Tag: Russia

  • Estonia Bans Tobacco Imports from Russia

    Estonia Bans Tobacco Imports from Russia

    Photo: rarrarorro

    Estonia banned imports of cigars, cigarillos and cigarettes from Russia on Jan. 9 in compliance with EU sanctions relating to the war in Ukraine, reports Interfax.

    “On 9 January, the transitional period for sanctions imposed by the European Union on a number of consumer goods originating in the Russian Federation will end, and their import into the European Union will be prohibited from Monday,” the Estonian Tax and Customs Board said in a statement.

    “As from 9 January, the transitional period will also end for those sanctioned goods for which supply contracts were concluded before 7 October.”

    The import ban covers a broad selection of consumer goods, including cosmetics, washing and cleaning products, clothes and footwear.

    The prohibited items must be abandoned by the traveler on the border or risk confiscation, the board said.

  • Russia Developing New Excise Technology

    Russia Developing New Excise Technology

    Photo: lite

    Russian authorities are developing technology for digital excise tax on tobacco, reports Interfax, citing comments made by State Secretary and Deputy Finance Minister Alexei Sazanov during a meeting with foreign businesses at the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia.

    “It is assumed that the tax service will automatically calculate tax liabilities when products are released into circulation as based on data that is in the information systems for labeling tobacco and beer,” said Sazanov. “This should further reduce the number of disputes between taxpayers and the tax service.”

    Further digitalizing and transferring tax calculation functions to the tax authorities are part of a drive to simplify administration, according to Sazanov. “This has already been implemented for the majority of property taxes,” he added.

  • Shares Sold in Imperial’s Former Russia Unit

    Shares Sold in Imperial’s Former Russia Unit

    Photo: Imperial Brands

    Russian businessman Sergei Katsiev has acquired a 15 percent stake in International Tobacco Group, the former Russian subsidiary of Imperial Brands, reports Interfax, citing data from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities (USRLE).

    In March, Imperial Brands announced that it was suspending operations in Russia, including production at its factory in Volgograd, sales and marketing, in response to Russia’s military assault on Ukraine. In April, the company said it had transferred its business in Russia to local investors.

    Earlier this year, Imperial Tobacco Sales and Marketing and Imperial Tobacco Volga were renamed International Tobacco Group and International Tobacco Group Volga, respectively.

    According to the USRLE, Nikolai Tyaka owns 75 percent of International Tobacco Group and International Tobacco Group Volga.

    Following the Feb. 24 invasion, international cigarette manufacturers announced they would end their operations in Russia, but retreating from such a major market is easier said than done. Tobacco companies have had to carefully navigate shifting regulations and avoid missteps that could prompt the government to seize the business, for example—all the while trying to protect employees from becoming targets for arrest.

    Tax payments by the leading international cigarette manufacturers have provided the Russian government with at least $7.25 billion in additional income since President Vladimir Putin ordered his army to attack Ukraine, according to an analysis of Russian Treasury figures conducted by The Telegraph.

    Because Russia and Ukraine were relatively small markets for Imperial Brands, representing around 2 percent of net revenues and 0.5 percent of adjusted operating profit in 2021, the company may have found it easier to extract itself from Russia than some of its larger competitors.

  • Smoking Prevalence Halved Since 2009

    Smoking Prevalence Halved Since 2009

    Photo: Comugnero Silvana

    The smoking prevalence in Russia nearly halved between 2009 and 2021, reports Interfax, citing Health Minister Mikhail Murashko.

    “Tobacco consumption among adults went down from 39.5 percent in 2009 to 20 percent in 2021,” Murashko told participants in a recent public health forum.

    The news comes as multinationals are retreating from the Russian cigarette market in response to Moscow’s military assault on Ukraine.

    Following the Feb. 24 invasion, international cigarette manufacturers announced they would end their operations in Russia, but retreating from such a major market is easier said than done. Tobacco companies have had to carefully navigate shifting regulations and avoid missteps that could prompt the government to seize the business, for example—all the while trying to protect employees from becoming targets for arrest.

    Earlier this year, Philip Morris International CEO Jacek Olczak described the process as “bloody complex.” In a July interview, he said the company was unlikely to be able to leave Russia before the end of 2022.

    An analysis of Russian Treasury figures conducted by The Telegraph revealed that the leading international cigarette manufacturers have provided the Russian government with at least $7.25 billion in additional income through tax payments since Feb. 24.

    Russia is the world’s fourth-largest cigarette market. Prior to the war, Japan Tobacco International led the market with a 36.7 percent share, followed by PMI (31.7 percent) and BAT (23.5 percent), according to Cowen & Co.

