, made some modifications to existing instruments—on our LM5SP and LM5SF, for example, which are both intended to collect aerosol in different collections procedures and increased the flexibility in usage to meet the specific demands of certain customers,” says Schmidt.

    Broughton Nicotine Services (BNS) has noted a definite increase in demand for its services in the runup to the PMTA deadline, according to Chris Allen, vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs. For many companies, he contends, the PMTA has been the first opportunity to truly characterize and stress test their products.

    “This has inevitably led to clients learning more about their products and the need to understand further so that risks can be mitigated and improvements made in the future,” Allen says. “The extension has provided additional time for these companies to perform further characterization and bolster their applications. In addition, we’ve seen a wave of companies who had been delaying the PMTA process or having partial information take advantage of the extension in order to commit to the PMTA pathway.”

    Photo: Borgwaldt KC

    Heavy workload

    Matters are complicated by the FDA’s requirement that applicants file a separate application for each brand variant. For suppliers of instrumentation equipment and labs, this has meant a lot of additional work in recent months. “This has had no impact on our business but has required software development to become FDA compliant,” says Eric Favre, managing director of Sodim, a French company specializing in metrology for the tobacco industry and, like Borgwaldt KC, part of the Hauni group of companies. Sodim has developed a specific device called VPA (vaping puff analyzer). “This device has required adaptations for new formats with specific sample holders,” says Favre.

    “The established manufacturers of traditional tobacco products have lots of data available for marked products, which they can provide to the FDA. In [the] case of modified and new products, especially vaping products, the manufacturers were not all aware of what is expected,” Schmidt points out. “These products are newer to the market and do not have sufficient historical data available to refer to. Therefore, we were not surprised that this has led to an increased demand for our next-generation product (NGP) machines and has driven us to develop a new generation of analytical vaping machines, our NGX family and other innovations and modifications within the available Borgwaldt KC portfolio to meet the needs of the market.”

    Allen says that although each product is unique, the FDA is accepting “bundled” submissions for multiple products, which enables clients to save cost and tell the “story” of a group of products. “Despite the ability to include multiple products under one submission, the level of analytical testing has been significant,” he says. “We had been planning our expansion in line with the PMTA since 2015 and moved into our new dedicated nicotine products facility in 2018.”

    The expansion project was completed in January of 2019 following an investment of £10 million ($12.41 million) into people, facilities, analytical equipment, software development and quality standard certification. The company recruited more than 70 new team members, not only within the analytical function but also across clinical, nonclinical and project management.

    Vitrocell observed increased demand for systems with higher output. “We needed to increase our development activities but could tie in new orders in our regular production scheme,” says Krebs.

    “We are fortunate that in the way we have set up our supply chain and manufacturing facility we can redeploy resources quickly and keep customers satisfied with extending lead times,” Tindall says. “Some special requests have taken a little longer to fulfill than our standard lead time, but by switching capacity, say, from our standard smoking machines to vaping and THP testing machines, we have managed to meet our delivery commitments. That is not to say we have not met bumps in the road, but the unsung heroes in the back office who keep the production machine running have really risen to the challenge.”

    A key part of the PMTA is to understand how your product behaves, what the risks are and therefore what quality control checks need to be in place.

    Far-reaching measurements

    Testing required for PMTA applications is manifold; it includes the analysis of tobacco and e-liquid constituents, ingredients and additives, especially the 33 substances listed by the FDA as harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs), smoke and vapor constituents as well as all physical parameters of the products, toxicological assessments and topographic data, notes Schmidt. “We have seen a remarkable increase in interest in our topography products as well as our NGP vaping devices,” he says.

    In vitro data play a role in the application too. For Vitrocell, this translated into demand for its exposure solutions. Cerulean witnessed greater interest in its vaping machines, particularly with an accessory that determines the density of the vapor. “We have published a lot of work that shows how this device, primarily designed for showing when an e-cigarette stops effectively forming aerosol, can be used to monitor the full life delivery of aerosol of an e-cigarette device,” Tindall explains. “Beyond measurement is the need from our customers’ perspective for installation and servicing in line with good laboratory practice [GLP], with an installation qualification and an operational qualification step that is properly documented.”

