Category: Press Releases

  • DON EMMANUEL CIGARS EXPANDS INTO SOUTH AFRICA THROUGH NEW DISTRIBUTION PARTNERSHIP

    PRESS RELEASE

    Brand continues international growth following recent Caribbean expansion

    Miami, FL – December 22, 2025 – Don Emmanuel Cigars announces its expansion into South Africa, marking the brand’s first entry into the African continent. The distribution agreement has been finalized with Amano Cigars, a respected importer and distributor of premium cigars in South Africa that also operates the Pedro Portia Cigar & Champagne Lounge, widely regarded as the country’s premier cigar destination, located at the Gantry Lifestyle Center in Fourways, Gauteng.

    This announcement follows the brand’s recent expansion across the Caribbean and Latin America, reinforcing a pattern of steady international growth driven by rising consumer interest in the brand’s debut line, Anunnaki.

    Anunnaki is co-blended by Don Emmanuel and legendary Master Blender Eladio Díaz and produced at Tabacalera Díaz Cabrera in the Dominican Republic. The line features seven distinct tobaccos, including a rare Dominican wrapper and a Mexican San Andrés Negro binder, and has earned attention for its balance, evolution, and expressive smoking experience.

    Born in São Paulo, Brazil, Don Emmanuel combines formal expertise with deep personal tobacco heritage. A Master Cigar Sommelier, his passion was shaped early through his family, including his grandmother’s work with Suerdieck, once the world’s largest cigar manufacturer. Decades of study, factory visits, and collaboration with industry leaders continue to inform his refined approach to blending.

    The brand’s expansion is supported by a diverse leadership team combining creative, blending, and commercial expertise.

    Martin Olivier Weber, a Swiss-born global executive, brings decades of senior leadership experience from multinational companies including Nestlé and PepsiCo, with a background in general management, marketing, and international growth strategy.

    Alejandro Mejía Garagorry, International Sales Director and Partner, contributes more than two decades of experience in global sales and market development, having held senior roles at PepsiCo and Mondelez International across the Americas.

    “Our focus has always been on building something meaningful and lasting,” said Martin Olivier Weber, Partner, Don Emmanuel Cigars. “We are taking a disciplined approach to growth, entering markets that appreciate craftsmanship, culture, and authenticity. South Africa represents a strong strategic step in that journey.”

    With Amano Cigars serving as the official distributor, Don Emmanuel Cigars will now be introduced to a growing South African market known for its sophisticated cigar consumers and established lounge culture. The presence of Pedro Portia provides a natural cultural platform for the brand within the region.

    All three vitolas of the Anunnaki line — Anu (6 x 52 Toro), Ki (5 x 50 Robusto), and Corona Fina (4 x 38, Tin of 5) — will be available through the South African distribution channel.

  • Effected Oral Bacteria Could be Harnessed for Cessation: Study

    Effected Oral Bacteria Could be Harnessed for Cessation: Study

    A study by Dr. Nishant Mehta, associate professor at PGIMER (Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research), Chandigarh, India, found that prolonged use of smokeless tobacco alters the oral microbiome, promoting the growth of bacteria capable of breaking down nicotine. The research suggests these “nicotinophilic” microbes adapt to repeated nicotine exposure by using it as an energy source. The findings indicate that these microbial changes could potentially be harnessed to support future tobacco cessation strategies.

    Presented at the 29th IAPHD National Conference (NATCON 2025) in Mangaluru, the study earned the Best Paper Award. Researchers analyzed saliva samples from smokeless tobacco users using advanced molecular techniques and confirmed that certain oral bacteria can actively metabolize nicotine. While further research is needed, experts say the study offers a new biological perspective on nicotine dependence and oral health.