  • Russia Continues to Collect Significant Tobacco Taxes

    Russia Continues to Collect Significant Tobacco Taxes

    Photo: RODWORKS

    Tax payments by the leading international cigarette manufacturers have provided the Russian government with at least $7.25 billion in additional income since President Vladimir Putin ordered his army to attack Ukraine, according to an analysis of Russian Treasury figures conducted by The Telegraph.

    Center-Life, an anti-smoking lobbying group in Ukraine, told The Telegraph that 2020 taxes from PMI and JTI alone would fund 700 Mil Mi-24 helicopters, 1,970 T-72 tanks and 382 Sukhoi Su-25 fighter jets for the Russian army.

    “It’s clearly completely wrong that these western firms continue to pay significant taxes into Russian coffers because so much of Russian state expenditure now is to fund the war in Ukraine, which is killing people in large numbers,” Bob Seely, a Member of Parliament on the Foreign Affairs Committee, was quoted as saying by The Telegraph.

    Following the Feb. 24 invasion, international cigarette manufacturers announced they would end their operations in Russia, but retreating from such a major market is easier said than done. Tobacco companies have had to carefully navigate shifting regulations and avoid missteps that could prompt the government to seize the business, for example—all the while trying to protect employees from becoming targets for arrest.

    Earlier this year, Philip Morris International CEO Jacek Olczak described the process as “bloody complex.” In a July interview, he said the company was unlikely to be able to leave Russia before the end of 2022.

    Russia is the world’s fourth-largest cigarette market. Prior to the war, Japan Tobacco International led the market with a 36.7 percent share, followed by PMI (31.7 percent) and BAT (23.5 percent), according to Cowen & Co.

  • Ukraine is Opportunity to Transform Tobacco

    Ukraine is Opportunity to Transform Tobacco

    Photo: Hugo

    The crisis in Ukraine offers an opportunity to transform tobacco use across eastern and central Europe.

    By Derek Yach

    Vladimir Vorotnikov, writing in Tobacco Reporter’s August 2022 issue, outlined how Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has upended well-established supply chain and business relationships that have been in effect for decades. In fact, a careful read of Balkan Smoke by Mary C. Neuberger traces the roots of these relationships way back to Bulgaria in the 1920s. Vorotnikov discussed the impact of sanctions on Russian tobacco production, the emergence of illicit trade in the region, and more recently, the reestablishment of cigarette production in Ukraine.

    He does not discuss the massive growth over the past few years in new reduced-risk nicotine products—led by IQOS—across eastern and central Europe. The editor makes the point that Russia is (was) one the largest markets for IQOS. My own observations during a visit to Kyiv in late October 2021 were that a range of vape products and heated-tobacco products were readily available across the city despite posters funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies near the Parliament proclaiming that they were dangerous.

    An anti-vaping poster in Kyiv
    (Photo courtesy of Derek Yach)

    This is a time of profound transition for the region. Amid the horrors of war and the human tragedies it continues to bring to the people of Ukraine are opportunities to reduce future deaths from the single largest cause of premature death in the region—and especially among men—combustible tobacco products. As rebuilding begins—as it inevitably will—government, business and health professionals need to grasp the chance to avoid rebuilding the tobacco industry in the image of the past and rather take the high ground of health and make reduced-risk products the easily available option while phasing out combustible sales.

    For governments, this means adopting risk-proportionate regulations that build on the approaches proposed by the recent Javed Khan report for the United Kingdom, and on the authorizations of a range of reduced-risk products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Ukraine and the neighboring countries relied on FDA guidance in relation to Covid vaccine advice—now is the time to draw upon their guidance to accelerate access to reduced-risk products, citing the FDA’s comments that they are deemed “appropriate for the protection of public health.”

    Tax and other regulatory approaches could be applied to accelerate the transition. Further, governments of the region need to step up investments in customs and excise oversight to stop large-scale illicit trade taking hold—as it has in the occupied territories of Georgia following Russian invasion in 2008.

    The Russian government also has an obligation to protect the health of its people and take regulatory steps to ensure that the progress made by Philip Morris International, Japan Tobacco International and BAT is increasing their revenue from heated-tobacco products at the cost of combustibles. Slippage with regard to these gains will translate into a return to the very high smoking rates, and associated death rates, of the past.

    Government actions will be limited, though, unless the three leading tobacco companies (PMI, JTI and BAT) active in the region commit to take concerted efforts to accelerate their transition out of combustibles and publicly clarify what “withdrawing from Russia” means. Are they continuing to profit from Russian cigarette sales albeit through local companies? Are those companies obliged to push ahead with reduced-risk products, or will they revert to cigarettes?