    According to Allen, the level of testing required to demonstrate the shelf life of the product, including extractables and leachables, should not be underestimated. “Having the analytical data available is just the start of the process. Conclusions need to be drawn from this data to understand the performance of the product and most importantly to risk assess from a toxicological perspective,” he says. “This is why we saw the creation of the integrated chemistry consultancy and toxicological teams of paramount importance as having these teams on-site enables us to design the analytical studies in line with the end purpose and perform ‘real-time’ risk assessments.” BNS has also developed ToxHQ, a unique internal software tool to complete rapid toxicological screening and risk assessment. The central repository holds chemical data used in e-liquid formulations, including chemical identifiers, properties and classifications, such as HPHC-registered chemicals, Allen says.

    Chris Allen

    Managing the data

    Once the products have been authorized, further measurements will be needed to maintain compliance. “This will be an interesting development over the coming months and as we start to see FDA feedback on the PMTAs,” Allen points out. “It will very much depend upon the product sub-category, e.g., e-liquid, closed system or open device, but the critical point is demonstrating that you have control over the finished product. A key part of the PMTA is to understand how your product behaves, what the risks are and therefore what quality control checks need to be in place as either verification of incoming parts or ingredients, in-process controls or analysis of the manufactured product.”

    As an instrumentation supplier, Tindall says the company must recognize that once equipment has been bought, its use might change subtly over time. “We have a mission to ensure that time does not make our products obsolete. Consequently, as part of our product development strategy, we have upgrade paths plotted for most equipment that allows adaptations as regulatory pressures change or research applications and the new products by research demand. One thing beyond ongoing measurement that should not be minimized is the need to ensure that the equipment used is running properly.”

    In the course of a PMTA as well as during the control period afterward, massive amounts of data are generated, requiring expert management. Borgwaldt KC’s instrumentation features a data collection tool for this purpose. The company offers a variety of methods for collection, storage and submission of data to the customer’s data management system. “Our products are in compliance with the FDA requirements related,” Schmidt says, “but in general, the quantitative analysis of specific substances is requiring other analytical equipment in the labs.”

    Vitrocell offers solutions that enable its systems to be operated with GLP compliance. “Beyond that, data management is performed using the current technology of the customer,” Krebs relates.

    Advertisement

    “There is a lot of data generated, and we have worked with a number of customers to ensure that there is a seamless exchange of data with their laboratory information and management systems (LIMS),” Tindall states. “The vast number of LIMS suppliers has meant that we have had to do this on a case by case basis, and we feel we have been successful in this. We are very conscious of the increasing burden of data generation and storage. Our 21CFRpart11 packages, which are available on many of our products, create complex audit trails. The Internet of Things (IOT) and Industry 4.0 initiatives will increase the amount of data on machine performance that is available to an auditor, user or engineer, and this will be the next challenge to face.”

    Allen says that the retention of records is critical within any regulatory process. As BNS evolved from its pharmaceutical facility Broughton Laboratories, retention of both hard and electronic data has always been an integral part of the company’s quality management system. “Over the past twelve months, we’ve generated in excess of 200,000 lines of HPHC data for our clients, so effective data management is key. The utilization of LabHQ LIMS, developed by our sister company Broughton Software, including integration with the laboratory instrumentation and dynamic reporting, enables us to manage such large datasets.”

    The handful of PMTA approvals to date were granted after long and tedious reviewing processes. Thus far, only three products have received marketing authorization: Swedish Match’s General snus, Philip Morris’ IQOS device and Heatsticks along with two varieties of 22nd Century’s Moonlight cigarettes. What happens when the FDA gets overrun with submissions remains to be seen. Favre expects feedback from the FDA before the end of this year.

