TobaccoReporter logo

Category: Around the Industry

  • RJR Seeks to Overturn $34.5M Verdict

    RJR Seeks to Overturn $34.5M Verdict

    R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. asked Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal to overturn a $34.5 million wrongful death verdict awarded to the widow of a smoker who died at age 38, arguing the plaintiff failed to prove the smoker relied on any fraudulent statements by the company regarding the health risks of cigarettes. Reynolds contends Florida Supreme Court precedent requires Engle-progeny plaintiffs pursuing fraud-based claims to demonstrate reliance on specific misleading statements, and that the evidence presented at trial did not meet that standard.

    The appeal is the latest in a series of post-Engle tobacco cases in Florida, where cigarette manufacturers continue to challenge large jury awards on issues including fraud, jury instructions, and comparative fault. Recent appellate decisions have shown Florida courts closely scrutinizing whether trial courts properly instructed juries and whether plaintiffs satisfied the evidentiary requirements for fraudulent concealment claims, making the outcome of the appeal potentially significant for future Engle litigation.

  • South African Health Officials Call for Harm Reduction

    South African Health Officials Call for Harm Reduction

    Former South African Parliamentary Health Portfolio Committee Chair Sibongiseni Dhlomo urged policymakers to incorporate tobacco harm reduction into the country’s Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill, arguing that the government should apply the same public health principles used in HIV prevention and other risk-reduction programs. Speaking at a health policy event in Johannesburg, Dhlomo said regulation should distinguish between combustible cigarettes and smoke-free nicotine products, noting that public consultations and scientific evidence had changed his views on the continuum of risk associated with different nicotine products.

    The comments come as Parliament prepares to begin clause-by-clause deliberations on the tobacco bill following approval of its desirability in June. Other speakers, including Gauteng Health MEC Faith Mazibuko and former Health MEC Dr. Bandile Masuku, also endorsed harm reduction as a broader public health strategy, while Philip Morris International said science should guide tobacco regulation and that adult smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit should be encouraged to switch completely to less harmful non-combustible alternatives.

  • Pakistan Senate Panel Expands Probe Into Alleged Cigarette Smuggling Case

    Pakistan Senate Panel Expands Probe Into Alleged Cigarette Smuggling Case

    A Pakistani Senate subcommittee widened its investigation into the seizure of 11 trucks allegedly carrying smuggled cigarettes, while rejecting what it described as a media campaign linking committee members to the case. The panel ordered the Federal Board of Revenue to identify officials responsible for media briefings following a July 20 hearing and directed the Federal Investigation Agency to investigate what it called targeted smear campaigns against lawmakers.

    The committee also questioned Customs’ handling of the seizure, including its jurisdiction, the legal basis for the case, conflicting valuations of the seized cargo, and delays in producing arrested truck drivers before a court. As part of a broader review of tobacco tax evasion and smuggling—estimated at about $1 billion annually—the panel called for additional information on tax-exempt imports, quota registrations, and customs procedures, saying it intends to expand scrutiny of potential irregularities across customs posts, dry ports, and revenue agencies.

  • Judge Signals Uphill Battle for Vapes Challenge PA Registry Law

    Judge Signals Uphill Battle for Vapes Challenge PA Registry Law

    A federal judge indicated that vape companies challenging Pennsylvania’s new e-cigarette registry law will need to distinguish their case from recent appellate rulings that largely upheld similar laws in North Carolina and Iowa. During proceedings, the judge directed the plaintiffs to address decisions by the Fourth and Eighth U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, both of which rejected key arguments that state registry laws tied to the FDA’s premarket authorization process are preempted by federal law.

    Pennsylvania’s law, enacted in 2025, establishes a directory of manufacturers whose products may be legally sold in the state, effectively limiting sales to products meeting specified federal regulatory criteria. Retailers challenging the measure argue it improperly enforces the federal Tobacco Control Act, conflicts with the FDA’s enforcement discretion, and would force the removal of millions of dollars in inventory from store shelves. Similar “PMTA registry” laws have been adopted in more than a dozen states as lawmakers seek to curb sales of unauthorized vaping products.

    The court’s comments suggest Pennsylvania’s case could hinge on whether the plaintiffs can identify meaningful legal distinctions from the North Carolina and Iowa precedents.

  • South Korea Scrutinizing ‘Nicotine-Free’ Vape Claims

    South Korea Scrutinizing ‘Nicotine-Free’ Vape Claims

    South Korea is increasing oversight of “nicotine-free” and nicotine analogue vaping products after government tests found some contained nicotine or 6-methyl nicotine despite their labeling. The Korea Times says the market has grown rapidly since April, when synthetic nicotine products became subject to tobacco regulations and higher taxes, driving demand for products marketed as regulatory alternatives. Imports of nicotine-free vapes climbed to 164 tons in 2025 from 95 tons in 2022, with most sourced from China.

