Tag: vaccine

  • Joining the Race

    Joining the Race

    Suthira Taychakhoonavudh (left) and Waranyoo Phoolcharoen

    Thailand is developing its own tobacco plant-based coronavirus vaccine.

    By Stefanie Rossel

    It’s been almost a year now since Covid-19 broke out, and the pandemic still rages around the world. The spread of the virus has set off a global race for a vaccine—consensus among experts is that only an effective inoculation will end the contagion. As of Sept. 28, 40 candidate vaccines were in clinical evaluation and 151 were in the preclinical trial phase, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

    However, speed isn’t everything. Russia, which on Aug. 11 became the first country to approve a Covid-19 vaccine, soon faced criticism by researchers who highlighted questionable data in the vaccine trial results. AstraZeneca and Oxford University temporarily put on hold clinical trials for their Covid-19 serum after a participant showed an adverse reaction. In the U.S., President Donald Trump has politicized coronavirus vaccine approvals, insisting a serum was likely to be approved by election day (Nov. 3), despite reservations expressed by regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    While the trials are still ongoing, the WHO, physicians and vaccine manufacturers have already begun to develop different scenarios for the distribution of a serum once it has been approved. A vaccine shortage is likely in the early stages, and the issue of fair sharing has yet to be resolved. Several high-income countries have already secured contracts with leading pharmaceutical and life science companies, putting lower income countries at risk of missing out on a coronavirus vaccine.

    To avoid this scenario, Thailand is developing its own vaccine. The kingdom is keen to avoid a repeat of its 2009 experience when the swine flu hit Asia. Although a vaccine against the swine flu was ready within two months after the outbreak, and Thailand had worked out deals with overseas developers to buy 2 million doses, the goods arrived only after the pandemic had subsided. By the time it was over, the virus had infected more than 47,000 Thais and killed 347.    

    First of its kind

    Although Thailand has been doing comparatively well in the Covid-19 crisis, with roughly 3,600 infections out of its 68 million population by the end of September, the country nevertheless wants to avoid depending on imports. In August, the Thai government gave thb1 billion ($31.6 million) to the National Vaccine Institute (NVI) to support development and production of vaccines against the coronavirus and other diseases. Compared to other nations, the sum is small—the U.S. federal government, for example, has invested more than $9 billion, spread among seven companies, in the development of a Covid-19 vaccine. But if one of Thailand’s vaccine candidates will be approved for human trials, it will be the first such anticoronavirus vaccine developed in Southeast Asia.

    “Governmental funding in Thailand is quite limited,” explains Waranyoo Phoolcharoen, associate professor in the Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Botany of Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok and head of development for a Covid-19 vaccine candidate. “To date, most vaccines are imported. There is currently no facility to produce the vaccine entirely—from laboratory to manufacturing and human trial—in Thailand.”

    Chulalongkorn University, which has two centers in vaccine research and development, has become the focus of present vaccine developments against the coronavirus in Thailand. One initiative has applied mRNA technology transferred from the U.S., and another is using tobacco plants to develop an inoculation.

    Tobacco plants have proven their potential as an efficient biopharmaceutical producer of vaccines. It’s a road other contenders in the race for a cure have chosen as well, among them U.S.-based Kentucky BioProcessing, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, and Medicago, a privately held Canadian biotech company in which Philip Morris International bought a stake in 2008.

    Basically, the manufacturing process involves identification and reception of genetic sequences from a pandemic strain to produce a virus-like particle (VLP), or antigen. VLPs resemble a virus, allowing them to be recognized readily by the immune system, but they lack the core genetic material, making them noninfectious and unable to replicate. Before the genetic construct representing the protein of interest is inserted, plants are seeded, germinate and grow. They are then genetically modified with the VLP in a technique known as transient expression.

    With this transformation, plants incubate for several days during which they are reproducing the target protein. At this point, they are harvested and crushed to create a green-juice slurry. This liquid passes through filtration processes and sophisticated purification techniques to produce a final product. The process, which employs Nicotiana benthamiana, a close relative of the tobacco type used for cigarette production, can deliver a vaccine for testing in less than a month after production of the VLP.

    Using tobacco plant technology has several advantages over conventional vaccine production processes. It can reproduce the antigen consistently with high fidelity and allows for rapid production of scale within a short period of time. It is also potentially safer given the fact that tobacco plants can’t host pathogens that cause human disease. In contrast to conventional vaccines, which often require refrigeration, a tobacco plant-based formulation remains stable at room temperature, making it suitable for distribution in warmer climates.

    For Thailand, using tobacco has the additional advantage that the country can rely on its own resources, says Phoolcharoen. According to The Bangkok Post, Thailand has 10,450 tobacco growers, of whom 15 have production capacity of more than 12,000 kg a year. “Although we use different species of the tobacco used for cigarette manufacture, people have approached us and want to grow tobacco for our vaccine. The cost for tobacco cultivation is very low in Thailand—farmers view it as a business opportunity. Although funding is limited, molecular pharming matches the country.”