    “There will be huge amounts of data for the regulators to review,” Schmidt says. “It will be a monumental task to say the least.”

    “The FDA [is] undoubtedly going to see a significant number of applications,” Allen comments. “The PMTAs we’ve been working on consist of tens of thousands of pages, so this is going to be a large volume of data for [the] FDA to review. The big question will be how many PMTAs make it through to the review stage, which will impact most on [the] FDA’s resource. Once in substantive review, this very much depends on what additional data is requested by [the] FDA as any major amendment of an application, either by the applicant or at the FDA’s request, would result in a new 180-day review period.”

    He concludes: “In the same manner that all regulated industries have had to evolve, the electronic nicotine-delivery systems market will be no different. The PMTA process is simply a starting point, and as the FDA learns more about the products and risks, we’re likely to see further guidance issued—for example, the addition of new analytes and a deeper understanding of other possible chemical reactions and their risks to human health.”

  • Knowing The Ropes

    Knowing The Ropes

    Harnessing decades of experience in process instrumentation, Ian Benson sets out on his own.

    By George Gay

    Photos courtesy of Ian Benson

    Shortly after starting a video call with Ian Benson at the beginning of April, I noticed that behind him, on the wall of his office, was a sign that read: “Gone sailing.” If only, he must have been thinking. You don’t have to speak with Benson for long to realize that he is not a man who takes easily to sitting around, and our call took place about a week into the U.K.’s coronavirus lockdown.

    His frustration, however, concerned not only his inability to access his boat, which, after having been cleaned over winter, had been returned to the water just three weeks earlier, but the fact that the lockdown was making it difficult to make headway in respect of two consultancy projects—one in progress and another recently negotiated—that he was undertaking as part of the company he set up in October last year, Ian Benson Consultative Solutions (IBCS).

    Benson, who has been involved since the 1980s in the design, development and implementation of online and QA/QC process instrumentation for manufacturing industries, such as those producing tobacco, flexible packaging and food, last year went out on his own offering a number of services, including the evaluation and optimization of online process measurements in factories. And it is noteworthy that one of the points he made in a letter sent out on setting up IBCS was that he was internationally mobile—able to visit manufacturing facilities wherever they might be.

    For many years, Benson’s life has revolved around travel, whether on water for relaxation or by air for work. Indeed, he mentioned a number of times during our call that he hugely enjoyed traveling, though what he really meant, I think, is that in the case of work travel, he enjoys arriving wherever he is bound for and, especially, meeting people, interacting with them and building relationships that straddle the workplace and restaurant.

    Interestingly, however, his work life could have been very different from how it panned out. He told me how, in 1978, after having obtained his chemistry degree and PhD (focusing on organometallic catalytic systems and spectroscopy) at Bristol University, U.K., he had “dreams” of harnessing all the “wonderful skills” he had learned, and so started looking for industry-relevant roles to exploit his knowledge. However, he said, it was not to be because such forward-looking opportunities were scarce if not nonexistent. Clearly, at that stage he could easily have slipped into academia had it not been for the fact that the area of research he was engaged in ran out of road. Looked at from today’s perspective, it’s hard to imagine that, at a time when the world was becoming paranoid about running out of oil, there would not have been enough interest in synthesizing organic oil, but that was apparently the case.

    Advertisement

    So, Benson, in his own words, “moved onto reality,” taking a job in the U.K. with the photographic film company, Ilford, where he initially worked as a research scientist but where he gradually moved to a technical services role, which involved product management—designing products for customers. This move, he said, confirmed to him that he didn’t want to pursue an academic career—that he preferred interacting with customers and providing things that companies needed. Benson laughed somewhat guiltily as he added that this was probably the start of his moving to the “dark side”—sales and marketing.