    The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety said testing of 105 products found nicotine in 13 and 6-methyl nicotine in 12. The government is now conducting toxicity assessments, investigating unlicensed businesses, and preparing broader regulatory measures expected later this year. Industry representatives say the products exploit a legal loophole by avoiding tobacco regulations while being marketed as nicotine-free.

  • BAT Faces Expanded Class-Action Claims over Natural American Spirit

    BAT Faces Expanded Class-Action Claims over Natural American Spirit

    A divided federal appeals court revived class-action claims against British American Tobacco, Reynolds American, R.J. Reynolds, and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco over allegations that labels on Natural American Spirit cigarettes misled consumers into believing the products were safer than other cigarettes and contained no additives. Yesterday (July 29), the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s refusal to certify the 12-state “safer cigarette” class while upholding certification of a separate eight-state class alleging that menthol constituted an additive.

    The case covers consumers in California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington. The appeals court said the lower court prematurely addressed whether the products’ disclaimer — stating that the absence of additives “does NOT mean a safer cigarette” — was effective. A dissenting judge argued neither class should have been certified and warned that the decision could allow consumers who never read the labels to seek damages. The case returns to the lower court for further proceedings.

  • Experts Call for Stronger Tobacco Control Across Africa

    Experts Call for Stronger Tobacco Control Across Africa

    Public health experts, policymakers, researchers, and civil society advocates from 12 African countries are meeting in Lagos, Nigeria, for a five-day Tobacco Industry Monitoring course focused on “countering tobacco industry interference” in public health policy. The program, organized by the Africa Center for Tobacco Industry Monitoring and Policy Research, is training participants to monitor industry activity, conduct research, and support implementation of Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

    The course covers tobacco taxation, industry document research, political mapping, social media investigations, legal accountability, and the tobacco industry’s evolving harm reduction agenda. ATIM Director Olalekan Ayo Yusuf said multinational tobacco companies increasingly view Africa as a growth market and urged governments to strengthen policies before tobacco use rises. Participants from Kenya, Nigeria, Benin, Botswana, South Africa, Sierra Leone, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Uganda, Zambia, Senegal and Zimbabwe are taking part.

  • Decision Nears in Brazil’s Tobacco Health-Cost Lawsuit

    Decision Nears in Brazil’s Tobacco Health-Cost Lawsuit

    A landmark lawsuit filed by Brazil’s Office of the Attorney General in 2019 seeking to recover public healthcare costs linked to smoking has reached the decision stage. All legal submissions have been completed, including an opinion from the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office supporting the government’s claims. The Federal Court in Porto Alegre will now decide whether the country’s largest cigarette manufacturers are liable for health damages associated with the marketing and sale of their products.

    The case targets BAT Brazil and Philip Morris Brazil, and their parent companies, British American Tobacco and Philip Morris International, seeking compensation for tobacco-related healthcare expenditures. The lawsuit estimates that smoking causes about 177,000 deaths annually in Brazil and R$75 billion ($15 billion) in healthcare costs.

  • Amicus Briefs Back Altria, Juul in Antitrust Appeal

    Amicus Briefs Back Altria, Juul in Antitrust Appeal

    The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 14 states, and several legal groups are backing Altria and Juul’s appeal of a lower-court decision allowing antitrust claims against the companies to proceed as a class action. The briefs argue that the trial court improperly relied on California law to cover alleged conduct and purchases occurring in other states, where different antitrust laws and standards apply. The Chamber and other amici contend that applying California’s Cartwright Act across multiple jurisdictions creates significant legal and manageability problems for the litigation.

    The underlying lawsuit alleges that Altria’s 2018 investment in Juul, together with its decision to withdraw from the U.S. e-cigarette market, harmed competition and contributed to higher prices, which Altria and Juul dispute.

  • Canadian Court Certifies Class Action Against Juul, Altria

    Canadian Court Certifies Class Action Against Juul, Altria

    The Supreme Court of British Columbia certified a nationwide class action against Juul Labs and Altria Group, allowing claims to proceed on behalf of individuals in Canada who purchased or used Juul products for personal use between August 2018 and July 15, 2026. The lawsuit alleges the companies marketed e-cigarettes as a safer alternative to cigarettes while contributing to nicotine addiction among a new generation of consumers. The ruling is procedural and does not determine liability.

    The court rejected several arguments raised by Juul and Altria regarding certification, allowing the case to move forward. The action is one of two legal proceedings against Juul in Canada, alongside a separate lawsuit by the government of British Columbia seeking recovery of healthcare costs associated with the company’s products. Juul and Altria may appeal the certification decision.