    Plant technology reproduces antigens with high fidelity and allows manufacturers to rapidly scale up production.

    A chance for young researchers

    For Phoolcharoen and her team, the Covid-19 vaccine project represents a unique opportunity. Eighteen months ago, she established Baiya Phytopharm, a biopharmaceutical startup, together with Suthira Taychakhoonavudh. The plant technology-based platform can produce biopharmaceutical products within weeks rather than months or years, which results in faster and lower cost research and development, Phoolcharoen points out. The team also worked on a cure for the hand-mouth-foot virus, which is widespread among infants in Thailand. The company also has products against rabies, cancer and the Ebola virus in the pipeline. With the advent of Covid-19, the platform shifted its focus and capacity completely to produce SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

    If approved by Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the company’s vaccine would be the first to be produced from the laboratory to clinical trials in the country, Phoolcharoen says. “The business environment in Thailand differs largely insofar that the big pharmaceutical players only have their marketing side in our country but not the R&D and manufacture. For graduates in Thailand’s pharma industry, this means that there are hardly any adequate jobs. As a consequence, there is a lot of brain drain among highly qualified young scientists.”

    Baiya Phytopharm aims to promote the commercialization of biopharma research in Thailand. “With the startup, I wanted to create a workplace for my students,” explains Phoolcharoen. “The company is based on the campus. My partner, the CEO of Baiya Phytopharm, is also a faculty member in the faculty of pharmaceutical sciences [at] Chulalongkorn University. She is a pharmacoeconomist taking care of business models, marketing and fundraising. I am responsible for research and use the platform for my students to give them practical lessons and experience. The students are all employees of Baiya Phytopharm and use the company’s project as their theses. We have post-doctoral researchers, Ph.D., master and undergraduate students presently work on different variations of the Covid-19 vaccine. This way, the students learn about planning, marketing—and about being rushed. We hope that there will be more biopharma startups like us in Thailand. The ecosystem will build up the capacity in the country, and in the future, we will be able to develop drugs and vaccines in the region, for the region.”

    Advertisement

    Positive results

    In March 2020, Baiya Phytopharm launched a Covid-19 test kit and started studying its vaccine candidates in mice. Further trials of the vaccine on monkeys in June showed promising results: All primates generated neutralizing antibodies, which means that the antibodies induced by the candidate vaccine can block the coronavirus from penetrating or damaging cells. Meanwhile, the company has started toxicology testing on rats and is preparing for the clinical trial phase, which it hopes to begin next year in June.

    Much of the timing depends on finding the right facilities for the production process. “In order to be allowed for use in humans, the tobacco plants with the inserted Covid-19 proteins need to be purified; tobacco proteins have to be removed,” says Phoolcharoen. “There are only two facilities in Thailand which can be used, but they have never done any purification of proteins.”

    Her company is in talks with the NVI to see if it is ready to collaborate in the purification process of the vaccine candidates. If so, the vaccine could be ready for human trials around the beginning of next year. Otherwise, a new plant would have to be built, delaying the process by about nine months. Once facilities are available, more than 10 million doses of the vaccine could be produced in one month. The aim is to offer an affordable vaccine, possibly also to other Southeast Asian countries.

    So far, Baiya Phytopharm mostly used the co-founders’ money and the donation for a Covid-19 test kit for its vaccine research. However, the startup is raising funds to finance the phase I clinical trial and is hoping for private investors. “We will start with a crowdfunding campaign,” says Phoolcharoen. To her, the vaccine development is a long-term engagement. “We know that something like the Covid-19 outbreak is likely to happen again. So it makes sense to be prepared.”

    Baiya Phytopharm employees are working on different variations of the Covid-19 vaccine.
  • BAT Vaccine May Start Clinical Trials Soon

    BAT Vaccine May Start Clinical Trials Soon

    Tobacco companies have joined the race to develop a vaccine against Covid-19
    Image: Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

    British American Tobacco’s (BAT) experimental Covid-19 vaccine may start clinical trials within weeks, reports Bloomberg, citing BAT Chief Marketing Officer Kingsley Wheaton.

    The maker of Lucky Strike cigarettes said it expects a response from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) any day now.

    Kingsley Wheaton

    “We’re optimistic,” Wheaton said. “It’s an important part of our strategy to try and build a better tomorrow.”

    In April BAT announced it was developing a Covid-19 vaccine from tobacco leaves and could produce 1 million to 3 million doses per week if it got the support of government agencies and the right manufacturers.

    Earlier this year, BAT submitted a pre-investigative new drug application to the FDA. It is also talking with other government agencies about the vaccine.

