Tag: Eleventh Circuit

  • Top Tobacco’s $1.1M Verdict Likely to Stand

    Top Tobacco’s $1.1M Verdict Likely to Stand

    A company that sold counterfeit Top Tobacco LP cigarette rolling papers likely won’t escape a $1.1 million jury verdict, an Eleventh Circuit panel indicated during oral argument. A jury found Star Importers and Wholesalers Inc. sold counterfeit papers, though not willfully. Although Star proved it profited just $7,000 from accidental infringement, Top Tobacco elected statutory damages, which for non-willful infringement range from $1,000 to $200,000 per mark, and the jury awarded $123,000 for each of nine infringed trademarks.

    The panel suggested that overruling the properly instructed jury’s verdict, which fits within statutory damages boundaries in trademark law, would undercut Top Tobacco’s right to a jury trial.

    Circuit Chief Judge William H. Pryor said the jury was free to consider factors including the value of the brand and deterrence. He noted that statutory damages can be punitive, so no actual losses or profits are required, nor is willfulness.

    “It seems to me hard to accept an argument that there has to be this relation to actual damages, because the entire point of statutory damages is as an alternative to actual damages,” Pryor said. “We’re trying to deter negligence in the distribution of counterfeit products that pose a risk to public safety and that harm the reputation of a brand that a seller has spent millions of dollars every year in marketing.”

    Star was one of several entities sued by Top Tobacco in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia over counterfeit papers in 2019. Another, Gabsons Novelties, filed a failed petition to the Supreme Court arguing its principal couldn’t be personally liable as he didn’t know of the ongoing infringement that had started before his tenure.

  • Bidi Opens Latest Appeal Against FDA

    Bidi Opens Latest Appeal Against FDA

    Yesterday (April 2), Bidi Vapor LLC urged the Eleventh Circuit to reverse a U.S. Food and Drug Administration decision denying its application to market a disposable e-cigarette, saying the agency acted unlawfully. In oral arguments in Miami, attorney Eric Gotting told an appellate panel that the FDA’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious and unlawful,” and that the agency admitted adult smokers would likely switch to Bidi’s safer product—a disposable e-cigarette prefilled with tobacco-flavored e-liquid—but still denied the application.

    In January 2024, the FDA issued a marketing denial order (MDO) for the tobacco-flavored Bidi Stick-Classic disposable vape. The decision came while the agency was continuing a court-ordered second review of marketing applications for flavored Bidi Vapor products. The FDA said Bidi’s premarket tobacco application “did not demonstrate an overall net benefit to people who use tobacco products and lacked sufficient evidence to address health risks.”

    Bidi believes the FDA violated the Administrative Procedure Act and hopes to build on its record of successfully contesting adverse FDA decisions. In August 2022, the 11th Circuit set aside the original MDOs issued for its 10 non-tobacco-flavored products. That ruling put the 10 PMTAs back into scientific review and allowed those flavors to remain available for sale pursuant to the FDA’s compliance policy for deemed tobacco products.