    Outside of Russia, leading tobacco companies could communicate the benefits of switching, take measures to clamp down on illicit trade and tighten youth access to all nicotine products, through joint action. Such bold actions would give them a chance to show their seriousness to transformation—something investors should reward.

    United Nations agencies have a role to play at this time. Evidence emerging from inside Ukraine suggests that smoking rates have increased among those in the military and possibly among displaced peoples. This is understandable given the unprecedented stress to which people are exposed. The current U.N. response has been to ignore this reality and simply continue to support policies that ban cigarette sales during conflicts—something that is probably ignored. A far better way forward is to support people who smoke or seek nicotine to have ready access to nicotine-replacement products and approved reduced-risk nicotine products. This would mean that a generation of people may well emerge from the war with lower overall risks to their health.

    War and tobacco use are intimately linked and currently interacting in dangerous ways to the health of populations. We should not wait for the transition to peace and health to begin before taking steps to accelerate the transition of smokers away from combustibles.

  • In The Crossfire

    In The Crossfire

    Photo: Tabakprom

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has wreaked havoc on the regional tobacco market.

    By Vladislav Vorotnikov

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has wreaked havoc on the tobacco industry in the post-Soviet area, prompting the world’s largest cigarette companies to shut down Ukrainian factories and curtail investments and marketing activity in Russia. The current crisis is also likely to provoke a dramatic rise in the illegal segment of the tobacco market in this part of the world.

    Since the beginning of the conflict, BAT, Japan Tobacco International and Philip Morris International faced mounting public pressure to sever their ties with Russia.

    On March 23, Ukrainian Finance Minister Serhiy Marchenko appealed to Western tobacco companies to stop doing business in Russia. Marchenko wrote in a statement posted on his Facebook page that all cigarette manufacturers had pledged to suspend new investments, while BAT considered transferring business to a third party. However, he added, those steps were clearly not enough.

    “My conviction is that there can be no compromises and smoothing alternatives,” Marchenko wrote.

    Since Feb. 24, more than 1,000 multinational businesses have said they’re curtailing, suspending or severing ties to Russia compared to only the few hundred that abandoned South Africa over Apartheid,  research conducted by the Yale School of Management showed. The Russian government responded to the mass exodus of Western brands by threatening foreign firms leaving the country with forced nationalization of their production assets.

    On May 16, Russia went through with its threats and nationalized a major factory that belonged to French car maker Renault, sending a clear signal to all Western companies that curtailing operations in the current conditions would come at a heavy cost since it would mean losing their production capacities.

    The Russian authorities are keen to avoid a shortage of cigarettes on the domestic market as it would spark social unrest, something the country had already seen during the final days of the Soviet Union.

    “In 1990, a shortage of cigarettes led to massive strikes and even to plant and factory shutdowns,” said Ekaterina Pozdeeva, an analyst of the Moscow-based think tank Finam. “In Moscow, more than 100 cases of riots over tobacco were registered. The workers demanded at least two packs per hand. The USSR was forced to buy $300 million worth of cigarettes from the USA.”

    On the other hand, over the past 25 years, Western tobacco companies invested roughly $5 billion in the Russian tobacco industry, Pozdeeva said. Losing this money would be quite painful, so most companies opted for transferring their businesses to local market players.

    For instance, BAT has transferred business management to its Russian distributor and partner, SNS Group, which plans to maintain the same level of production and supplies. Philip Morris International also said it considered options for restructuring and transferring assets but has not yet made any concrete decisions.

    Imperial Brands said in a statement on April 21 that it had transferred its business in Russia, including its Volgograd factory, to local investors and would write off €225 million ($294 million) of its tobacco assets in the country. Japan Tobacco International also suggested that it would change the Russian owner of its local business.

    With annual sales ranging between 200 million and 230 million cigarettes, Russia is among the world’s largest tobacco markets. In 2020, the value of the Russian cigarette market was estimated at RUR1.4 trillion ($23 billion), bringing RUR600 billion of taxes to the federal budget, the Russian federal statistical service Rosstat estimated.

    Biting Sanctions

    The Russian cigarette industry, however, is likely to feel the sting of sanctions as all tobacco and almost all raw materials are imported to the country, according to Maxim Korolev, head of the Russian Tobacco informational agency, adding that it is not clear whether import replacement in this field is even possible.

    “On the one hand, paper-based aluminium foil supplied by a Russian company, after several years of quality improvement, has become widely used by many Russian tobacco factories,” Korolev said. “On the other, the domestically produced polypropylene film has not reached the required quality level in terms of some key parameters, and none of the tobacco companies uses it.

