TobaccoReporter logo

Blog

  • Vietnam Considering Generational Ban

    Vietnam Considering Generational Ban

    Vietnam’s Ministry of Health proposed banning people born on or after January 1, 2010, from purchasing or using tobacco products as part of broader amendments to the country’s tobacco control law. The proposal was presented during a workshop tied to World No Tobacco Day 2026 and forms part of efforts to create a “smoke-free generation” in the country.

    The proposed revisions would also prohibit the production, sale, transport, advertising, promotion, sponsorship, and use of e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and other next-generation nicotine products, and would additionally ban tobacco product displays at wholesale and retail outlets. Health officials said the measures are intended to reduce smoking rates, limit secondhand smoke exposure, and address rising youth nicotine use.

  • BAT Kenya Says Proposed Laws Threaten 100K Jobs

    BAT Kenya Says Proposed Laws Threaten 100K Jobs

    British American Tobacco Kenya warned that proposed amendments to Kenya’s tobacco control laws could cost the government an estimated Sh12 billion ($92 million) in annual revenue and threaten more than 100,000 jobs across the tobacco supply chain. In a memorandum submitted to Kenya’s National Assembly, BAT Kenya said provisions in the Tobacco Control (Amendment) Bill, 2024, could worsen the illicit cigarette trade, which the company estimates already accounts for about 45% of the country’s cigarette market.

    The proposed legislation includes bans on flavors in tobacco and nicotine products, tighter regulation of e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches, expanded graphic warning requirements, potential plain packaging rules, additional licensing obligations for retailers, restrictions on single-use plastics, and a proposed 100-metre limit on tobacco sales locations. BAT Kenya also objected to plans to classify electronic cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches as tobacco products, arguing the bill does not distinguish between combustible and non-combustible nicotine products.

    BAT Kenya Managing Director Crispin Achola said the company supports public health goals but called for a more balanced and evidence-based regulatory framework. The company urged lawmakers to conduct broader stakeholder consultations and pointed to countries including the United Kingdom, Sweden, and New Zealand as examples of markets using differentiated regulation for alternative nicotine products.

  • Fight Over Foreign-Sourced Vape Ban Continues in Texas Appeals Court

    Fight Over Foreign-Sourced Vape Ban Continues in Texas Appeals Court

    Texas officials are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to dismiss a lawsuit challenging a state law that restricts the sale of e-cigarette products containing liquids sourced from China and other designated foreign adversaries. According to court filings, the acting Texas comptroller argues the office is protected by sovereign immunity and should not be subject to the lawsuit brought by vape companies and the Vapor Technology Association.

    According to Law 360, the dispute centers on a recently enacted Texas law targeting vape products tied to countries identified as foreign adversaries, adding another layer to the increasingly complex regulatory environment facing the U.S. vaping sector. Texas officials have also argued in earlier filings that the plaintiffs lack standing and that claims about business harm remain speculative.

  • Vape Companies Challenge Pa. E-Cigarette Law in Federal Court

    Vape Companies Challenge Pa. E-Cigarette Law in Federal Court

    Several vape manufacturers and retailers have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new Pennsylvania law they say would effectively remove most e-cigarette products from the market by limiting sales to products authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The plaintiffs, including Puffbar Inc., Mi-One Brands LLC, American Vapor Manufacturers Association, and Pennsylvania-based vape retailers and distributors, argue the statute is unconstitutional, conflicts with federal authority over tobacco regulation, and could force businesses to absorb roughly $2 million in unsellable inventory.

    According to Law 360, the lawsuit contends that the Pennsylvania law improperly intrudes into areas governed by the FDA’s premarket tobacco application process and unfairly targets products that some federal officials and public health researchers have described as potentially useful for adult smoking cessation. Industry groups also argue the measure could disproportionately affect independent vape retailers and smaller manufacturers already facing mounting regulatory pressure across the U.S. market.