  • Tobacco Industry Alarmed at Bangladesh’s Policy-Making Exclusion

    In a unified statement, the industry leaders, British American Tobacco Bangladesh (BATB), Philip Morris Bangladesh, and JT International Bangladesh, said:
    “While we fully support the Government’s commitment to public health, we believe that the certain measures proposed in the draft ordinance are not evidence-based, and will jeopardize the local livelihoods, further fuel an already growing illicit tobacco market, result in government tax revenue leak, and discourage further foreign investment – ultimately severely impacting an already declining industry.

    “Amongst multiple detrimental clauses, the draft includes an ingredient ban, which poses direct threat to the current cigarette operations in the country entirely. The ingredients included in the proposal for ban are essential for processing, manufacturing, and preservation, and are critical to ensure product integrity. In addition, other business-critical clauses, such as mandating retailers license to sell cigarettes, will impact the current 1.5 million retailers and disrupt the legal sales of tobacco products to the retailers and the operations of associated 150,000 tobacco farmers, until the licenses are made available to all the impacted parties and this requires a fair and transparent process with proper consultation.

    “Furthermore, the proposed prohibition of smokeless nicotine and tobacco products will take away legitimate choices for adult nicotine consumers, who are looking for reduced risk profile alternatives compared to combustible cigarettes, to transition from combustible tobacco. A de-facto ban on these important product categories will further boost an existing illicit market with compromised quality products, as seen in other countries such as India and Australia. The illicit products will not be controlled by any standards to ensure product quality, further increasing the risk for consumer access to these products.”

    “Enacting the proposed Bill without a holistic stakeholder-inclusive consultation poses significant risks to Bangladesh’s economy and public health objectives. We urge the Government to consider the views of manufacturers, impacted farmers, marginalized retailers, hawkers, printers, and others in the value chain, to avoid the negative, unintended consequences caused by these proposed amendments. We are fully committed to collaborating with the Government, alongside other stakeholders, to find a balanced and comprehensive solution.”

  • GUIDE TO SELLING NICOTINE POUCHES IN THE UK: Everything retailers should know 

    The UK nicotine pouch market has evolved from a marginal phenomenon into a rapidly growing and increasingly important segment of the smoke-free nicotine category. For retailers, this means a need to respond to a wholesale shift in consumer purchasing habits. Keeping up with demand is important, but for this category, simply stocking the products is not enough. The staff selling the products must also have a sound level of understanding to meet customer expectations and help them make informed purchasing decisions. 

    Here, Markus Lindblad, from Northerner, shares the essential guide to selling nicotine pouches and what every retailer should know. 

    What are customers looking for when it comes to nicotine pouches?

    For UK customers, there are three key factors to consider. Price, flavour, and nicotine strength. As the market matures, we could expect to see factors such as moisture level and pouch size become more important to consumers, but at the moment, it’s the three fundamentals of price, flavours and strength that consumers are focused on. 

    For retailers, this means the priority is less on stocking a wide variety of different brand names, and more about having a good range of flavours and different nicotine strengths. If you can keep a good range of flavour and strength options for the customer, and keep stock up to date with innovative new products, then you’re already ahead. 

    Flavours and Strength – where to start?

    Nicotine pouches come in an increasingly wide variety of flavours, however, the traditional core flavours remain the most popular. Mint is by far the most popular flavour in the UK, found in six out of ten cans sold (59%). Fruit flavours come in second place, making up 22% of cans sold, followed by citrus at 8%.

    There is a wide range of strengths available, and we would recommend stocking everything from normal strength, which is 1.5–6 mg per pouch, up to extra strong, which ranges from 9.1–20 mg per pouch. The British Standards Institute recommends a maximum level of 20mg of nicotine per pouch, and reputable retailers should stay below this threshold. 

    What knowledge should staff be equipped with when it comes to talking to customers about nicotine pouches? 

    It’s really important that staff know how to guide customers on using the products correctly, explain to the customer how to select an appropriate strength level, and to give them some idea of what to expect from the experience. Most pouch users will be former or current smokers, so first find out about their current nicotine consumption habits, and help them to make informed choices about the strength that might work for them. 

