Tag: medical devices

  • The Therapeutic Track

    The Therapeutic Track

    Photo: goodmanphoto

    Key considerations for designing vapes as medical devices

    By Pete Lomas

    To further support the transition from smoking to reduced-risk nicotine products, the U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is encouraging next-generation nicotine product manufacturers to consider the marketing authorization application (MAA) route to market. Nicotine products, such as vape devices, authorized via this regulatory pathway can be marketed as smoking cessation tools and prescribed by healthcare professionals.

    This article discusses how manufacturers can design vapes to improve their chances of MAA approval, giving a particular focus to delivered dose uniformity (DDU), which is a critical parameter for any authorized medical inhalation device.

    Medicinal vapes will be classified in a similar way as conventional pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), meaning they must meet similar criteria for approval. One key criteria is DDU, a measure used to ensure patients are getting the same amount of drug delivery both within and between devices.

    Achieving DDU is challenging in vapes for several reasons. Most consumer vapes rely on traditional coil and wick technology. The wick is saturated with e-liquid, and when the coil heats up, the wick releases vapor for the user to inhale. Coil-based and wick-based vapes are prone to inconsistency caused by a variety of issues, such as variation in battery life, power delivery and temperature, to highlight a few.

    The MHRA recognizes that vapes are fundamentally different from pMDIs and has made some concessions related to DDU. However, manufacturers must achieve nine out of 10 doses within 25 percent of the mean and all doses within 35 percent of the mean. In addition, the mean of 10 puffs must fall within 15 percent of the label claim. To have the best chance of MAA approval, manufacturers should design vapes well within these limits. Manufacturers can achieve this by adapting existing vape designs or by turning to novel technology.

    Adapting Existing Technology

    Several areas of product development influence DDU, including airflow, e-liquid properties, test methods, e-liquid delivery, packaging, production and power delivery. Ceramic heating elements are one example of a way manufacturers are changing their designs to improve DDU. Ceramic elements improve the consistency of power delivery while more accurately controlling the wicking rate via engineering of the wick’s pore size.

    Another way a design can be adapted is with the introduction of thermocontrols that regulate power delivery and therefore the temperature of the coil. Thermocontrols help ensure the same amount of vapor is being released with each inhale by setting a temperature limit that applies to the wick no matter the battery level of the device. Vape manufacturers can also consider the influence of the airflow path on DDU, such as tightening manufacturing tolerances.

    Photo: makcoud

    Emerging Technologies

    Alternatively, vape manufacturers can make use of emerging electronic nicotine-delivery system technologies to improve dosage consistency. Better control of droplet size can be achieved with devices based on piezo ceramic meshes, a similar technology to that used in medical nebulizers. E-cigarette devices based on piezo technology use mechanical forces, in the form of ultrasonic waves, to convert the e-liquid into vapor in a process known as atomization. The droplet size and dosage can be predefined through the mesh dimensions, allowing for uniformity in the vapor.

    Another emerging technology is microfluidic liquid delivery. This technology uses the surface tension of the liquid to transport it along micro channels for “wicking” and is a more engineered solution than conventional wicks.

    Regulatory Insight

    Businesses with products undergoing the premarket tobacco product application process can reuse this data to reduce the number of new studies required for an MAA. However, MAA applicants should expect the process to be extended. Working with a scientific and regulatory compliance partner that can support you through the process, from product design to regulatory approval, can increase your chances of success.

    Pete Lomas is a managing consultant at Broughton, a global scientific consultancy-based contract research organization serving customers operating in the pharmaceuticals, next-generation nicotine-delivery products and cannabinoids industries. Among other services, the company offers support with the MAA pathway. For more information, visit www.broughton-group.com/maa-regulatory-support-and-submission-service.

  • E-cigs are medical devices, says Swedish Court

    E-cigarettes and e-liquids that contain nicotine are medical devices rather than consumer products and therefore require licensing, a Swedish appeals court has ruled.

    In a previous case from July 2014, Sweden’s medical products agency convinced the administrative court in Uppsala that nicotine-containing e-cigarettes should be deemed medical devices and that as many as 30 products should be banned from sale to consumers. An e-cigarette supplier in Malmo challenged the ruling shortly after, and the prohibition was lifted until the appeal was heard. Sales of e-cigarettes were allowed to continue during the appeals process.

    Following the appellate court’s most recent ruling, however, it is now illegal to import, distribute or sell e-cigarettes and nicotine-containing e-liquids commercially in Sweden, and violators could face penalties of approximately $80,000 per offense. Further appeals of the court’s most recent decision are planned and could result in another temporary suspension of the ban until a final decision is made by Sweden’s supreme administrative court. E-cigarettes and e-liquids that do not contain nicotine are unaffected by the ruling.