    It was a gradual move. After three years, he left Ilford and, in 1981, joined Infrared Engineering, then a private company of about 30 people, as an applications engineer. In 1992, Infrared was bought by, and became an operating company of, the Fairey Group (later renamed Spectris after Fairey bought Spectris), by which time Benson was working in sales and, shortly after the acquisition, was made a legal director—sales—of Infrared. After taking a number of marketing courses, his role evolved to embrace both sales and marketing; but, eventually, that role became too burdensome as the business grew and, especially, after Infrared acquired NDC Systems, a U.S. company specializing in instrumentation systems for the flexible packaging market, and became NDC Infrared Engineering. At that point, around 1997–1998, he had to choose between sales and marketing, and, having developed an “increasingly passionate” interest in marketing and having worked in sales for more than 10 years, he chose the latter.

    As a newly appointed applications engineer at Infrared in 1981, Benson began working with customers to design measurements they needed to make as part of their processes and that could be made using Infrared’s instruments, such as moisture or nicotine in tobacco. He quickly became the manager of what was then a small department and started to travel the world, relishing his immersion in different cultures. “It was a really interesting role and one that I would recommend to anyone who isn’t certain whether they want to get into the sales and marketing arena, because it is a gentle introduction,” he said.

    “Interesting” hardly describes things adequately. Benson smiled broadly as he recalled many years ago shivering in a suit and tie as he made a sales pitch during an Asian winter to tobacco company representatives rugged up in a cold, unheated venue, and watched them gradually fall asleep. In fact, a lot of the stories he tells have him as the fall guy. Benson told me also that he was very hands-on and liked to get on with things, though at times he should have been more patient. Once in a GLT plant in South America he quickly climbed a ladder, keen to see where gauges were going to be positioned above a conveyor. But where he climbed to was also an exit port for a strip-tobacco drying station, and he was hit by a nicotine rush that almost had him falling down the ladder. Seeing the state he was in, his hosts, hardly able to contain their laughter, told him they would have warned him had he waited five seconds.

    For many years, Ian Benson’s life has revolved around travel, whether on water for relaxation or by air for work.

    But such close engagements with tobacco processing and the people involved in it were key to Benson’s success, and he underpinned his company’s position in established markets and led it into new regions and countries. On one trip in the mid-1980s, he managed to hitch a ride on the private helicopter taking the president of Gudang Garam from Surabaya to the company’s headquarters in Kediri, Indonesia, and later returned home with an order worth £250,000 ($311,174), a huge amount of money for a relatively small company in those days. Importantly, too, Benson was one of the tobacco industry pioneers who broke into the China market as that country opened to the West. China became NDC Infrared’s biggest tobacco-sector market and was still the biggest when he left in August 2019.

    Later, it helped that, with NDC on board, Benson was able to make sales pitches that underlined the huge range of measurements that his company could offer. He told me that he could take a cigarette pack and tell potential customers that NDC Infrared could measure the thickness of the film that the tear-strip was made from, the adhesive with which it was attached and the thickness of the overwrap to which the tear-strip was stuck. Beyond the wrap, the company’s instruments could measure the moisture in the pack’s board and in the metalized film, and the coating applied to the aluminum foil to stop it discoloring. Finally, in the case of the cigarette itself, measurements could be made of the filter paper, the tow and, hugely importantly, the moisture, nicotine and sugar in the tobacco.

    With such a pitch, it was not surprising that NDC Infrared, and Benson in particular, built up close relationships with companies around the world, and he spoke with special fondness of bygone trips to the multiple factories operated by the then Spanish tobacco monopoly, Tabacalera, where he worked closely over long hours checking the performances of his company’s instruments with the monopoly’s engineers and technicians; and where, at lunch and dinner, he joined them again to savor the country’s fine foods and wines.

    Advertisement

    Driving forward

    But I have to be careful here because I shouldn’t give the impression that Benson is somehow stuck in the past, reminiscing about the good old days, because he isn’t. His naturally restless spirit tends to drive him forward, something that is illustrated in his letter to prospective clients where he points out that he can help in respect of old or new processes, existing or evolving technology, and with new and developing needs, even those where a solution has not yet been identified.