    For someone trying a pouch for the first time, the experience may not be as expected, particularly if they have opted for a stronger variety. Generally, anything over 20g of nicotine is too strong for most users, and not something we would advise stocking.

    How do I explain the difference between snus and nicotine pouches?

    In the UK, the product is often confused with traditional Swedish snus, which contains tobacco, and ‘snus’ has become a common way of describing nicotine pouches amongst consumers. However, traditional Swedish snus is illegal in the UK. It’s important to help customers understand the distinction between tobacco-containing snus and non-tobacco containing nicotine pouches.

    How should I advise customers when it comes to brand recommendations?

    The UK pouch market is not yet mature, and so there is very little brand loyalty. UK consumers are open to trying different brands and formats of pouches. Just over a third (34%) stick consistently with the same product, while 66% rotate between two or more different products. For six in ten pouch users (59%), it’s actually price that is the main motivation to switch products. Value is king for the UK pouch consumer, so if you have any offers or deals, make sure to shout about this!

  • Duran Cigars Returns to the U.S. Market, Marking a New Era with the Addition of Roberto Duran Jr.

    PRESS RELEASE

    The company’s U.S. return is anchored by its new headquarters and distribution center in Little Havana

    Little Havana, Miami, FL — November 12, 2025 — After years of remarkable success in Europe and Asia, Duran Cigars proudly announces its return to the U.S. market. The company’s renewed presence marks the beginning of a new era for the family-owned brand, led by industry veteran Roberto Pelayo Duran and strengthened by the addition of his son, Roberto Pelayo Duran Jr.

    Founded in 2013, Roberto Duran Premium Cigars made its debut at the IPCPR Trade Show in Las Vegas, introducing a portfolio that embodied the best of Cuban heritage and modern craftsmanship. Following a strong reception in the United States, Roberto Duran made the strategic decision to concentrate on the company’s global expansion—developing a 100-hectare farm in Quevedo, Ecuador, expanding the factory in Estelí, Nicaragua, and establishing a strong footprint across Europe and the Asian market. While his focus abroad allowed the company to grow its reputation for quality and consistency, it also set the stage for this year’s highly anticipated comeback to the U.S.

    “Concentrating on our farm and global markets allowed us to perfect our production and strengthen our foundation,” said Roberto Pelayo Duran, Founder and CEO. “Now, with my son joining the business, we have the right team and structure in place to reestablish our presence in the United States while continuing to grow internationally.”

    The company’s U.S. return is anchored by its new headquarters and distribution center in Little Havana (3141 SW 8th Street, Miami)—a location that doubles as a retail cigar shop and lounge. The new space serves as the brand’s American home base, connecting its global operations to the heart of Miami’s cigar culture.

    Fueling this expansion is Roberto Pelayo Duran Jr., who joins as Marketing and Sales Manager. A graduate of the University of British Columbia (B.A. Political Science) and University of Notre Dame (M.S. Business Management), Duran Jr. brings a fresh, globally minded perspective to the family enterprise. His hands-on experience in Estelí and Quevedo—from fermentation and leaf selection to cigar rolling—has shaped a deep understanding of the craft and the people behind it.

    “Working alongside my father has shown me how passion and precision come together to create something lasting,” said Duran Jr. “With our vertically integrated structure and our new Miami headquarters, we’re ready to share Duran Cigars with U.S. retailers and enthusiasts once again.”

    With the addition of Roberto Jr. and its expanded infrastructure, Duran Cigars is poised for a powerful U.S. comeback—one built on family legacy, craftsmanship, and global success.

    About Duran Cigars

    Roberto Pelayo Duran began his lifelong journey in his native Havana, Cuba—where tobacco captured his passion and never let go. His early years overseeing cigar production in Cuba set the foundation for a career defined by craftsmanship and precision. He later advanced to manage the distribution of all Cuban cigar brands throughout Asia and Canada with The Pacific Cigar Company Ltd., further deepening his global expertise. His tenure with British American Tobacco expanded his experience to Middle East, Africa and the Americas. The creation of Duran Cigars gave Roberto the platform to craft and distribute cigars that embody the same excellence, construction, and character he demanded from the world’s finest. Today, Duran Cigars proudly represents a portfolio that includes Roberto Duran, Azan, Neya, Baracoa and Nicatabaco, each reflecting authentic heritage, meticulous blending, and the artistry that defines the Duran name.

