TobaccoReporter logo

Category: Around the Industry

  • ACHE Cites Evidence That Youth Tobacco Measures Are Working

    ACHE Cites Evidence That Youth Tobacco Measures Are Working

    Today (May 27), the Asian Coalition for Health Empowerment (ACHE) shared its outlook based on the FDA’s 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) data that was released earlier this year, pointing to continued declines in youth tobacco and nicotine use while calling for more balanced, evidence-based regulation. The FDA data showed overall youth tobacco use fell to 7.5% in 2025 from 8.1% in 2024, while youth e-cigarette use dropped to 5.2% — the lowest level recorded in a decade. Use of nicotine pouches remained relatively low and stable at 1.7%, while use of other oral nicotine products, such as gums and lozenges, declined sharply to 0.6%.

    Following the release of the data, ACHE brought together public health experts and policy voices to discuss implications for tobacco harm reduction and future regulation. Dr. Anjum Datta said the results highlight the value of sustained public health strategies that combine awareness, regulation, and behavioral interventions, while cautioning against policies that could unintentionally limit harm reduction options for adult smokers. Dr. Dewesh Kumar said the findings support targeted regulation and youth protections without relying on “extreme prohibitive measures,” adding that adult smoking cessation efforts should remain part of the broader public health discussion.

  • CVA Touts Vaping as Path to Canada’s Smoke-Free Future

    CVA Touts Vaping as Path to Canada’s Smoke-Free Future

    Ahead of World Vape Day 2026 on May 30 and World No Tobacco Day on May 31, the Canadian Vaping Association said that declining youth vaping rates in Canada show that current regulations are working, while warning against proposed federal flavor bans. Citing data from Canada’s Third Legislative Review of the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act, the group noted past-30-day vaping among youth ages 12 to 17 fell from 13.2% in 2019 to 5.8% in 2024, a decline of nearly 60%.

    Association President Sam Tam said policymakers should rely on current evidence rather than “outdated statistics” when considering additional restrictions. The group also pointed to newly published studies supporting vaping as a smoking cessation tool for adults and argued that broad flavor prohibitions could undermine Canada’s goal of reducing smoking rates below 5% by 2035 while fueling illicit markets.

  • Tennessee Expands Vapor Product Definitions

    Tennessee Expands Vapor Product Definitions

    Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed legislation broadening the state’s definitions of “consumable material” and “vapor product” to explicitly include natural and synthetic liquid nicotine solutions and nicotine analogues used in e-cigarettes and related products. The measure, enacted under HB 2359, updates state tobacco and vapor product laws covering taxation, regulation, and enforcement.

    The law clarifies that vapor products include noncombustible devices using heating elements, batteries, or electronic mechanisms to produce vapor, including electronic cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos, pipes, and associated cartridges or containers. It also expands taxable consumable materials to include synthetic nicotine and nicotine analogue formulations.

    In addition, the legislation gives Tennessee’s Alcoholic Beverage Commission authority to issue fines for violations involving the retail sale or offering of vapor products to individuals under the age of 21. The law took effect immediately upon approval and amended multiple sections of the Tennessee code related to tobacco, taxation, and retail enforcement.

  • Pakistan Intensifies Illegal Tobacco Crackdown

    Pakistan Intensifies Illegal Tobacco Crackdown

    Pakistan continues to step up enforcement actions against illicit cigarette manufacturing and non-duty-paid tobacco products, with advocacy group ACT Alliance Pakistan praising recent government efforts led by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). The group said ongoing operations targeting smuggled brands, counterfeit tax stamps, and violations of the Track and Trace Systems are aimed at protecting tax revenue and formal businesses, estimating that the illegal cigarette trade costs the country more than Rs300 billion ($1.1 billion) annually.

    ACT Alliance Country Director Mubashir Akram said sustained enforcement is essential to prevent tax evasion networks from undermining the formal economy, adding that illicit trade is increasingly structured across manufacturing, distribution, and retail channels. He also warned that regulatory pressure must be consistent rather than episodic and called for stronger coordination among enforcement agencies, including Customs, Inland Revenue, and provincial authorities. The group further argued that tackling illicit tobacco is linked to broader investor confidence, stating that perceptions of enforcement effectiveness influence both domestic and foreign investment decisions.