    But, having said that, there is one positive aspect of the tobacco instrumentation business that he mentioned as having been lost in more recent times, and it is illustrated above in the anecdote about Spain. In the past, he said, major tobacco manufacturers employed a lot of highly skilled engineers and technicians with whom instrumentation company people could work in situ in testing and improving established devices and developing new ones, but those engineers and technicians had disappeared, victims of cost reductions.

    Of course, Benson well understands the reasons why those cost reductions had to be made. After all, he has spent just about all his working life serving an industry that has been under ever-increasing pressure from anti-tobacco activists and regulators. And this raises an interesting point. Despite all of the consolidation the industry has undergone and despite all of the pressure that has seen smoking decrease sharply in at least Western markets, Benson never mentioned any major downturns having occurred in the demand for tobacco factory instruments, which logically should have been indirectly and negatively affected by these developments. And the reason for this is that there haven’t been any significant downturns. What has been lost on the swings has been gained on the roundabouts.

    As tobacco products have been changed in response to regulations or the need for cost savings, the need for measuring new or modified products and processes in traditional or new ways has increased, so the demand for the instruments that can make those measurements has increased also. Over the years, various “new” products have been added to blends, including stem, waste in the form of reconstituted tobacco and expanded tobacco of different types. And as Benson says, those changing processes have had to be controlled through new or modified measurements that have required a continuous development cycle in so far as instrumentation is concerned.

    And this demand for new measurements and instruments hasn’t been driven only by outside pressure. The increasing speed of cigarette manufacture and increasingly strict industry-set standards have required that whereas primary factories might have used one gauge in the past, now, some of them will be equipped with 40. And then there is the development of heat-not-burn products, the components of which, most of them highly differentiated, have to be measured with the utmost precision.

    There is clearly much still to do—well, once the lockdown is lifted and there’s been just a little time to go sailing.

  • Cerulean Presents X-Ray Measurement Technology

    Cerulean Presents X-Ray Measurement Technology

    Cerulean has introduced into its Quantum Neo physical test station a shelf capable of routinely and rapidly X-ray imaging cigarettes and filters.

    The need arose from the limitations of current inspection methods when testing complex, combined products such as those used for tobacco-heating products. X-ray imaging allows visualization and accurate measurement of the size and position of hidden elements without damaging or destroying the product under test. Compliant with all U.K. radiological protection standards, the fully shielded system is suitable for the factory floor for automated routine product analysis.

    Beyond the obvious R&D application, adding the powerful X-ray tool to the Quantum Neo QA/QC stack enables the producer to speed product release to the market with confidence that the constructional features in his products are fully compliant to specification. The power of the tool can be applied to complex tobacco-heating products and conventional products. Location of flavor capsules radially and longitudinally is simple and not limited by the proximity of other capsules or features, such as carbon filters, a significant limitation of microwave systems.

    The Cerulean system utilizes a low-power X-ray source and a custom detector array. This arrangement (patent pending) produces a full rod image in less than six seconds. A suite of advanced software tools, automatically applied to the brand specification, measures hidden features’ length and size with an accuracy of up to 20 microns. Additionally, tube concentricity, capsule position and integrity as well as voids and defects can be detected and measured. Thick or metalized tipping paper does not present difficulties of measurement for the system.

    The straightforward software tools make this suitable for use by operators and technicians as well as laboratory scientists.

    This novel hardware configuration is both robust and competitively priced when compared with more conventional standalone systems such as CAT scanners.

    Integrating the X-ray shelf (designated “Q” by Cerulean) into the Quantum Neo test station provides a powerful analytical tool when coupled with more conventional measurements, such as PDV, size or weight measurements, with the added benefit of leveraging other Quantum Neo capabilities, such as autosampling from the mass flow or from a GD combiner for the ultimate in QA measurements.

    Orders for Quantum Neo containing the Q shelf can now be taken on standard lead times.

  • Gauging the future

    Gauging the future

    NDC Technologies is energized by the challenge of new tobacco products.