    Multiple companies from a variety of sectors have been racing to develop a vaccine for Covid-19, with some of the vaccines already in human trials. Experts have suggested that a Covid-19 vaccine could take 12-18 months to develop.

    BAT said it has committed funds to conduct clinical trials. The company has reportedly also invested in additional equipment to boost capacity. The company’s investment in a Covid-19 vaccine were covered in-depth in Tobacco Reporter’s June issue.

    Medicago, a biotechnology company partly owned by Philip Morris International, is also developing a plant-based vaccine that could be available in the first half of 2021.

    There are 24 vaccine candidates in clinical trials, though nine out of 10 such programs typically fail during trials, according to the World Health Organization.

  • Shots on Goal

    Shots on Goal

    Two tobacco plant-based vaccine candidates have entered the race for a serum against Covid-19.

    By Stefanie Rossel

    Photos: British American Tobacco

    As the coronavirus pandemic continues to take a devastating toll around the world, the race for a vaccine against Covid-19 among pharmaceutical and biotech companies, universities, research institutes and other stakeholders has accelerated. According to a report by Verband Forschender Arzneimittelhersteller, the German association of researching drug manufacturers, there were more than 70 vaccine projects for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 globally in early April. The aim of such a vaccine is to create an adaptive immune response in the form of antigens in the vaccinated person that will protect against an invading microorganism and the disease it causes, in this case an infection with the coronavirus. Vaccines, which are biological preparations, are considered the most effective preventive measures against infectious diseases.

    Coronaviruses, a group of viruses that belong to the family Coronaviridae, have always been around. Infections caused by other members of that family include severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which appeared in 2002 to 2003, and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), which appeared in September 2012. On both occasions, vaccines were developed, but to date, none of them has received drug approval—in comparison with other infectious diseases, such as influenza and HIV, SARS and MERS produced relatively few and locally restricted cases, thus lowering the willingness to further invest in vaccine development. Nevertheless, this earlier research may now help scientists in their quest for an antidote against SARS-CoV-2, which, with its high transmission rate and resulting numerous deaths, is of a different caliber.

    To combat the novel virus, scientists have a range of processes at their disposal. Depending on the disease-causing agents, how it infects the cell and how the immune system responds to it, they decide which type of vaccine might be the most promising. Current options include live attenuated vaccines, which use a weakened form of the virus or bacteria that causes a disease, and inactivated vaccines that contain bacteria or viruses that have been killed by a chemical treatment or heat. Subunit, recombinant, polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines use specific pieces of the virus or bacteria—like its protein, sugar or capsid. Finally, toxoid vaccines use a toxin made by the virus or bacteria that causes a disease.

    In the production of vaccines, embryonated chicken eggs play an important role. In 1931, they were discovered to be the perfect bioreactors for growing viruses and thus the best tool to produce vaccines. Almost 90 years later, 95 percent of all flu vaccine doses still contain egg-grown viruses, according to the German Max Planck Society. It’s easy to imagine that this production process will quickly near its limits in the case of a pandemic that affects millions of people.

    Advertisement

    Tobacco as a bioreactor

    Enter tobacco. Since the early 2000s, the plant has proven its potential as a highly efficient biopharmaceutical producer of vaccines—more precisely, of recombinant therapeutical proteins. Basically, the process involves identification and reception of genetic sequences from a pandemic strain to produce a virus-like particle (VLP). VLPs resemble a virus, allowing them to be recognized readily by the immune system; however, they lack the core genetic material, making them noninfectious and unable to replicate. Before the genetic construct representing the protein of interest is inserted, plants are seeded, germinate and grow. They are then genetically modified with the VLP—or antigen—in a technique known as transient expression. With this transformation, plants incubate for several days during which they are reproducing the target protein. At this point, they are harvested and crushed to create a green juice slurry. This liquid passes through filtration processes and sophisticated purification techniques to produce a final product. Reportedly, the process, which employs Nicotiana benthamiana, a close relative of the tobacco type used for cigarette manufacture, can deliver a vaccine for testing in less than a month after production of the VLP.

    In a virus outbreak such as the current one, rapid serum production of scale is vital. Two biopharmaceutical companies working with tobacco-based systems joined the race early on for a vaccine. Medicago, a privately held Canadian biotech company in which Philip Morris International bought a stake in 2008, in April announced that its candidate coronavirus vaccine could be ready for human trials by July or August; the company plans to submit a dossier to authorities to get approval for the drug by November 2021.

    Kentucky Bioprocessing’s plant-based vaccine has several potential advantages over conventional serum production technology, including safety, speed of development and stability at room temperature.