  • Bidi Workers Form Human-Chain Protest in Bangladesh

    Bidi Workers Form Human-Chain Protest in Bangladesh

    Bangladesh bidi workers staged a human chain protest in Pabna on May 24, opposing proposals to raise bidi prices and increase supplementary duty in the country’s 2026–27 national budget. Members of the Pabna District Bidi Workers Union objected to recommendations from Atma-Pragya and Ahsania Mission to increase bidi prices from Tk 18 to Tk 30 ($0.15 to $0.24) and raise supplementary duty from 30% to 50%.

    During the demonstration, workers presented a five-point demand that included maintaining current bidi tax rates, increasing working days for bidi workers, enforcing bandroll use only for licensed factories, raising prices on low-tier cigarette packs, and cracking down on counterfeit bidi production and sales. Leaders from the Bangladesh Bidi Workers Federation participated in the protest and warned that higher taxes could further pressure workers employed in the sector.

  • JTI, Authorities Trying to Dent Malaysia’s Illicit Market

    JTI, Authorities Trying to Dent Malaysia’s Illicit Market

    Japan Tobacco International said the illicit cigarette trade remains a major challenge in Malaysia, with counterfeit tax stamps and increasingly sophisticated cross-border smuggling operations complicating enforcement efforts. According to JTI Malaysia, the share of illicit cigarettes carrying counterfeit Malaysian tax stamps rose from 8.7% in 2023 to 16% in January 2026, the highest level recorded. The company cited a recent enforcement operation in the Philippines that uncovered counterfeit Malaysian tax stamps allegedly intended for the Malaysian market.

    JTIM estimated the country’s illicit cigarette incidence rate at 56.7%, representing roughly RM4 billion ($1 billion) in lost government revenue. Company executives said affordability remains a key driver of illicit trade, warning that rising logistics costs, raw material inflation, and potential excise tax increases could widen the price gap between legal and illicit products. The company also pointed to growing consumer migration toward alternative nicotine products such as vapes, which currently face lower taxation levels than cigarettes.

    JTIM said policymakers are evaluating stronger deterrence measures, including digital tax stamps designed to improve supply-chain tracking and real-time product authentication. The company also called for a more balanced tax framework across nicotine categories, advocating for vape taxation to align more closely with heated tobacco products rather than combustible cigarettes.

  • Fight Over Foreign-Sourced Vape Ban Continues in Texas Appeals Court

    Fight Over Foreign-Sourced Vape Ban Continues in Texas Appeals Court

    Texas officials are asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to dismiss a lawsuit challenging a state law that restricts the sale of e-cigarette products containing liquids sourced from China and other designated foreign adversaries. According to court filings, the acting Texas comptroller argues the office is protected by sovereign immunity and should not be subject to the lawsuit brought by vape companies and the Vapor Technology Association.

    According to Law 360, the dispute centers on a recently enacted Texas law targeting vape products tied to countries identified as foreign adversaries, adding another layer to the increasingly complex regulatory environment facing the U.S. vaping sector. Texas officials have also argued in earlier filings that the plaintiffs lack standing and that claims about business harm remain speculative.

  • Vape Companies Challenge Pa. E-Cigarette Law in Federal Court

    Vape Companies Challenge Pa. E-Cigarette Law in Federal Court

    Several vape manufacturers and retailers have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new Pennsylvania law they say would effectively remove most e-cigarette products from the market by limiting sales to products authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The plaintiffs, including Puffbar Inc., Mi-One Brands LLC, American Vapor Manufacturers Association, and Pennsylvania-based vape retailers and distributors, argue the statute is unconstitutional, conflicts with federal authority over tobacco regulation, and could force businesses to absorb roughly $2 million in unsellable inventory.

    According to Law 360, the lawsuit contends that the Pennsylvania law improperly intrudes into areas governed by the FDA’s premarket tobacco application process and unfairly targets products that some federal officials and public health researchers have described as potentially useful for adult smoking cessation. Industry groups also argue the measure could disproportionately affect independent vape retailers and smaller manufacturers already facing mounting regulatory pressure across the U.S. market.