  • From bans to balance: how Malaysia can finally win the war on smoking

    By Dr. Arifin Fii, President, Advanced Centre for Addiction Treatment Advocacy (ACATA)

    Malaysia has long aspired to become a smoke-free nation. Yet despite years of health laws and taxation regimes, one in five Malaysian adults still smoke today – that’s around 4 million adults.[i]

    Smoking is increasingly viewed as a public health issue. The shift to vaping is seen as both a challenge and an opportunity for harm reduction, though regulation remains fragmented across states. However, Western public policy and proven results are often ignored.

    Europe’s Alternative Nicotine to Cut Smoking Rates

    Smoke-Free Sweden 2024: Missing the Target[ii] reports the European Union (EU) nations face a similar challenge. 24% of EU adults still smoke, a decline of just 1% since 2020, despite decades of strict laws and high taxes.

    Ireland’s smoking rate is 18% against their 5% by 2025 goal, despite ban on disposable vapes and newly introduced highest in EU vape tax. The Netherlands smoking rate stands at 19%, only a 1% drop since 2020, despite restricting e-cigarette sales to specialist shops. Denmark’s regulation on alternative nicotine has stalled momentum altogether.

    Sweden adopted a tobacco harm reduction (THR) strategy by utilizing non-combusted nicotine products nearly achieved smoke-free status (smoking rate between 5.6%–8%) and is expected to reach its 2025 target ahead of schedule. By recognizing proven results in alternative nicotine products, Sweden proved THR can bring real results.

    Together, these examples underline one truth: Prohibition Does Not Work. When governments restrict less harmful alternatives, smokers are more likely to stick with cigarettes, delaying progress toward a smoke-free future.

    The science behind THR is compelling. The Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom has found that vaping is at least 95% less harmful than smoking[iii]. The real danger from tobacco is not the nicotine itself, but the thousands of toxic chemicals released when it is burned. While long-term data on vaping continues to evolve, the current evidence consistently shows it to be far less harmful, and many smokers use it as a transition tools.

    Nicotine addiction, as any clinician knows, is not a moral failing but a medical condition that requires compassion and treatment. Many smokers genuinely want to quit but struggle with withdrawal and limited cessation tools. THR provides a pragmatic middle ground, helping smokers move away from the most harmful form of nicotine consumption without punishment or stigma.

    Malaysia’s Enigma

    Malaysia’s Ministry of Health recognizes that smoking leads to more than 27,000 preventable deaths every year.[iv] Smoking-related illnesses cost the nation billions of ringgits in healthcare spending annually. Despite these staggering numbers, our policy landscape remains uncertain. More alarmingly, it does not distinct the notable difference between carcinogen-induced diseases from cigarette smoking versus vape or e-cigarettes.

    Malaysia missed an opportunity to really nip the problem in the bud when the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 took effect about 1-year ago. Harm reduction is not recognised as part of our national tobacco control strategy. Current measures treat all nicotine products as equally harmful, overlooking the opportunity to reduce smoking through less harmful, regulated, nicotine alternatives.

    As discussions on whether to impose stricter measures or even a total vape ban continues, we must shift the conversation from viewing vape as a problem to seeing it as a potential public health tool with stricter enforcement for underage access. To do this responsibly will require commitment from all stakeholders: through education, enforcement and regulations that ensures safety while supporting smokers who want to quit.

    Learning from Proven Strategies

    Sweden’s success offers valuable lessons. Instead of treating all nicotine products as equally harmful, the government adopted a risk-proportionate regulatory approach, giving smokers less harmful, affordable and accessible options. This principle could guide Malaysia’s next step. By creating a clear framework for less harmful alternatives, we can reduce smoking prevalence.