  • PMI Launches Five-City Tour as Part of America250 Initiative

    PMI Launches Five-City Tour as Part of America250 Initiative

    Philip Morris International announced a nationwide America250 initiative through its U.S. business this week, combining community investment, innovation programs, manufacturing expansion, and brand marketing tied to the country’s 250th anniversary celebrations. The initiative builds on PMI U.S.’s previously announced $1 billion investment in U.S. manufacturing, operations, and workforce development, alongside continued expansion of its smoke-free product portfolio, including Zyn nicotine pouches and IQOS heated tobacco products.

    The program includes a $250,000 Community Futures Challenge for entrepreneurs and civic innovators, a five-city innovation tour across Phoenix, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Nashville, and Stamford, Connecticut, and expanded volunteer and charitable activities. Since 2022, PMI U.S. said it has contributed more than $35 million to charitable organizations and plans to mobilize its 3,300-person workforce for community service initiatives focused on food insecurity, housing support, and essential services.

    PMI U.S. also highlighted ongoing investments in modern nicotine manufacturing and commercialization, including preparations for future product launches and expansion of its Aurora, Colorado, facility. As part of the campaign, the company plans to release limited-edition America250-themed Zyn and IQOS products for adult nicotine consumers, with broader promotional activity continuing through 2026 ahead of a planned Next.Now Summit in Phoenix in early 2027.

  • Scientist reveals nail salons are worse than “second-hand vaping”

    Scientist reveals nail salons are worse than “second-hand vaping”

    Public confusion should not drive vape policy, says Dr Marina Murphy

    As the UK government considers extending smoke-free legislation to create new vape-free areas in England, experts are warning that vaping policy must be based on evidence—not public misunderstanding.

    Proposals to restrict vaping in areas such as playgrounds, school grounds and outside hospitals are intended to protect the public from second-hand exposure. However, the scientific evidence does not support treating vaping like smoking.

    Here, Dr. Marina Murphy, Director of Scientific Affairs at Northerner, sets out the current scientific understanding of “second-hand vaping” and highlights the need for policy to be based on evidence.

    Is there such a thing as second-hand vapour?

    While often described as “second-hand vapour,” passive exposure to vape aerosol is not comparable to second-hand smoke. Vapes do not contain tobacco, involve no combustion, and produce no side-stream smoke, which is the smoke produced when a cigarette is not being actively smoked, the primary source of harmful passive smoking exposure. 

    UK health authorities, including the NHS and Cancer Research UK, state there is no good evidence that passive vaping is harmful to bystanders.

    What do the public think about second-hand vaping?

    New research commissioned by Northerner highlights widespread public misunderstanding about vaping and health risks. The survey found that 43% of respondents believe exposure to vape aerosol is as harmful as exposure to cigarette smoke, despite this not being supported by the evidence. Only 32% correctly identified the statement as false, while 25% were unsure.

    Almost half (46%) also incorrectly believe vaping involves exposure to more chemicals than smoking. These findings suggest public perceptions are increasingly out of step with the evidence.

    Is secondhand vaping harmful?

    When we talk about public exposure, it’s important to keep the science in perspective. Exhaled vape aerosol generally raises PM₂.₅ levels only slightly above background levels, often in the 1–10 µg/m³ range, and contains no carbon monoxide because there is no combustion. To put this into perspective, many everyday environments generate far higher air-quality impacts:

    • Frying or gas cooking can produce particulate matter₂.₅ peaks above 500 µg/m³
    • Nail salons and beauty products can push particulate levels above 200 µg/m³
    • Urban roadside pollution often ranges 10–50 µg/m³

    Does vaping expose users to more chemicals than smoking?

    No. Cigarette smoke contains around 7,000 chemicals, many of them toxic or carcinogenic. Vape aerosol contains significantly fewer harmful substances and is widely recognised as substantially less harmful than smoking. Claims that vaping exposes users to more chemicals than cigarettes are simply false.

    Should vaping be banned outdoors?