  • Scientist reveals nail salons are worse than “second-hand vaping”

    Scientist reveals nail salons are worse than “second-hand vaping”

    Public confusion should not drive vape policy, says Dr Marina Murphy

    As the UK government considers extending smoke-free legislation to create new vape-free areas in England, experts are warning that vaping policy must be based on evidence—not public misunderstanding.

    Proposals to restrict vaping in areas such as playgrounds, school grounds and outside hospitals are intended to protect the public from second-hand exposure. However, the scientific evidence does not support treating vaping like smoking.

    Here, Dr. Marina Murphy, Director of Scientific Affairs at Northerner, sets out the current scientific understanding of “second-hand vaping” and highlights the need for policy to be based on evidence.

    Is there such a thing as second-hand vapour?

    While often described as “second-hand vapour,” passive exposure to vape aerosol is not comparable to second-hand smoke. Vapes do not contain tobacco, involve no combustion, and produce no side-stream smoke, which is the smoke produced when a cigarette is not being actively smoked, the primary source of harmful passive smoking exposure. 

    UK health authorities, including the NHS and Cancer Research UK, state there is no good evidence that passive vaping is harmful to bystanders.

    What do the public think about second-hand vaping?

    New research commissioned by Northerner highlights widespread public misunderstanding about vaping and health risks. The survey found that 43% of respondents believe exposure to vape aerosol is as harmful as exposure to cigarette smoke, despite this not being supported by the evidence. Only 32% correctly identified the statement as false, while 25% were unsure.

    Almost half (46%) also incorrectly believe vaping involves exposure to more chemicals than smoking. These findings suggest public perceptions are increasingly out of step with the evidence.

    Is secondhand vaping harmful?

    When we talk about public exposure, it’s important to keep the science in perspective. Exhaled vape aerosol generally raises PM₂.₅ levels only slightly above background levels, often in the 1–10 µg/m³ range, and contains no carbon monoxide because there is no combustion. To put this into perspective, many everyday environments generate far higher air-quality impacts:

    • Frying or gas cooking can produce particulate matter₂.₅ peaks above 500 µg/m³
    • Nail salons and beauty products can push particulate levels above 200 µg/m³
    • Urban roadside pollution often ranges 10–50 µg/m³

    Does vaping expose users to more chemicals than smoking?

    No. Cigarette smoke contains around 7,000 chemicals, many of them toxic or carcinogenic. Vape aerosol contains significantly fewer harmful substances and is widely recognised as substantially less harmful than smoking. Claims that vaping exposes users to more chemicals than cigarettes are simply false.

    Should vaping be banned outdoors?

    There is no clear evidence-based justification for broad outdoor vaping bans. Vaping is widely recognised as a lower-risk alternative to smoking and remains one of the most effective tools available to help adults quit cigarettes. Treating vaping like smoking risks sending the wrong message to smokers. If policymakers blur the distinction between the two, they risk reinforcing misinformation, discouraging switching, and undermining tobacco harm reduction. The evidence is clear: vaping is not smoking, and regulating it as though it were is neither scientific nor proportionate.

  • FDA Releases Environmental Review for Oral Nicotine Products

    FDA Releases Environmental Review for Oral Nicotine Products

    Today (May 21), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published a programmatic environmental assessment covering nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products reviewed through the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) process. The assessment applies to products categorized as “other,” including nicotine pouches, lozenges, tablets, gums, discs, dissolvable tobacco products, and nicotine-infused products, while excluding traditional smokeless tobacco products such as snus, dip, and chewing tobacco.

    The FDA concluded that the environmental impact of these products is generally minimal, citing the absence of airborne emissions during use and relatively limited environmental contamination from product waste. According to the agency, these products reduce or eliminate secondhand and thirdhand exposure risks compared with combustible products, while the waste generated contains comparatively fewer harmful chemicals that persist or bioaccumulate in the environment.

    The agency said the assessment is intended to support transparency and may be referenced by FDA reviewers evaluating individual product applications. However, the FDA emphasized that authorization decisions will continue to be made on a case-by-case basis based on the specific scientific evidence submitted for each product.