    The United Kingdom’s National Health Service (NHS) has incorporated e-cigarettes into its smoking cessation framework, and New Zealand’s regulatory action plan balances access to vaping products with youth protection measures.

    Harm reduction is not a new concept in healthcare. It saves lives by meeting people where they are, not where we wish them to be. The same principle should guide tobacco control: helping smokers transition, not punishing them for struggling.

    Sweden’s journey proves that a smoke-free future does not require eliminating nicotine altogether, only eliminating the harm that comes from burning it. By giving smokers choices rooted in science and compassion, the country reached its goal years ahead of schedule and improved public health outcomes nationwide. Malaysia can do the same, but it will take courage from policymakers, support from health advocates and trust in the evidence.


    [i] National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2023

    [ii] Smoke-Free Sweden 2024: Missing the Target

    [iii] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e-cigarettes-around-95-less-harmful-than-tobacco-estimates-landmark-review

    [iv] Institute for Public Health (IPH) Malaysia, Tobacco and E-Cigarette Survey 2023

  • ‘Close the loophole’: 84% of Brits support stronger rules on nicotine pouches

    PRESS RELEASE

    Public backs tighter regulation of nicotine pouches as government reviews public health policies 

    A new survey by Northerner on the public’s attitudes to changing public health policies has revealed that the British public overwhelmingly supports the regulation of nicotine pouches and stronger protections for young people. As the government moves to introduce new laws on tobacco and nicotine through the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, the survey results show that the vast majority of respondents support the introduction of regulation on nicotine pouches to ensure responsible use and consumer safety.

    According to the survey, 84% of respondents agreed that the government should introduce new regulations for nicotine pouches. The findings suggest that people recognise that these products need to be regulated in the same way as cigarettes and vapes and support action to bring the UK’s policies up to date. 

    Beyond nicotine pouch regulation, the survey also revealed support for government plans to introduce a licensing scheme for the sale of vapes (82%).  Concern for young people’s well-being in digital spaces was also evident. 81% of respondents agreed there should be age restrictions on using social media, while 75% backed the recent law on ID checks before accessing online pornography. These figures highlight the public’s concern about the exposure of young people to harmful content online and support for stronger digital safeguards.

    The survey results suggest that while many people feel the UK is becoming a ‘nanny state’, there are specific areas where they support the introduction of additional regulation.

    The areas where respondents supported increasing regulation are:

    1. Introducing new regulations for nicotine pouches – 84%
    2. Creating a licensing scheme for the sale of vapes – 82%
    3. Age restrictions on social media – 81%
    4. Compulsory physical education in schools – 78%
    5. ID checks before accessing online pornography – 75%
    6. School dinner nutrition regulations – 74%

    Markus Lindblad, Head of External Affairs at Northerner, said: “These results show that there are some areas of modern life where the public wants the government to take a more active role and to introduce new regulations. A good example is the overwhelming support for the regulation of nicotine pouches. On this issue, the public, government, and responsible retailers are totally aligned. At the moment, a legal loophole means that there is no minimum age limit on the purchase of nicotine pouches, and this has been exploited by unscrupulous retailers. This survey shows that the public wants action, and there is strong support for the government’s move to close this loophole through the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.”

  • Will the Conference of the Parties (COP11) in 2025 support tobacco harm reduction?

    Will the Conference of the Parties (COP11) in 2025 support tobacco harm reduction?

    PRESS RELEASE

    By Professor Praneet Valodia, Director Praneet Valodia Consulting

    The Eleventh session of the Conference of the Parties (COP11) to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) will be taking place in Geneva, Switzerland, 17-22 November 2025. This governing body will discuss updates to the FCTC with 183 parties which include 182 countries and the European Union. I am wondering whether COP 11 will be considering the scientific evidence with regards to tobacco harm reduction. Tobacco harm reduction involves using safer non-combustible nicotine products such as heated tobacco products, e-cigarettes, snus and nicotine pouches instead of combustible cigarettes.