    By George Gay

    As combustible tobacco cigarettes start to make way for less risky products that require new or modified manufacturing materials, it would seem reasonable to assume that some of the traditional suppliers to the tobacco manufacturing industry must be wondering what tomorrow holds for them. But last month, when Tobacco Reporter caught up with the global marketing director of NDC Technologies, Ian Benson, he appeared primed for a demanding but interesting future for his company’s on-line measuring instrumentation. The traditional tobacco industry is still a strong and important part of NDC’s business, he said, and while the consumption of combustible products is declining slightly, it isn’t going to disappear in a hurry. The industry is still innovating, and it has a huge installed base of on-line infrared gauges that will need to be replaced at some time in the future.

    At the same time, the reduced-risk products that are on the market and that are coming onto the market provide further opportunities. The manufacture of some of these products, including heat-not-burn devices, is interesting for NDC, Benson said, because the measurement requirements it generates go beyond the on-line moisture and total-volatiles measurements for which NDC’s instrumentation is best-known within the tobacco industry, and it draws on the capabilities of the group’s other three businesses, such as those to do with the measurement of thickness, mass per unit area, line speed and length. These are capabilities that NDC has in its portfolio and that it could use to help manufacturers that wanted to move in new directions. “I think we’re going to see more demanding and interesting measurement requirements from the industry in the future,” Benson said.

    The fact that the traditional tobacco industry still has considerable mileage in it was illustrated in February when NDC received from China orders for infrared gauges worth about $1 million. This was business won following on-site performance tests against competitive instrumentation, Benson said, and it indicated that NDC was still attracting significant business based on the requirements of the combustible-products manufacturing industry.

    The end of last year saw NDC score a considerable success, too, in another on-site trial, this time at the premises of a major Western tobacco manufacturer that NDC had not supplied previously. On this occasion, its TM710eV total-volatiles, infrared-filter gauge, which was launched at the beginning of last year, was chosen in preference to a diode-array full-spectrum infrared gauge and another filter-based gauge in a direct competitive trial in which the suppliers were not allowed into the factory to tweak their instruments.

    The full gamut

    Ian Benson

    The difference between using a full-spectrum gauge and a filter gauge can be confusing to those not familiar with such technology, in part because both systems examine the full spectrum of infrared radiation at some point in the development process. In the case of the former, the full-spectrum gauge is mounted on-line, and the huge amount of raw data collected is subjected to a complex mathematical data reduction technique that identifies the infrared regions or wavelengths that correspond to the principle variance in respect of, say, total volatiles within the tobacco being measured—those parts of the spectrum that must be “observed” to measure the total volatiles.

    In the case of NDC’s filter gauge, samples of the tobacco to be measured on-line are firstly run through full-spectrum infrared spectrometers in the company’s laboratory to identify the fingerprint of the total volatiles in the spectrum—to identify what are the regions or wavelengths of the infrared spectrum that correspond to changes taking place in the total-volatiles content of the tobacco. That fingerprint will be found in only four to six discrete regions, and those are translated into optical filters that are included in the on-line gauge.

    “We are used to supplying production people who want a solution, so we’ve done that mathematical processing of the full-spectrum information in our laboratory and put the dedicated solution into our analyzer,” said Benson. “We are using the same modeling techniques as the full-spectrum—diode array—people, but we choose to give the customers a solution that is more process-suitable.

    “What I mean by that is that tobacco manufacturers want fast measurements and they want measurements that are not affected by lighting, by ambient humidity and by changes in temperatures in the factory, and using our technology with filters, that can be achieved. NDC has been on-line since day one, which was back in 1970.”

    For Benson, on-line is the key word. The problem with some full-spectrum systems was that they required the manufacturer to have a PC in the factory. “This is not really a practical solution,” he said. “You can go into factories where people have been using our instruments for 10 to 15 years and they still look in great condition; they have handled the environment. But I don’t think you can say that about a PC.”