    “Factories also use domestic corrugated cardboard for master cases, but we do not make coated cardboard for the cigarette packs,” he said, adding that fast import replacement is not anticipated in this field.

    On top of that, Russia experiences problems with leaf tobacco imports. Over the past few months, Russian businesses complained about a lack of tobacco for homemade cigarettes.

    Igor Moiseev, chairman of the Pogar Cigarette and Cigar Factory, commented that the supply disruptions are primarily attributed to logistics issues. Moiseev said that before the Russia-Ukraine crisis, Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands were the main suppliers of tobacco for homemade products, and most tobacco was delivered by road through Belarus.

    “Today, even with an advance payment, no one can guarantee that the cargo will be delivered [from Europe to Russia],” Moiseev said. “Difficulties in making wire transfers also affect import. And the majority of suppliers operating in this segment of the tobacco market are small[-sized] and medium-sized companies with limited resources.”

    Korolev said that Imperial Tobacco was forced to stop the operation of its factory in Russia due to a lack of tobacco, estimating that other market players may have stocks of tobacco large enough to maintain operation for up to six months. On the other hand, Korolev added, most tobacco for cigarette production is imported into Russia from South American and African countries that have not publicly supported Western sanctions against the country, so there are good chances that the supply disruptions could eventually be sorted out.

    Oleg Barvin, a spokesperson for BAT, confirmed to the Russian newspaper Kommersant that all market participants experienced logistics problems with delivering tobacco and other raw materials for cigarette production to Russia. Barvin added that despite these challenges, the company ensured uninterrupted production and distribution of products.

    On the other hand, the sanctions are not expected to impact the Russian e-cigarette market. As explained by Kirill Plokhikh, director of the business faculty at Synergy University, Russia imports most e-cigarettes from China. Plokhikh added that some share of nicotine-containing liquids for vapes was supplied to Russia from Western countries, but in this segment, too, buyers could swiftly shift to Chinese suppliers.

    Tobacco Industry Bounces Back in Ukraine

    The Russian invasion forced all Ukrainian cigarette makers to pull the plug on operations, but several have already relaunched production, with some even eyeing restoring production performance to the pre-war level.

    Galina Vorobieva, director of Imperial Tobacco Production Ukraine, said that despite fears voiced by Western officials since October 2021 about the upcoming Russian invasion, nobody in Ukraine took it seriously.

    “Although we assumed such a course of events, we did not believe until the very end that it [the Russian invasion] could happen,” said Vorobieva. “We had a plan on how to act in the event of a real threat to the enterprise and personnel. And it is very good that we had it. In the early morning [of Feb. 24], we turned off the equipment, asked people to hop on buses and took them home.”

    Imperial Tobacco considered moving its Ukrainian factory to Western parts of Ukraine even though it would take at least six months to relocate equipment.

    “When we realized that the situation had become more or less controllable, we decided to resume production. It was not an easy decision because we understand that there are still risks,” Vorobieva said, estimating that the factory was out of service for 46 days.

    With much of Ukraine’s tobacco production offline, demand is met primarily by imports from the European Union, according to the Ukrainian tobacco association Ukrtabak.

    Illegal Market Flourishes

    The current crisis promises to dramatically boost the size of the illegal cigarette market in the region. A quarter of Russians have already switched to illegal cigarettes, a survey conducted by the analytical agency Ipsos in April showed. In early April, nearly 25 percent of respondents admitted buying illegal tobacco products, 8 percent more than in mid-March.

    Not only consumers and retailers suffer from illegal products. From 2016 to mid-2021, the federal budget “lost” almost RUR300 billion in tax revenues due to illegal tobacco products, the Russian Accounts Chamber calculated.

    The Moscow-based think tank Kantar TNS Russia estimated that the share of the illegal sector grew tenfold, from 1.1 percent to 10.7 percent, recently. In 2021, the share of illegal tobacco products on the market reached at least 11.5 percent, according to a study by the government’s National Scientific Competence Center.

    The main supplier of illegal tobacco products to Russia is Belarus. Before the adoption of the first Russian anti-tobacco law, Belarus produced 15 billion cigarettes a year with a population of 10 million. Today, the population remains about the same, but cigarette production has grown to 35 billion sticks.

  • Russia Exit Hits BAT Profits

    Russia Exit Hits BAT Profits

    Photo: BAT

    BAT took a £957 million ($1.15 billion) impairment charge related to the transfer of its Russian business, lowering its half-year earnings by a quarter.