    It is concerning that cigarette smoking still claims about 8 million lives each year considering that smoking is a preventable cause of disease. Harm reduction is a public health strategy that is compassionate, people-centred, choice-focused, and rights-based. In addition, there is a 60-99% reduction in toxicants in non-combustible nicotine products relative to combustible cigarettes (U.S. FDA). Non-combustible nicotine products show greater efficacy than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and are similar in adverse events to NRT (Cochrane Report, 2024). Based on these results, smokers should be switched to these products. We have a moral obligation to advise smokers to use these safer products.

    Smokers’ choice of an intervention for smoking cessation is key. Nothing is 100% risk-free. Tobacco harm reduction products are not without risk, but it is beneficial for smokers, particularly those who are unable or unwilling to quit smoking, to switch to a lower-risk nicotine product. COP, should like the U.S. FDA, evaluate the relative risk between combustible cigarettes and non-combustible nicotine products. Has COP evaluated the benefits and risk of  non-combustible nicotine products to determine the net benefit to public health? It does not appear to be so. Taking isolated factors into account, such as youth uptake only, is not an optimal approach.

    I am hoping that COP11 will bring about transformative change in assisting over a billion smokers throughout the world. There is a lack of evidence in South Africa to show a reduction in cigarette smoking because of interventions promoted in the FCTC. Considering the low adoption of the interventions in the FCTC and MPOWER measures, and the fact that the global smoking trends have not changed substantially after the FCTC’s adoption in 2003, it is time for tobacco harm reduction to become even more important. This is the paradigm shift in mindset that is required. Real-world evidence shows that the FCTC has failed to make an impact. Hence, it may not be fit for purpose. In vulnerable low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs),  like South Africa, small incremental changes may not be effective. For example, increasing the nonsmoking area in a restaurant. This is an effective measure for affluent people who can afford to eat in restaurants; however, the majority of South Africans cannot afford to eat in restaurants. Although such a measure is in place in South Africa, the prevalence of smoking has still  increased according to the Global Adult Tobacco survey (2021). Transformative change will involve introducing tobacco harm reduction with greater access to non-combustible nicotine products. Sweden and New Zealand are on the brink of becoming smoke-free due to the wide acceptance of tobacco harm reduction despite FCTC policies.

    In South Africa, a significant number of fires, including those in homes and vegetation, are attributed to discarded cigarettes. Smoking is also a leading cause of residential fires, with incidents like people falling asleep while smoking or cigarettes igniting furniture. A huge proportion of South Africans live in shacks made from pieces of wood or other materials in informal settlements that burn due to fires as a result of combustible cigarettes. It is believed that switching to non-combustible products will also save lives due to the absence of fires. Has COP considered this for LMICs?

    It is hoped that COP11 will allow open discussions where differing opinions could be heard unlike the previous COP meetings. New evidence has emerged since the last COP meeting and this should be considered. Policies should be evidence-based, well planned and resourced, implementable and impactful in addressing socio-economic challenges. Will COP11 adopt this approach?

    There are about 120 million users of non-combustible nicotine products throughout the world. The presentation of experiences of the users of non-combustible products at COP11 should be encouraged. It is important that users of non-combustible products are provided with reliable and accurate information. COP unfortunately has not been facilitating this. Consumer acceptance has also not been focussed on. Similarly, health experts in tobacco harm reduction have also been excluded from previous COP meetings.

    There is a need for an independent scientific committee to evaluate the evidence and the reports should be available to the public for comment. This involves a selection process of publications to be evaluated, a meeting held to debate the findings and the publication of the findings with recommendations. This is a process used for medicines and there is no reason why the same approach cannot be used for non-combustible nicotine products. However, there also needs to be an independent review of the FCTC’s policies and practices.

