Tag: tobacco

  • Australian State Mandating Tobacco Licenses

    Australian State Mandating Tobacco Licenses

    New South Wales, Australia, is implementing a new mandatory tobacco licensing scheme starting July 1, requiring all retailers and wholesalers selling tobacco and non-tobacco smoking products to hold a valid annual license. The annual license will cost A$1,100 ($726), with applications opening July 1. Businesses must apply by October 1 to continue trading while their applications are assessed.

    After October 2, only approved license holders can legally sell smoking products. Penalties for non-compliance include fines of up to A$11,000 ($7,260) for individuals and A$220,000 ($145,200) for corporations.

    Click here for information about the application.

  • Trucking Company Sued for Overcharging Smokers

    Trucking Company Sued for Overcharging Smokers

    An ex-employee of Marten Transport Ltd. is suing the trucking company in Wisconsin federal court, alleging that a tobacco surcharge in its health plan violates federal antidiscrimination law by charging workers who smoke an extra $780 per year for their health-care coverage than those who don’t, without offering a legally compliant way to avoid the penalty.

    In the complaint, plaintiff Mark Maurer said going forward, workers can avoid these penalties by participating in quit-smoking programs, but there’s no way for them to be reimbursed for fees they’ve already paid. This runs afoul of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which allows health plans to charge higher rates to tobacco-using employees only if they provide a “reasonable alternative standard” that allows workers to have the full penalty waived without quitting smoking, the complaint said.

    According to Hylant Law, numerous class-action lawsuits have recently been filed against employers alleging that health plan premium surcharges related to tobacco use violate federal compliance requirements. These lawsuits have been filed by current and former employees of major U.S. companies, such as PepsiCo, Walmart, Target and Whole Foods, who have paid more in premiums due to their tobacco use, often hundreds of dollars more per employee per year.

    A handful of employers have agreed to class-wide settlements over similar cases, including Bass Pro Group LLC for $5 million, Lippert Components Inc. for $310,000, and UGN Inc. for $299,000.

  • Top U.S. Tobacco Producer Bracing for Tariff Impact

    Top U.S. Tobacco Producer Bracing for Tariff Impact

    North Carolina, the United States’ leader in tobacco production, could face economic fallout from the Trump administration’s recent tariff increases, which have set off a spiraling trade war, Katherine Zehnder wrote for The Carolina Journal. North Carolina exported $533 million in tobacco last year, producing 260.1 million pounds annually, accounting for 60% of U.S. tobacco production.

    “I know tobacco growers are busy planting their crops now to honor the 2025 contracts they have in place with China,” Steve Troxler, commissioner of the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services said. “In the meantime, we continue to monitor these trade negotiations very closely, waiting to see what the outcome will be because it is a very fluid situation. Going back to the last trade negotiations that were initiated, the president was very good about helping farmers who had adverse effects. In fact, he was the first president in a very long time who included tobacco.”

    North Carolina has 822 tobacco farms, generating a revenue of $557 million and adding $197 million to the state’s GDP, according to Regulatory Smoke: The Economic Impacts of Proposed FDA Tobacco Regulations, a report from the John Locke Foundation. Tobacco manufacturers in the state generate $36 billion in output and contribute $31 billion to the state’s GDP, employing approximately 5,000 workers and paying them $370 million in wages. The tobacco wholesale sector brings in $15.3 billion in revenue, adds $9 billion to the GDP, and supports around 4,500 jobs.

    “Historically, tobacco exports have been a vital part of North Carolina’s agricultural strength, with countries like China, Japan, and the European Union serving as major buyers of our tobacco,” said Kelly Lester, policy analyst for the Center for Food, Power and Life at the John Locke Foundation. “When tariffs were imposed during the last trade war, China dramatically reduced its tobacco imports from the US, dealing a blow to farmers here at home. A repeat of that scenario could once again destabilize the market, lower prices, and put immense financial pressure on growers who are already navigating inflation, labor shortages, and tightening regulations.”

    The imposed tariffs could result in a significant downturn in these numbers. International markets, such as China, could also see a substantial downturn in exports due to increased tariffs, which would have a trickle-down effect on the state’s economy and agriculture sector. Last month, China announced plans to impose a 10% tariff on North Carolina exports, which include fruits and vegetables. In addition, China’s tariff on US goods was recently increased from 34% to 84%. 