    NDC developed its TM710eV total-volatiles gauge in cooperation with major tobacco manufacturers, said Benson, and, since its launch, the uptake of it had been strong. Several international players were using it, obtaining good results and seeing the advantage of measuring total volatiles instead of just moisture.

    And it is not only cigarette manufacturers that are taking to the new gauge. A major manufacturer of oral tobacco products has also taken the TM710eV on board. Oral-product tobaccos have higher moisture levels than those of cigarette tobaccos, and the company had previously not been successful in finding an instrument to make the measurements it required. “But we have managed to make very successful measurements,” said Benson. “We have a good reputation for measuring total volatiles in these generally higher-moisture oral products.”

    Again, the language, this time used in respect of moisture and total volatiles, can be confusing. Total volatiles take in anything that dries off in laboratory oven tests, which are performed in a factory to provide highly accurate reference data. The tobacco sample is weighed, heated to 100 degrees Celsius for three or 16 hours, depending on the preferred method, and then weighed again. Whatever has been driven off might be called moisture, but the correct term is total volatiles or oven volatiles. A large part of the total volatiles comprises moisture, but another part comprises humectants, casings, flavors, sugars, etc.

    Well-positioned

    And new-type products introduce other components into the equation. “The thing that has been interesting for us has been the development of heat-not-burn products, which we have been involved in,” said Benson. “We have data that proves we can measure moisture, nicotine, sugars and glycerol, the key components that need to be measured in respect of heat-not-burn tobaccos.”

    And while a heat-not-burn tobacco factory might not require the number of gauges found in sophisticated traditional-cigarette plants, it requires a range of different measurements. “That plays well into NDC’s wide range of capabilities,” said Benson. “For instance, we are heavily into the packaging industry; so we have instrumentation to measure mass per unit area and geometric thickness, or caliper, as we would call it—all on-line. We are able to do a range of different measurements for that application; so if the industry continues to go that way, NDC is well-placed to offer the additional measurements that companies are going to need to control the processes involved.”

    Not all the measurements that NDC can make have tobacco industry applications at present, but they are there if needed in the future. For instance, NDC has been involved in measuring the thickness and coating weight of the active ingredients of transdermal patches used as nicotine-replacement therapies. And, through its cable and tube business, the company can measure the length of materials and the speed at which they are moving if they are being produced in a web-based process. This is a noncontact method called laser Doppler velocimetry.

    Apart from its tobacco, food and bulk business, and its cable and tube business, NDC has, as is mentioned above, a business serving the packaging industry in the fields of extrusion and converting processes and a business serving the metals industry measuring the thickness and flatness of steel or aluminum coils and strips.

     

  • Tews creates U.S. subsidiary

    Tews creates U.S. subsidiary

    Tews Elektronik has established a U.S. subsidiary, Tews of America, to serve its growing client base in that market.

    Based in Durham, North Carolina, the facility will support customers quickly and on a short-term basis.

    Mark Moir, technical sales manager of Tews of America, will develop new markets and establish new customer relationships.

    Tews Elektronik is a leading producer of moisture and density measurement equipment and instrumentation using its patented low-powered microwave technology.

    The company has been developing and manufacturing moisture measurement systems in Hamburg, Germany, for more than 30 years.

    Tews has more than 50 employees working in research, development and production. Its instruments are used in many different areas including the food, chemical, tobacco, pharmaceutical and wood industries and can be found in all corners of the world.

     

     

  • ISO accreditation for Borgwaldt KC

    Borgwaldt KC’s Physical Laboratory has been accredited DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for calibration in the field of fluid quantities/gas flow rates.

    The accreditation comprises in detail the following calibrations:

    • Calibration of pressure drop transfer standards
    • Calibration of air permeability standards
    • Calibration of laminar flow element (LFE) as per ISO 7210 paragraph 4.3.3
    • Calibration of pressure resistors (bubble-adapter) as per ISO 4387 paragraph 7.6.3.4

    The laboratory carries out all calibrations on precise measurement equipment designed specifically for this purpose.