    It is hoped that COP 11 will consider these factors in its deliberations to save lives. It is also hoped that the COP 11 will give effect to Article 1d of the FCTC in its definition of ‘tobacco control’ to incorporate harm reduction strategies that aims to improve the health of a population. It is hoped that COP 11 will not disregard local policymaking processes and the impact that these policies may have on local populations.

    REFERENCES

    U.S. FDA: Scientific Review of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application (MRTPA) under Section 911(d) of the FD&C Act – Technical Project Lead – 5/12/2016.

    Lindson N, Butler AR, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Theodoulou A, Notley C, Rigotti NA, Turner T, Livingstone-Banks J, Morris T, Hartmann-Boyce J. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024.

    Fire Protection Association of Southern Africa. Informal settlement Fires 2018.

    https://www.fpasa.co.za/140-informal-settlement-fires-2018#:~:text=The%20latest%20fire%20statistic,highest%20financial%20losses%20to%20date.
  • Banning Cigarette Filters: A Policy That Misses the Point

    Banning Cigarette Filters: A Policy That Misses the Point

    FROM: Tadas Lisauskas, CEO, Greenbutts

    As governments intensify tobacco regulations, some voices are calling for a ban on cigarette filters—arguing that filters provide no health benefit and merely make smoking more appealing. At first glance, it may seem intuitive: eliminate filters, and smoking becomes harsher, less attractive, and consumption declines. But public health must be grounded in science and practical outcomes—not symbolism. On closer inspection, a filter ban is both illogical and counterproductive.

    Filters Reduce Exposure—That Is an Undeniable Fact

    Cigarette smoke is a toxic aerosol composed of fine particles and chemicals that drive disease risk. The filter physically traps a portion of those particles before they reach the smoker’s mouth and lungs. This is not theory. Decades of standardized machine testing and mainstream smoke analysis confirm that filtered cigarettes deliver lower particulate-phase toxicants than unfiltered cigarettes. Regulators themselves have acknowledged this reality in scientific assessments of smoke yields and design features.

    Some critics point out that smokers may inhale more deeply or block ventilation holes, reducing the benefit. Yes—behavior can blunt improvements. But behavioral challenges are not evidence that filters fail to reduce toxicant delivery; they are evidence that behavior should be addressed, not the technology that reduces exposure when used as designed. In the continuum-of-risk framework accepted globally—where risk is driven by exposure multiplied by time—every credible reduction in toxicant delivery is directionally aligned with better health outcomes.

    Removing Filters Introduces New Consumer Safety Risks

    Filters are not only exposure-control components; they are the only protective barrier between burning tobacco and human tissue. They:

    • Prevent burns to lips and fingers by distancing consumers from the burning coal
    • Block tobacco fragments and ash from entering the mouth
    • Maintain structural integrity, hygiene, and a consistent mouthpiece

    Unfiltered cigarettes would reintroduce hazards society moved away from generations ago. A policy intended to protect public health should not expose consumers to additional, immediate physical harm.

    Environmental Progress Exists—So Why Go Backward?

    Yes, plastic cigarette butts are a legitimate environmental concern. But eliminating filters is not the only—or best—solution. Modern filter innovation has already delivered biodegradable, plant-based alternatives that break down quickly in natural conditions. These next-generation filters (e.g.: Greenbutts) retain functional filtration and safety benefits while eliminating the single-use-plastic waste associated with legacy cellulose acetate filters.

    Pretending that filters must be banned to solve littering is a false choice. The environmental problem can be solved without removing a proven exposure-reduction feature.

    A Ban That Helps No One

    Removing filters would:

    • Increase toxicant exposure by eliminating the primary filtration barrier
    • Re-introduce physical safety risks to consumers
    • Ignore biodegradable solutions that already resolve the litter issue
    • Disrupt product regulation designed around filtration performance and exposure science

    A filter ban does not reduce the harm of smoking. It only removes a layer of protection while ignoring practical, science-based solutions already available.

    Effective regulation should reduce disease, reduce exposure, and reduce environmental harm—not add new risks while removing existing protections.