    There is no clear evidence-based justification for broad outdoor vaping bans. Vaping is widely recognised as a lower-risk alternative to smoking and remains one of the most effective tools available to help adults quit cigarettes. Treating vaping like smoking risks sending the wrong message to smokers. If policymakers blur the distinction between the two, they risk reinforcing misinformation, discouraging switching, and undermining tobacco harm reduction. The evidence is clear: vaping is not smoking, and regulating it as though it were is neither scientific nor proportionate.

  • USSTC Moving Facilities from Tennessee to Kentucky

    USSTC Moving Facilities from Tennessee to Kentucky

    U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company LLC announced plans to consolidate manufacturing operations as part of a long-term strategy to modernize production and improve operational efficiency. The Altria subsidiary will gradually transition manufacturing from its 800,000-square-foot Nashville, Tennessee, facility to a new 270,000-square-foot plant to be built on its existing campus in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, with Nashville operations expected to conclude in early 2028. The move is intended to centralize processing, production, and finishing activities for major smokeless tobacco brands, including Copenhagen, Skoal, Red Seal, and Husky.

    USSTC said the consolidation is expected to reduce fixed-cost inefficiencies, generate operational savings, and improve manufacturing resilience as market conditions evolve. The company plans to sell its more than 30-acre downtown Nashville campus, which currently employs over 300 workers, while encouraging employees to apply for positions in Hopkinsville or Richmond, Virginia. Employees not relocating will be offered severance and transition support. Hopkinsville, where the company already employs roughly 200 full-time workers, will become the primary production hub for USSTC’s smokeless tobacco operations using tobacco sourced primarily from Tennessee and Kentucky growers.

  • FDA Releases Environmental Review for Oral Nicotine Products

    FDA Releases Environmental Review for Oral Nicotine Products

    Today (May 21), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published a programmatic environmental assessment covering nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products reviewed through the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) process. The assessment applies to products categorized as “other,” including nicotine pouches, lozenges, tablets, gums, discs, dissolvable tobacco products, and nicotine-infused products, while excluding traditional smokeless tobacco products such as snus, dip, and chewing tobacco.

    The FDA concluded that the environmental impact of these products is generally minimal, citing the absence of airborne emissions during use and relatively limited environmental contamination from product waste. According to the agency, these products reduce or eliminate secondhand and thirdhand exposure risks compared with combustible products, while the waste generated contains comparatively fewer harmful chemicals that persist or bioaccumulate in the environment.

    The agency said the assessment is intended to support transparency and may be referenced by FDA reviewers evaluating individual product applications. However, the FDA emphasized that authorization decisions will continue to be made on a case-by-case basis based on the specific scientific evidence submitted for each product.

  • NYT Report Draws Attention to RJR Donation and FDA Policy Shift

    NYT Report Draws Attention to RJR Donation and FDA Policy Shift

    Reynolds American is under scrutiny following a The New York Times report linking a $5 million donation to a pro-Donald Trump super PAC with recent shifts in U.S. Food and Drug Administration policy on flavored vaping products. The report said Reynolds executives met with Trump shortly before the FDA issued guidance that could ease market access for certain flavored vape and nicotine pouch products, potentially benefiting major tobacco companies in the growing U.S. e-cigarette market.

    The White House denied any connection between the donations and policy decisions, stating that FDA actions are based on scientific evidence and public health considerations.

  • EU Requests Feedback on New Tobacco Control Rules

    EU Requests Feedback on New Tobacco Control Rules

    The European Commission launched a public consultation on plans to update the EU’s tobacco control framework, reflecting changing market dynamics, evolving consumption trends, and the growing role of digital marketing in nicotine product promotion. The proposed directive aims to strengthen public health protections, improve the functioning of the EU internal market, and support implementation of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in line with Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan. The feedback period for the initiative runs from May 18 to June 15, and is expected to inform future regulatory changes affecting traditional tobacco products as well as emerging nicotine categories.