    The London-based firm, which controlled almost a fourth of the Russian market, said earlier this year that it was in advanced talks with its distributor in the country to sell the business in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    BAT reported a 25 percent drop in profit from operations on a reported basis to £3.68 billion for the six months to June 30 as a result of the charge. The company expects global tobacco industry volume to be down about 3 percent, partly because of the Russia-Ukraine crisis.

     

    In a press release announcing the half-year results, BAT emphasized the growth of its New Categories products and the performance of its combustible business, which continues to grow value share enabled by robust pricing.

    “I am very proud that our continued New Categories growth momentum is driving faster transformation, with revenue growth of 45 percent in the first half of 2022, on top of 51 percent growth in fiscal year 2021,” said BAT CEO Jack Bowles. “I am especially proud that the number of consumers using our noncombustible brands has passed the milestone of 20 million in the first half.”

    Noncombustible products now represent 14.6 percent of BAT’s revenue.

    While acknowledging the geopolitical and macroeconomic challenges, Bowles was upbeat about the outlook for BAT.

    “We are not immune, of course, to the increasing macroeconomic pressures, exacerbated by the conflict in Ukraine,” he said. “However, we are well positioned to navigate the current turbulent environment due to our powerful brands, operational agility and continued strong cash generation.”

  • ‘Bloody Complex’: PMI’s Tricky Exit From Russia

    ‘Bloody Complex’: PMI’s Tricky Exit From Russia

    Photo: Anton Gvozdikov

    Exiting Russia represents a considerable headache for Philip Morris International, according to an article in The Wall Street Journal. The process, begun in March shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, includes navigating Moscow’s shifting regulations, avoiding missteps that could prompt the government to seize the business and trying to protect employees from becoming targets for arrest.

    Russia’s February invasion triggered Western sanctions, and hundreds of businesses, including tobacco companies, have pledged to exit or cut back operations in Russia. In early March, PMI announced it would suspend its investment and scale down its manufacturing operations in Russia. Later that month, the company announced it would exit the market altogether.

    PMI is trying to sell its Russian business and has had talks with suppliers interested in buying it. However, from the outset, it hasn’t been clear which Russian authority would approve such a sale or what the process was for seeking that approval. “It’s so bloody complex,” The Wall Street Journal quoted PMI CEO Jacek Olczak as saying. “This one is really mind-blowing.”

    Russia is a significant market for PMI. In 2021, it accounted for almost 10 percent of PMI’s global volume of cigarette and heated-tobacco shipments and around 6 percent of its $31.4 billion in net revenue. At the beginning of this year, PMI had more than 3,200 employees in the country.

    The company entered the Soviet Union in 1977, when it signed a licensing agreement with the state-owned industry to manufacture Marlboros. It now has a factory in St. Petersburg and sales offices in about 100 cities.

    Because of the withdrawal, the company will meet a global sales goal for its smoke-free products a year later than expected, Emmanuel Babeau, the company’s chief financial officer, said at a conference in May.

  • Fortuna Possible New Owner Imperial’s Russian Business

    Fortuna Possible New Owner Imperial’s Russian Business

    Photo: ASDF

    Fortuna Cigar House (FCH) could become the new owner of Imperial Brands’ Russian business, according to an Interfax report citing the Kommersant newspaper.

    Following Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine, several tobacco companies said they would scale back their operations in Russia. On April 20, Imperial Brands announced the transfer of its Russian business to local investors, subject to finalization of the registration of the transaction with local authorities. The company estimates a noncash write-off of around £225 million ($279.86) for this transaction.

    Founded in Odessa in 1999, FCH has been operating in Russia since 2011 as a joint venture with the distributor Megapolis, which was previously associated with Russian tobacco mogul Igor Kesaev. The company sells cigars, tobacco, smoking accessories and materials and equipment. It also has its own retail outlet.

    According to SPARK-Interfax, 50.01 percent of FCH belongs to Megapolis, and 49.99 percent belongs to BVG Cigar House Fortuna of Cyprus. In 2021, FCH posted revenue of RUR4.09 billion ($67.12 million) and a net profit of RUR404 million.

    In March, Imperial Brands said it was suspending operations in Russia, including production at its factory in Volgograd, as well as sales and marketing. The company then began talks with a Russian legal entity on transferring the business.

    Imperial Brands operates in Russia through Imperial Tobacco Volga, the production entity, and Imperial Tobacco Sales and Marketing. The company has held around 5.5 percent of the Russian tobacco market, according to business analysts cited by Kommersant.

    Tobacco analysts Maxim Korolyov told Kommersant that Imperial Brands’ products will likely continue to be produced in Russia under a temporary license.