    The smarter path is clear: preserve filters for their health-protective and safety functions, require biodegradable substrates to eliminate plastic litter, and support broader initiatives that reduce smoking overall. Public health deserves thoughtful policy—not blunt measures that create more harm than they prevent.

  • HARM REDUCTION MUST BE AT THE HEART OF TOBACCO CONTROL,SAYS EXPERT

    A public health expert who once served as a director in the World Health Organization (WHO) has explained why a stronger focus on harm reduction is needed in global tobacco control.

    Professor Tikki Pang, now part of Jakarta-based Centre for Healthcare Policy and Reform Studies, said 20 years ago the WHO introduced the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), which has been ratified by 183 countries covering 90% of the global population.

    He said the FCTC has led to a significant reduction in smoking prevalence around the world, particularly in rich and developed countries, helping to prevent or delay up to 24 million deaths over time.

    “Since smoking causes 85% of lung cancers, which in turn account for 20% of all cancer deaths worldwide, this represents a major achievement for the FCTC,” he said at the Asia Forum on Nicotine.

    However, Pang said that despite this early success, there were still 8 million deaths annually linked to smoking, with 4 out of 5 of these deaths occurring in lower-middle-income countries.

    He said there were two reasons for this, namely the relatively slow implementation of FCTC articles by signatory countries, and the non-recognition of less harmful and alternative tobacco products as a means to curb smoking.

    He said this was despite “overwhelming evidence” of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of these (alternative) products used by some 130 million people around the world.

    “Despite all of this, global health authorities have adopted a very strong anti-tobacco harm reduction (THR) stance.

    “(They) actually state that these products are as harmful as combustible cigarettes and call on their member states to ban them and actually give awards to countries which have done so.”

    Pang described this resistance as the “elephant in the room” and a “key barrier” to the wider adoption of THR.

    He said this was because many lower and lower-middle-income countries looked to the WHO for guidance in terms of setting their own policies.

    On the way forward, Pang mooted the establishment of independent, evidence-driven platforms involving key stakeholders to improve dialogue and coordination.

    He said such platforms could exist outside the FCTC structure and bring stakeholders, including producers, consumers, and investors, together to achieve five goals.

    This, Pang said, included demanding and improving the transparency and inclusivity in global decision-making processes.

    “Two, place tobacco harm reduction in the broader context of noncommunicable diseases, the Sustainable Development Goals and universal healthcare.

    “Third, aim for more inclusive and effective stakeholder engagement across civil society, industry, consumers, professional societies, etc.”

    Another goal would be to broaden the definition of tobacco control and advocate for risk-proportional regulation.

    “And finally, work with governments to highlight and disseminate success stories from countries that have been supportive of THR, perhaps through a storytelling approach.”

    However, he acknowledged there would be challenges in bringing the various stakeholders together.

    Pang ended his keynote, saying he has become a supporter for THR due to “overwhelming scientific evidence” and its value in helping smoking cessation.

    He also cited a quote from renowned physician Alex Wodak, that the current opposition to THR was becoming obsolete.

    “And I quote Alex – WHO’s position on this issue is now as irrelevant as the position of governments in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the 1980s on the future of central command economies. WHO’s position will collapse at some point, but I don’t know when.”

    Meanwhile, in one of the sessions at the forum, Professor Dr. Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh, who chairs the Malaysian Society of Harm Reduction (MSHR), shared similar sentiments on THR.

    She said there was actually nothing new about harm reduction, having been used in HIV prevention and drug therapy.

    However, she noted this was not the case for tobacco.

    “A lot of Asian countries are also members of the FCTC, so they follow what the WHO says. Anything with tobacco plus nicotine is seen as something harmful.”

    She said the way forward would be for tobacco harm reduction to be recognised as part of comprehensive public health strategies, though she admitted this was unlikely.

    Ultimately, both experts agreed that reframing tobacco harm reduction as part of broader public health strategies could open the door to more inclusive and effective policies in the years ahead.