TobaccoReporter logo

Tag: e-cigarettes

  • Marketing Orders for Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro

    Marketing Orders for Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on May 12 gave R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (RJRVC) permission to continue marketing the original-flavor varieties of its Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro products. In October 2021, the FDA authorized the marketing of Vuse Solo original flavor.

    “These authorizations represent the broadest portfolio of market authorizations provided to any company in the U.S for premarket tobacco product applications (PMTA),” said David O’Reilly, director of scientific research at RJRVC’s parent company, BAT, in a statement. “Continued focus on science and innovation has supported the robust submissions, which have enabled FDA to evaluate and authorize the marketing of these products.

    “We are proud of the work undertaken by the team to achieve this significant regulatory milestone and are confident in the quality of our applications.”

    While approving the original-flavor varieties, the FDA denied RJRVC’s applications for the marketing of Vuse-branded products with other flavors. Those flavored vapor products are not currently marketed or sold in the U.S., according to BAT. The company says it is reviewing the FDA’s decision on those applications to determine next steps.

    RJRVC’s application to market menthol-flavored Vuse products remains under FDA review and those products can remain on market pending a decision from the agency.

  • Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate Policy Proposals

    Taiwan: Stakeholders Debate Policy Proposals

    Photo: Andrii Yalanskyi | Adobe Stock

    A demonstrative policy debate event on whether e-cigarettes should be regulated was held on March 8, 2022, in Taipei, showing how different public policy viewpoints can be rationally discussed, according to The Taipei Times. The debate was held by the Chinese Debate Promotion Association (CDPA) at the Taipei NGO House.

    CDPA Chairman and Founder Chia Pei-te said that the Executive Yuan in January approved a draft amendment to the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act proposed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare for legislative review. The proposed regulations on emerging tobacco products have sparked discussions, he said.

    The amendment would classify emerging tobacco products as “tobacco-like products” and “designated tobacco products.” E-cigarettes would be classified as “tobacco-like products” and be fully banned while heated-tobacco products would be classified as “designated tobacco products” and be subject to regulation.

    The reasoning behind banning e-cigarettes includes keeping curious teenagers away from the products, preventing consumers from adding nicotine to e-cigarette e-liquids and lowering the risk of teenage users turning to smoking.

    The debate participants went back and forth discussing the pros and cons of regulating e-cigarettes versus banning them, bringing up subjects such as public health, tax revenue options and teenage use.

    National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Dean Kang Jaw-jou said that he was moved by opinions for and against e-cigarettes. He said the affirmative side proposed to directly manage e-cigarette use through regulations and an approval system while the opposing side stressed their attitude to life—banning a substance if the public consensus deems it harmful to society.

    Many aspects of the topic can be argued, but e-cigarettes can cause negative health effects, and supporters and opponents must clearly present this fact to the public in further discussions, stated Wang Hsiang-tsui, NYCU Faculty of Pharmacy associate professor.