    Advantages over conventional technologies

    David O’Reilly

    The other player is U.S.-based Kentucky Bioprocessing (KBP), a subsidiary of British American Tobacco (BAT). The company’s candidate vaccine uses BAT’s proprietary fast-growing plant technology and TAP platform, a new system for vaccine production that allows antigen selection closer to the time it is needed to avoid mutations. The serum is presently also in the pre-clinical testing phase that is expected to finish soon. “We have been engaging with government agencies to bring our candidate vaccine to clinical testing as soon as possible,” explains David O’Reilly, BAT’s director of scientific research. On May 15, the company announced that it was ready to start testing its vaccine on humans once it gets approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

    Through collaborations with government and third-party manufacturers, KBP hopes to produce between 1 million and 3 million doses per week from June, says O’Reilly. “We will be ready to start clinical trials in late June and start manufacturing in parallel. It is impossible to say when it will be available, and this will become clearer when we know what testing governments will require.”

    The plant-based vaccine has several potential advantages over conventional serum production technology, according to O’Reilly. “It is potentially safer given that tobacco plants can’t host pathogens which cause human disease. It is faster because the elements of the vaccine accumulate in tobacco plants much more quickly and with high fidelity—six weeks in tobacco plants versus several months using conventional methods. The vaccine formulation KBP is developing remains stable at room temperature, unlike conventional vaccines, which often require refrigeration. And it reproduces the antigen with high fidelity every time without making unwanted changes.”

    He is not worried about the frequent headlines about the progress of other conventional vaccine manufacturers. “This is noncompetitive, and BAT is fully prepared to work with other vaccine companies with our unique vaccine development technologies,” says O’Reilly. “As such, BAT is looking for help from governments to accelerate clinical trials to demonstrate the candidate vaccine is safe and effective. We also need help with downstream manufacturing in terms of conjugation and dispensing and are open to working with governments and other partners to build scaled-up manufacturing.”

    Advertisement

    Long-winded approval process

    Even though other candidate vaccines appear to be one step ahead, it doesn’t mean that they will be the first and only ones that become approved and commercially available. Each new vaccine project must go through a six-stage process to get approval by the FDA or the European Medicines Agency. The stages include analysis of the virus, design of the vaccine and animal testing in the pre-clinical phase, which is followed by trials with volunteers, approval procedure and mass production of the vaccine. Although the process has been significantly accelerated in recent years due to new technology and previous experience with serum developments against related viruses, it may nevertheless take up to 36 months—under normal conditions. Will the unprecedented dimensions of the Covid-19 pandemic speed up matters?

    “Testing any vaccine candidate for safety and efficacy is paramount. This requires extensive and complex clinical testing and evaluation of the results,” O’Reilly explains. “During clinical testing and through pharmacovigilance, i.e., drug safety assessment, potential side effects can be identified. If they are serious then this is likely to mean the vaccine will not be authorized for use. Under pandemic emergency situations, regulators have the option of ‘emergency use authorization.’ The U.S. FDA authorized our ZMapp Ebola treatment through this pathway in 2014.”

    Together with Mapp Biopharmaceutical, KBP developed an Ebola drug that came to be considered the standard of care after a small study suggested it might reduce mortality rates. Long-term studies, however, showed that the treatment didn’t provide the anticipated degree of protection, so it failed to receive permanent approval.

    Each new vaccine project must go through a six-stage process to get approval by the FDA or the European Medicines Agency.

    Costly development

    Time can become the decisive hurdle in drug development. History has shown that the search for a suitable vaccine sometimes is too slow: In 2009, the swine flu outbreak quickly waned, leaving drug makers sitting on their vaccine. “That’s a real problem and it remains to be seen how quickly vaccines can be developed, tested and approved in the case of Covid-19,” says O’Reilly. “We must also remember that there are other lines of attack being developed such as treatments to reduce the effects of the disease once contracted. There’s also an emerging view that SARS-CoV-2 may be with us for some time and return every year in the way that the seasonal flu virus does. If this happens then vaccines will play an important role.”

    Historically, just 6 percent of vaccine candidates end up making it to market, according to a Reuters report. “Vaccine development is tremendously challenging and complex. Most candidates will fail during development, so it’s great news that so many candidates are being developed for Covid-19. Of the 75 plus in development, hopefully enough will succeed to cover the world’s needs,” says O’Reilly.

    Developing a vaccine is also an enormous investment. According to the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, development of a vaccine and treatment will cost $1 billion each. “We are in the early days of this, and the costs are not yet significant. Total costs will become clearer when we better understand the testing requirements going forward,” says O’Reilly.

    While remaining a commercial operation, KBP intends to carry out its Covid-19 vaccine work on a not-for-profit basis. “The most important issue here is to find a vaccine that beats the virus,” O’Reilly says. “It is about collaboration for the greater good and the benefit of society at large. That’s why for Covid-19, we are operating on a ‘not-for-profit’ basis.”