    “It was pretty predictable that China was going to have a big impact, and they have, and they’re going to attack tobacco pretty hard because they know that that’s part of the soft underbelly in the agriculture sector,” State Rep. Jimmy Dixon, said. “I do not expect it to be permanent; I think that China will come to the negotiating table sooner rather than later, but the temporary reaction will be very tough and difficult and probably be a little bit depressing to our tobacco farmers. I’m telling people I’m personal friends with to hang on; it’s going to be a bumpy ride, but a short bumpy ride.”

  • USN&WR Runs Down Last Week’s Federal Cuts

    USN&WR Runs Down Last Week’s Federal Cuts

    Today, U.S. News and World Report is running down the major anti-smoking efforts that have been shut down or paused by the U.S. government, most notably the CDC’s popular “Tips From Former Smokers” ad campaign. The program, which began in 2012, features real people who suffered health damage from smoking.

    “We estimate the Tips campaign generated nearly 2.1 million additional calls to 1-800-QUIT-NOW during 2012-2023,” researchers wrote. The CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health, which led work on smoking cessation and research into youth tobacco use, was also cut. Now, with the CDC’s tobacco office staff cut, the campaign may go off the air, a former employee said.

    Former CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden, now president of the global health organization Resolve to Save Lives, called the decision a “gift to Big Tobacco.” He told NBC News that, “the only winner here is the tobacco industry and cancer cells.”

    Last week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) made major cuts to tobacco control offices at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dozens of workers were let go, including Brian King, the FDA’s top tobacco regulator.

    In 2023, the CDC gave more than $84 million to state health departments to run quitlines and help smokers quit. Thirteen states may lose at least 30% of their funding, and five states — Connecticut, New Jersey, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia — rely on the CDC for at least 75% of their quitline support, NBC News said.

    Other losses include research projects on tobacco use and the National Youth Tobacco Survey, which tracks smoking and vaping trends among teens. This survey first identified a spike in youth vaping in 2018.

    Kevin Caron, another fired CDC employee, helped trace the deadly 2019 vaping outbreak to vitamin E acetate in fake THC vapes. He said at least five major research projects may end “unless people just independently decide in their free time that they’re going to try to work on them.”

    Despite the cuts, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said tobacco efforts would continue and that the move was part of a larger plan to “streamline operations, enhance responsiveness to the American people, and ultimately improve the nation’s health as part of the Make America Healthy Again initiative.”

  • Study: Airborne Ultrasound Damages Tobacco  

    Study: Airborne Ultrasound Damages Tobacco  

    Ultrasound is a powerful tool with diverse applications in medical diagnostics (diagnostic sonography), therapeutics (treatment of soft tissue ailments), industry (cleaning, welding, cutting, shaping, separating, mixing, etc.), and agriculture. Airborne power ultrasound is a green technology with significant potential for food and environmental applications. For example, the exposure of soybean seeds to the airborne ultrasound increased water uptake without altering the morphology and the wettability of the seed coat; the implication of ultrasound increased the yield rate constant for the ultrasound extraction of saponins from alfalfa leaves almost two times more than that of routine heat-reflux methods; and ultrasound has been widely used to reduce the energy consumption and drying time of herbs.

    A recent study by the Department of Plant Biology at Tarbiat Modares University in Iran was conducted to elucidate the physiological responses of plant cells to airborne ultrasound in tobacco plants. Homogeneous suspension-cultured tobacco cells were subjected to airborne ultrasound at 24 kHz in two pulsatile and continuous modes for 10 and 20 seconds. The study’s outcome revealed that airborne ultrasound triggered the production of H2O2, elevated internal calcium concentration, and reduced antioxidant capacity upon cavitation. Alteration of covalently bound peroxidase and other wall-modifying enzyme activities was accompanied by reduced cellulose, pectin, and hemicellulose B but increased lignin and hemicellulose A. The biomass and viability of tobacco cells were also significantly decreased by airborne ultrasound, which ultimately resulted in programmed cell death and secondary necrosis. The results highlight the potential risks of even short-time exposure to the airborne ultrasound on plant physiology and cell wall chemical composition raising significant concerns about its implications.

    In conclusion, even short exposures to ultrasound can be damaging to tobacco plants, meaning growers should evaluate sound pollution effects on the plant’s living status. Various machines act as sources of airborne ultrasound, including high-frequency cutting tools, ultrasonic cleaners, welding equipment, and some laboratory and medical instruments such as fans, compressors, air handling units, transformers, high-voltage power lines, and electrical discharge machining.